diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/rest/client/test_sync.py')
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/rest/client/test_sync.py | 1079 |
1 files changed, 1071 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/tests/rest/client/test_sync.py b/tests/rest/client/test_sync.py index 12c11f342c..966c622e14 100644 --- a/tests/rest/client/test_sync.py +++ b/tests/rest/client/test_sync.py @@ -31,12 +31,13 @@ from synapse.api.constants import ( AccountDataTypes, EventContentFields, EventTypes, + HistoryVisibility, ReceiptTypes, RelationTypes, ) from synapse.rest.client import devices, knock, login, read_marker, receipts, room, sync from synapse.server import HomeServer -from synapse.types import JsonDict, RoomStreamToken, StreamKeyType +from synapse.types import JsonDict, RoomStreamToken, StreamKeyType, StreamToken, UserID from synapse.util import Clock from tests import unittest @@ -1326,7 +1327,7 @@ class SlidingSyncTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase): def test_sync_list(self) -> None: """ - Test that room IDs show up in the Sliding Sync lists + Test that room IDs show up in the Sliding Sync `lists` """ alice_user_id = self.register_user("alice", "correcthorse") alice_access_token = self.login(alice_user_id, "correcthorse") @@ -1425,15 +1426,13 @@ class SlidingSyncTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase): channel.await_result(timeout_ms=200) self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200, channel.json_body) - # We expect the `next_pos` in the result to be the same as what we requested + # We expect the next `pos` in the result to be the same as what we requested # with because we weren't able to find anything new yet. - self.assertEqual( - channel.json_body["next_pos"], future_position_token_serialized - ) + self.assertEqual(channel.json_body["pos"], future_position_token_serialized) def test_filter_list(self) -> None: """ - Test that filters apply to lists + Test that filters apply to `lists` """ user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass") user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass") @@ -1564,7 +1563,7 @@ class SlidingSyncTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase): def test_sort_list(self) -> None: """ - Test that the lists are sorted by `stream_ordering` + Test that the `lists` are sorted by `stream_ordering` """ user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass") user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass") @@ -1618,3 +1617,1067 @@ class SlidingSyncTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase): ], channel.json_body["lists"]["foo-list"], ) + + def test_sliced_windows(self) -> None: + """ + Test that the `lists` `ranges` are sliced correctly. Both sides of each range + are inclusive. + """ + user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass") + user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass") + + _room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok, is_public=True) + room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok, is_public=True) + room_id3 = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok, is_public=True) + + # Make the Sliding Sync request for a single room + channel = self.make_request( + "POST", + self.sync_endpoint, + { + "lists": { + "foo-list": { + "ranges": [[0, 0]], + "required_state": [ + ["m.room.join_rules", ""], + ["m.room.history_visibility", ""], + ["m.space.child", "*"], + ], + "timeline_limit": 1, + } + } + }, + access_token=user1_tok, + ) + self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200, channel.json_body) + + # Make sure it has the foo-list we requested + self.assertListEqual( + list(channel.json_body["lists"].keys()), + ["foo-list"], + channel.json_body["lists"].keys(), + ) + # Make sure the list is sorted in the way we expect + self.assertListEqual( + list(channel.json_body["lists"]["foo-list"]["ops"]), + [ + { + "op": "SYNC", + "range": [0, 0], + "room_ids": [room_id3], + } + ], + channel.json_body["lists"]["foo-list"], + ) + + # Make the Sliding Sync request for the first two rooms + channel = self.make_request( + "POST", + self.sync_endpoint, + { + "lists": { + "foo-list": { + "ranges": [[0, 1]], + "required_state": [ + ["m.room.join_rules", ""], + ["m.room.history_visibility", ""], + ["m.space.child", "*"], + ], + "timeline_limit": 1, + } + } + }, + access_token=user1_tok, + ) + self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200, channel.json_body) + + # Make sure it has the foo-list we requested + self.assertListEqual( + list(channel.json_body["lists"].keys()), + ["foo-list"], + channel.json_body["lists"].keys(), + ) + # Make sure the list is sorted in the way we expect + self.assertListEqual( + list(channel.json_body["lists"]["foo-list"]["ops"]), + [ + { + "op": "SYNC", + "range": [0, 1], + "room_ids": [room_id3, room_id2], + } + ], + channel.json_body["lists"]["foo-list"], + ) + + def test_rooms_limited_initial_sync(self) -> None: + """ + Test that we mark `rooms` as `limited=True` when we saturate the `timeline_limit` + on initial sync. + """ + user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass") + user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass") + user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass") + user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass") + + room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity1", tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity2", tok=user2_tok) + event_response3 = self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity3", tok=user2_tok) + event_pos3 = self.get_success( + self.store.get_position_for_event(event_response3["event_id"]) + ) + event_response4 = self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity4", tok=user2_tok) + event_pos4 = self.get_success( + self.store.get_position_for_event(event_response4["event_id"]) + ) + event_response5 = self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity5", tok=user2_tok) + user1_join_response = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok) + + # Make the Sliding Sync request + channel = self.make_request( + "POST", + self.sync_endpoint, + { + "lists": { + "foo-list": { + "ranges": [[0, 1]], + "required_state": [], + "timeline_limit": 3, + } + } + }, + access_token=user1_tok, + ) + self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200, channel.json_body) + + # We expect to saturate the `timeline_limit` (there are more than 3 messages in the room) + self.assertEqual( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["limited"], + True, + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1], + ) + # Check to make sure the latest events are returned + self.assertEqual( + [ + event["event_id"] + for event in channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["timeline"] + ], + [ + event_response4["event_id"], + event_response5["event_id"], + user1_join_response["event_id"], + ], + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["timeline"], + ) + + # Check to make sure the `prev_batch` points at the right place + prev_batch_token = self.get_success( + StreamToken.from_string( + self.store, channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["prev_batch"] + ) + ) + prev_batch_room_stream_token_serialized = self.get_success( + prev_batch_token.room_key.to_string(self.store) + ) + # If we use the `prev_batch` token to look backwards, we should see `event3` + # next so make sure the token encompasses it + self.assertEqual( + event_pos3.persisted_after(prev_batch_token.room_key), + False, + f"`prev_batch` token {prev_batch_room_stream_token_serialized} should be >= event_pos3={self.get_success(event_pos3.to_room_stream_token().to_string(self.store))}", + ) + # If we use the `prev_batch` token to look backwards, we shouldn't see `event4` + # anymore since it was just returned in this response. + self.assertEqual( + event_pos4.persisted_after(prev_batch_token.room_key), + True, + f"`prev_batch` token {prev_batch_room_stream_token_serialized} should be < event_pos4={self.get_success(event_pos4.to_room_stream_token().to_string(self.store))}", + ) + + # With no `from_token` (initial sync), it's all historical since there is no + # "live" range + self.assertEqual( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["num_live"], + 0, + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1], + ) + + def test_rooms_not_limited_initial_sync(self) -> None: + """ + Test that we mark `rooms` as `limited=False` when there are no more events to + paginate to. + """ + user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass") + user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass") + user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass") + user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass") + + room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity1", tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity2", tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity3", tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok) + + # Make the Sliding Sync request + timeline_limit = 100 + channel = self.make_request( + "POST", + self.sync_endpoint, + { + "lists": { + "foo-list": { + "ranges": [[0, 1]], + "required_state": [], + "timeline_limit": timeline_limit, + } + } + }, + access_token=user1_tok, + ) + self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200, channel.json_body) + + # The timeline should be `limited=False` because we have all of the events (no + # more to paginate to) + self.assertEqual( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["limited"], + False, + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1], + ) + expected_number_of_events = 9 + # We're just looking to make sure we got all of the events before hitting the `timeline_limit` + self.assertEqual( + len(channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["timeline"]), + expected_number_of_events, + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["timeline"], + ) + self.assertLessEqual(expected_number_of_events, timeline_limit) + + # With no `from_token` (initial sync), it's all historical since there is no + # "live" token range. + self.assertEqual( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["num_live"], + 0, + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1], + ) + + def test_rooms_incremental_sync(self) -> None: + """ + Test `rooms` data during an incremental sync after an initial sync. + """ + user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass") + user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass") + user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass") + user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass") + + room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok) + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity before initial sync1", tok=user2_tok) + + # Make an initial Sliding Sync request to grab a token. This is also a sanity + # check that we can go from initial to incremental sync. + sync_params = { + "lists": { + "foo-list": { + "ranges": [[0, 1]], + "required_state": [], + "timeline_limit": 3, + } + } + } + channel = self.make_request( + "POST", + self.sync_endpoint, + sync_params, + access_token=user1_tok, + ) + self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200, channel.json_body) + next_pos = channel.json_body["pos"] + + # Send some events but don't send enough to saturate the `timeline_limit`. + # We want to later test that we only get the new events since the `next_pos` + event_response2 = self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after2", tok=user2_tok) + event_response3 = self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after3", tok=user2_tok) + + # Make an incremental Sliding Sync request (what we're trying to test) + channel = self.make_request( + "POST", + self.sync_endpoint + f"?pos={next_pos}", + sync_params, + access_token=user1_tok, + ) + self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200, channel.json_body) + + # We only expect to see the new events since the last sync which isn't enough to + # fill up the `timeline_limit`. + self.assertEqual( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["limited"], + False, + f'Our `timeline_limit` was {sync_params["lists"]["foo-list"]["timeline_limit"]} ' + + f'and {len(channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["timeline"])} events were returned in the timeline. ' + + str(channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]), + ) + # Check to make sure the latest events are returned + self.assertEqual( + [ + event["event_id"] + for event in channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["timeline"] + ], + [ + event_response2["event_id"], + event_response3["event_id"], + ], + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["timeline"], + ) + + # All events are "live" + self.assertEqual( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["num_live"], + 2, + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1], + ) + + def test_rooms_newly_joined_incremental_sync(self) -> None: + """ + Test that when we make an incremental sync with a `newly_joined` `rooms`, we are + able to see some historical events before the `from_token`. + """ + user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass") + user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass") + user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass") + user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass") + + room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity before token1", tok=user2_tok) + event_response2 = self.helper.send( + room_id1, "activity before token2", tok=user2_tok + ) + + from_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token() + + # Join the room after the `from_token` which will make us consider this room as + # `newly_joined`. + user1_join_response = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok) + + # Send some events but don't send enough to saturate the `timeline_limit`. + # We want to later test that we only get the new events since the `next_pos` + event_response3 = self.helper.send( + room_id1, "activity after token3", tok=user2_tok + ) + event_response4 = self.helper.send( + room_id1, "activity after token4", tok=user2_tok + ) + + # The `timeline_limit` is set to 4 so we can at least see one historical event + # before the `from_token`. We should see historical events because this is a + # `newly_joined` room. + timeline_limit = 4 + # Make an incremental Sliding Sync request (what we're trying to test) + channel = self.make_request( + "POST", + self.sync_endpoint + + f"?pos={self.get_success(from_token.to_string(self.store))}", + { + "lists": { + "foo-list": { + "ranges": [[0, 1]], + "required_state": [], + "timeline_limit": timeline_limit, + } + } + }, + access_token=user1_tok, + ) + self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200, channel.json_body) + + # We should see the new events and the rest should be filled with historical + # events which will make us `limited=True` since there are more to paginate to. + self.assertEqual( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["limited"], + True, + f"Our `timeline_limit` was {timeline_limit} " + + f'and {len(channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["timeline"])} events were returned in the timeline. ' + + str(channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]), + ) + # Check to make sure that the "live" and historical events are returned + self.assertEqual( + [ + event["event_id"] + for event in channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["timeline"] + ], + [ + event_response2["event_id"], + user1_join_response["event_id"], + event_response3["event_id"], + event_response4["event_id"], + ], + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["timeline"], + ) + + # Only events after the `from_token` are "live" (join, event3, event4) + self.assertEqual( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["num_live"], + 3, + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1], + ) + + def test_rooms_invite_shared_history_initial_sync(self) -> None: + """ + Test that `rooms` we are invited to have some stripped `invite_state` during an + initial sync. + + This is an `invite` room so we should only have `stripped_state` (no `timeline`) + but we also shouldn't see any timeline events because the history visiblity is + `shared` and we haven't joined the room yet. + """ + user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass") + user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass") + user1 = UserID.from_string(user1_id) + user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass") + user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass") + user2 = UserID.from_string(user2_id) + + room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok) + # Ensure we're testing with a room with `shared` history visibility which means + # history visible until you actually join the room. + history_visibility_response = self.helper.get_state( + room_id1, EventTypes.RoomHistoryVisibility, tok=user2_tok + ) + self.assertEqual( + history_visibility_response.get("history_visibility"), + HistoryVisibility.SHARED, + ) + + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity before1", tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity before2", tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.invite(room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after3", tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after4", tok=user2_tok) + + # Make the Sliding Sync request + channel = self.make_request( + "POST", + self.sync_endpoint, + { + "lists": { + "foo-list": { + "ranges": [[0, 1]], + "required_state": [], + "timeline_limit": 3, + } + } + }, + access_token=user1_tok, + ) + self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200, channel.json_body) + + # `timeline` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` + self.assertIsNone( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("timeline"), + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1], + ) + # `num_live` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway) + self.assertIsNone( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("num_live"), + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1], + ) + # `limited` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway) + self.assertIsNone( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("limited"), + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1], + ) + # `prev_batch` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway) + self.assertIsNone( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("prev_batch"), + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1], + ) + # We should have some `stripped_state` so the potential joiner can identify the + # room (we don't care about the order). + self.assertCountEqual( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["invite_state"], + [ + { + "content": {"creator": user2_id, "room_version": "10"}, + "sender": user2_id, + "state_key": "", + "type": "m.room.create", + }, + { + "content": {"join_rule": "public"}, + "sender": user2_id, + "state_key": "", + "type": "m.room.join_rules", + }, + { + "content": {"displayname": user2.localpart, "membership": "join"}, + "sender": user2_id, + "state_key": user2_id, + "type": "m.room.member", + }, + { + "content": {"displayname": user1.localpart, "membership": "invite"}, + "sender": user2_id, + "state_key": user1_id, + "type": "m.room.member", + }, + ], + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["invite_state"], + ) + + def test_rooms_invite_shared_history_incremental_sync(self) -> None: + """ + Test that `rooms` we are invited to have some stripped `invite_state` during an + incremental sync. + + This is an `invite` room so we should only have `stripped_state` (no `timeline`) + but we also shouldn't see any timeline events because the history visiblity is + `shared` and we haven't joined the room yet. + """ + user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass") + user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass") + user1 = UserID.from_string(user1_id) + user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass") + user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass") + user2 = UserID.from_string(user2_id) + + room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok) + # Ensure we're testing with a room with `shared` history visibility which means + # history visible until you actually join the room. + history_visibility_response = self.helper.get_state( + room_id1, EventTypes.RoomHistoryVisibility, tok=user2_tok + ) + self.assertEqual( + history_visibility_response.get("history_visibility"), + HistoryVisibility.SHARED, + ) + + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity before invite1", tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity before invite2", tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.invite(room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after invite3", tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after invite4", tok=user2_tok) + + from_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token() + + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after token5", tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after toekn6", tok=user2_tok) + + # Make the Sliding Sync request + channel = self.make_request( + "POST", + self.sync_endpoint + + f"?pos={self.get_success(from_token.to_string(self.store))}", + { + "lists": { + "foo-list": { + "ranges": [[0, 1]], + "required_state": [], + "timeline_limit": 3, + } + } + }, + access_token=user1_tok, + ) + self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200, channel.json_body) + + # `timeline` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` + self.assertIsNone( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("timeline"), + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1], + ) + # `num_live` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway) + self.assertIsNone( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("num_live"), + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1], + ) + # `limited` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway) + self.assertIsNone( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("limited"), + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1], + ) + # `prev_batch` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway) + self.assertIsNone( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("prev_batch"), + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1], + ) + # We should have some `stripped_state` so the potential joiner can identify the + # room (we don't care about the order). + self.assertCountEqual( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["invite_state"], + [ + { + "content": {"creator": user2_id, "room_version": "10"}, + "sender": user2_id, + "state_key": "", + "type": "m.room.create", + }, + { + "content": {"join_rule": "public"}, + "sender": user2_id, + "state_key": "", + "type": "m.room.join_rules", + }, + { + "content": {"displayname": user2.localpart, "membership": "join"}, + "sender": user2_id, + "state_key": user2_id, + "type": "m.room.member", + }, + { + "content": {"displayname": user1.localpart, "membership": "invite"}, + "sender": user2_id, + "state_key": user1_id, + "type": "m.room.member", + }, + ], + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["invite_state"], + ) + + def test_rooms_invite_world_readable_history_initial_sync(self) -> None: + """ + Test that `rooms` we are invited to have some stripped `invite_state` during an + initial sync. + + This is an `invite` room so we should only have `stripped_state` (no `timeline`) + but depending on the semantics we decide, we could potentially see some + historical events before/after the `from_token` because the history is + `world_readable`. Same situation for events after the `from_token` if the + history visibility was set to `invited`. + """ + user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass") + user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass") + user1 = UserID.from_string(user1_id) + user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass") + user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass") + user2 = UserID.from_string(user2_id) + + room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as( + user2_id, + tok=user2_tok, + extra_content={ + "preset": "public_chat", + "initial_state": [ + { + "content": { + "history_visibility": HistoryVisibility.WORLD_READABLE + }, + "state_key": "", + "type": EventTypes.RoomHistoryVisibility, + } + ], + }, + ) + # Ensure we're testing with a room with `world_readable` history visibility + # which means events are visible to anyone even without membership. + history_visibility_response = self.helper.get_state( + room_id1, EventTypes.RoomHistoryVisibility, tok=user2_tok + ) + self.assertEqual( + history_visibility_response.get("history_visibility"), + HistoryVisibility.WORLD_READABLE, + ) + + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity before1", tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity before2", tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.invite(room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after3", tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after4", tok=user2_tok) + + # Make the Sliding Sync request + channel = self.make_request( + "POST", + self.sync_endpoint, + { + "lists": { + "foo-list": { + "ranges": [[0, 1]], + "required_state": [], + # Large enough to see the latest events and before the invite + "timeline_limit": 4, + } + } + }, + access_token=user1_tok, + ) + self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200, channel.json_body) + + # `timeline` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` + self.assertIsNone( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("timeline"), + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1], + ) + # `num_live` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway) + self.assertIsNone( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("num_live"), + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1], + ) + # `limited` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway) + self.assertIsNone( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("limited"), + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1], + ) + # `prev_batch` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway) + self.assertIsNone( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("prev_batch"), + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1], + ) + # We should have some `stripped_state` so the potential joiner can identify the + # room (we don't care about the order). + self.assertCountEqual( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["invite_state"], + [ + { + "content": {"creator": user2_id, "room_version": "10"}, + "sender": user2_id, + "state_key": "", + "type": "m.room.create", + }, + { + "content": {"join_rule": "public"}, + "sender": user2_id, + "state_key": "", + "type": "m.room.join_rules", + }, + { + "content": {"displayname": user2.localpart, "membership": "join"}, + "sender": user2_id, + "state_key": user2_id, + "type": "m.room.member", + }, + { + "content": {"displayname": user1.localpart, "membership": "invite"}, + "sender": user2_id, + "state_key": user1_id, + "type": "m.room.member", + }, + ], + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["invite_state"], + ) + + def test_rooms_invite_world_readable_history_incremental_sync(self) -> None: + """ + Test that `rooms` we are invited to have some stripped `invite_state` during an + incremental sync. + + This is an `invite` room so we should only have `stripped_state` (no `timeline`) + but depending on the semantics we decide, we could potentially see some + historical events before/after the `from_token` because the history is + `world_readable`. Same situation for events after the `from_token` if the + history visibility was set to `invited`. + """ + user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass") + user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass") + user1 = UserID.from_string(user1_id) + user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass") + user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass") + user2 = UserID.from_string(user2_id) + + room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as( + user2_id, + tok=user2_tok, + extra_content={ + "preset": "public_chat", + "initial_state": [ + { + "content": { + "history_visibility": HistoryVisibility.WORLD_READABLE + }, + "state_key": "", + "type": EventTypes.RoomHistoryVisibility, + } + ], + }, + ) + # Ensure we're testing with a room with `world_readable` history visibility + # which means events are visible to anyone even without membership. + history_visibility_response = self.helper.get_state( + room_id1, EventTypes.RoomHistoryVisibility, tok=user2_tok + ) + self.assertEqual( + history_visibility_response.get("history_visibility"), + HistoryVisibility.WORLD_READABLE, + ) + + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity before invite1", tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity before invite2", tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.invite(room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after invite3", tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after invite4", tok=user2_tok) + + from_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token() + + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after token5", tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after toekn6", tok=user2_tok) + + # Make the Sliding Sync request + channel = self.make_request( + "POST", + self.sync_endpoint + + f"?pos={self.get_success(from_token.to_string(self.store))}", + { + "lists": { + "foo-list": { + "ranges": [[0, 1]], + "required_state": [], + # Large enough to see the latest events and before the invite + "timeline_limit": 4, + } + } + }, + access_token=user1_tok, + ) + self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200, channel.json_body) + + # `timeline` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` + self.assertIsNone( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("timeline"), + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1], + ) + # `num_live` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway) + self.assertIsNone( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("num_live"), + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1], + ) + # `limited` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway) + self.assertIsNone( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("limited"), + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1], + ) + # `prev_batch` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway) + self.assertIsNone( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("prev_batch"), + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1], + ) + # We should have some `stripped_state` so the potential joiner can identify the + # room (we don't care about the order). + self.assertCountEqual( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["invite_state"], + [ + { + "content": {"creator": user2_id, "room_version": "10"}, + "sender": user2_id, + "state_key": "", + "type": "m.room.create", + }, + { + "content": {"join_rule": "public"}, + "sender": user2_id, + "state_key": "", + "type": "m.room.join_rules", + }, + { + "content": {"displayname": user2.localpart, "membership": "join"}, + "sender": user2_id, + "state_key": user2_id, + "type": "m.room.member", + }, + { + "content": {"displayname": user1.localpart, "membership": "invite"}, + "sender": user2_id, + "state_key": user1_id, + "type": "m.room.member", + }, + ], + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["invite_state"], + ) + + def test_rooms_ban_initial_sync(self) -> None: + """ + Test that `rooms` we are banned from in an intial sync only allows us to see + timeline events up to the ban event. + """ + user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass") + user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass") + user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass") + user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass") + + room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity before1", tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity before2", tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok) + + event_response3 = self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after3", tok=user2_tok) + event_response4 = self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after4", tok=user2_tok) + user1_ban_response = self.helper.ban( + room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok + ) + + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after5", tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after6", tok=user2_tok) + + # Make the Sliding Sync request + channel = self.make_request( + "POST", + self.sync_endpoint, + { + "lists": { + "foo-list": { + "ranges": [[0, 1]], + "required_state": [], + "timeline_limit": 3, + } + } + }, + access_token=user1_tok, + ) + self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200, channel.json_body) + + # We should see events before the ban but not after + self.assertEqual( + [ + event["event_id"] + for event in channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["timeline"] + ], + [ + event_response3["event_id"], + event_response4["event_id"], + user1_ban_response["event_id"], + ], + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["timeline"], + ) + # No "live" events in an initial sync (no `from_token` to define the "live" + # range) + self.assertEqual( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["num_live"], + 0, + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1], + ) + # There are more events to paginate to + self.assertEqual( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["limited"], + True, + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1], + ) + + def test_rooms_ban_incremental_sync1(self) -> None: + """ + Test that `rooms` we are banned from during the next incremental sync only + allows us to see timeline events up to the ban event. + """ + user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass") + user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass") + user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass") + user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass") + + room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity before1", tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity before2", tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok) + + from_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token() + + event_response3 = self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after3", tok=user2_tok) + event_response4 = self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after4", tok=user2_tok) + # The ban is within the token range (between the `from_token` and the sliding + # sync request) + user1_ban_response = self.helper.ban( + room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok + ) + + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after5", tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after6", tok=user2_tok) + + # Make the Sliding Sync request + channel = self.make_request( + "POST", + self.sync_endpoint + + f"?pos={self.get_success(from_token.to_string(self.store))}", + { + "lists": { + "foo-list": { + "ranges": [[0, 1]], + "required_state": [], + "timeline_limit": 4, + } + } + }, + access_token=user1_tok, + ) + self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200, channel.json_body) + + # We should see events before the ban but not after + self.assertEqual( + [ + event["event_id"] + for event in channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["timeline"] + ], + [ + event_response3["event_id"], + event_response4["event_id"], + user1_ban_response["event_id"], + ], + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["timeline"], + ) + # All live events in the incremental sync + self.assertEqual( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["num_live"], + 3, + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1], + ) + # There aren't anymore events to paginate to in this range + self.assertEqual( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["limited"], + False, + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1], + ) + + def test_rooms_ban_incremental_sync2(self) -> None: + """ + Test that `rooms` we are banned from before the incremental sync don't return + any events in the timeline. + """ + user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass") + user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass") + user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass") + user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass") + + room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity before1", tok=user2_tok) + self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok) + + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after2", tok=user2_tok) + # The ban is before we get our `from_token` + self.helper.ban(room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok) + + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after3", tok=user2_tok) + + from_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token() + + self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after4", tok=user2_tok) + + # Make the Sliding Sync request + channel = self.make_request( + "POST", + self.sync_endpoint + + f"?pos={self.get_success(from_token.to_string(self.store))}", + { + "lists": { + "foo-list": { + "ranges": [[0, 1]], + "required_state": [], + "timeline_limit": 4, + } + } + }, + access_token=user1_tok, + ) + self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200, channel.json_body) + + # Nothing to see for this banned user in the room in the token range + self.assertEqual( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["timeline"], + [], + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["timeline"], + ) + # No events returned in the timeline so nothing is "live" + self.assertEqual( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["num_live"], + 0, + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1], + ) + # There aren't anymore events to paginate to in this range + self.assertEqual( + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1]["limited"], + False, + channel.json_body["rooms"][room_id1], + ) |