summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/tests/push/test_push_rule_evaluator.py
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/push/test_push_rule_evaluator.py')
-rw-r--r--tests/push/test_push_rule_evaluator.py108
1 files changed, 35 insertions, 73 deletions
diff --git a/tests/push/test_push_rule_evaluator.py b/tests/push/test_push_rule_evaluator.py

index 0554d247bc..ff5a9a66f5 100644 --- a/tests/push/test_push_rule_evaluator.py +++ b/tests/push/test_push_rule_evaluator.py
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ # See the License for the specific language governing permissions and # limitations under the License. -from typing import Any, Dict, List, Optional, Set, Union, cast +from typing import Any, Dict, List, Optional, Union, cast import frozendict @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ class FlattenDictTestCase(unittest.TestCase): self.assertEqual({"m.foo.b\\ar": "abc"}, _flatten_dict(input)) self.assertEqual( {"m\\.foo.b\\\\ar": "abc"}, - _flatten_dict(input, msc3783_escape_event_match_key=True), + _flatten_dict(input, msc3873_escape_event_match_key=True), ) def test_non_string(self) -> None: @@ -147,9 +147,6 @@ class PushRuleEvaluatorTestCase(unittest.TestCase): self, content: JsonMapping, *, - has_mentions: bool = False, - user_mentions: Optional[Set[str]] = None, - room_mention: bool = False, related_events: Optional[JsonDict] = None, ) -> PushRuleEvaluator: event = FrozenEvent( @@ -168,9 +165,7 @@ class PushRuleEvaluatorTestCase(unittest.TestCase): power_levels: Dict[str, Union[int, Dict[str, int]]] = {} return PushRuleEvaluator( _flatten_dict(event), - has_mentions, - user_mentions or set(), - room_mention, + False, room_member_count, sender_power_level, cast(Dict[str, int], power_levels.get("notifications", {})), @@ -178,7 +173,6 @@ class PushRuleEvaluatorTestCase(unittest.TestCase): related_event_match_enabled=True, room_version_feature_flags=event.room_version.msc3931_push_features, msc3931_enabled=True, - msc3758_exact_event_match=True, msc3966_exact_event_property_contains=True, ) @@ -206,53 +200,6 @@ class PushRuleEvaluatorTestCase(unittest.TestCase): # A display name with spaces should work fine. self.assertTrue(evaluator.matches(condition, "@user:test", "foo bar")) - def test_user_mentions(self) -> None: - """Check for user mentions.""" - condition = {"kind": "org.matrix.msc3952.is_user_mention"} - - # No mentions shouldn't match. - evaluator = self._get_evaluator({}, has_mentions=True) - self.assertFalse(evaluator.matches(condition, "@user:test", None)) - - # An empty set shouldn't match - evaluator = self._get_evaluator({}, has_mentions=True, user_mentions=set()) - self.assertFalse(evaluator.matches(condition, "@user:test", None)) - - # The Matrix ID appearing anywhere in the mentions list should match - evaluator = self._get_evaluator( - {}, has_mentions=True, user_mentions={"@user:test"} - ) - self.assertTrue(evaluator.matches(condition, "@user:test", None)) - - evaluator = self._get_evaluator( - {}, has_mentions=True, user_mentions={"@another:test", "@user:test"} - ) - self.assertTrue(evaluator.matches(condition, "@user:test", None)) - - # Note that invalid data is tested at tests.push.test_bulk_push_rule_evaluator.TestBulkPushRuleEvaluator.test_mentions - # since the BulkPushRuleEvaluator is what handles data sanitisation. - - def test_room_mentions(self) -> None: - """Check for room mentions.""" - condition = {"kind": "org.matrix.msc3952.is_room_mention"} - - # No room mention shouldn't match. - evaluator = self._get_evaluator({}, has_mentions=True) - self.assertFalse(evaluator.matches(condition, None, None)) - - # Room mention should match. - evaluator = self._get_evaluator({}, has_mentions=True, room_mention=True) - self.assertTrue(evaluator.matches(condition, None, None)) - - # A room mention and user mention is valid. - evaluator = self._get_evaluator( - {}, has_mentions=True, user_mentions={"@another:test"}, room_mention=True - ) - self.assertTrue(evaluator.matches(condition, None, None)) - - # Note that invalid data is tested at tests.push.test_bulk_push_rule_evaluator.TestBulkPushRuleEvaluator.test_mentions - # since the BulkPushRuleEvaluator is what handles data sanitisation. - def _assert_matches( self, condition: JsonDict, content: JsonMapping, msg: Optional[str] = None ) -> None: @@ -424,12 +371,39 @@ class PushRuleEvaluatorTestCase(unittest.TestCase): "pattern should not match before a newline", ) + def test_event_match_pattern(self) -> None: + """Check that event_match conditions do not use a "pattern_type" from user data.""" + + # The pattern_type should not be deserialized into anything valid. + condition = { + "kind": "event_match", + "key": "content.value", + "pattern_type": "user_id", + } + self._assert_not_matches( + condition, + {"value": "@user:test"}, + "should not be possible to pass a pattern_type in", + ) + + # This is an internal-only condition which shouldn't get deserialized. + condition = { + "kind": "event_match_type", + "key": "content.value", + "pattern_type": "user_id", + } + self._assert_not_matches( + condition, + {"value": "@user:test"}, + "should not be possible to pass a pattern_type in", + ) + def test_exact_event_match_string(self) -> None: """Check that exact_event_match conditions work as expected for strings.""" # Test against a string value. condition = { - "kind": "com.beeper.msc3758.exact_event_match", + "kind": "event_property_is", "key": "content.value", "value": "foobaz", } @@ -467,11 +441,7 @@ class PushRuleEvaluatorTestCase(unittest.TestCase): """Check that exact_event_match conditions work as expected for booleans.""" # Test against a True boolean value. - condition = { - "kind": "com.beeper.msc3758.exact_event_match", - "key": "content.value", - "value": True, - } + condition = {"kind": "event_property_is", "key": "content.value", "value": True} self._assert_matches( condition, {"value": True}, @@ -491,7 +461,7 @@ class PushRuleEvaluatorTestCase(unittest.TestCase): # Test against a False boolean value. condition = { - "kind": "com.beeper.msc3758.exact_event_match", + "kind": "event_property_is", "key": "content.value", "value": False, } @@ -516,11 +486,7 @@ class PushRuleEvaluatorTestCase(unittest.TestCase): def test_exact_event_match_null(self) -> None: """Check that exact_event_match conditions work as expected for null.""" - condition = { - "kind": "com.beeper.msc3758.exact_event_match", - "key": "content.value", - "value": None, - } + condition = {"kind": "event_property_is", "key": "content.value", "value": None} self._assert_matches( condition, {"value": None}, @@ -536,11 +502,7 @@ class PushRuleEvaluatorTestCase(unittest.TestCase): def test_exact_event_match_integer(self) -> None: """Check that exact_event_match conditions work as expected for integers.""" - condition = { - "kind": "com.beeper.msc3758.exact_event_match", - "key": "content.value", - "value": 1, - } + condition = {"kind": "event_property_is", "key": "content.value", "value": 1} self._assert_matches( condition, {"value": 1},