summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/synapse/storage/databases/main/events.py
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'synapse/storage/databases/main/events.py')
-rw-r--r--synapse/storage/databases/main/events.py243
1 files changed, 122 insertions, 121 deletions
diff --git a/synapse/storage/databases/main/events.py b/synapse/storage/databases/main/events.py

index 60c92e5804..f3dbe5bba7 100644 --- a/synapse/storage/databases/main/events.py +++ b/synapse/storage/databases/main/events.py
@@ -163,6 +163,15 @@ class SlidingSyncMembershipInfo: sender: str membership_event_id: str membership: str + + +@attr.s(slots=True, auto_attribs=True) +class SlidingSyncMembershipInfoWithEventPos(SlidingSyncMembershipInfo): + """ + SlidingSyncMembershipInfo + `stream_ordering`/`instance_name` of the membership + event + """ + membership_event_stream_ordering: int membership_event_instance_name: str @@ -170,17 +179,6 @@ class SlidingSyncMembershipInfo: @attr.s(slots=True, auto_attribs=True) class SlidingSyncTableChanges: room_id: str - # `stream_ordering` of the most recent event being persisted in the room. This doesn't - # need to be perfect, we just need *some* answer that points to a real event in the - # room in case we are the first ones inserting into the `sliding_sync_joined_rooms` - # table because of the `NON NULL` constraint on `event_stream_ordering`. In reality, - # `_update_sliding_sync_tables_with_new_persisted_events_txn()` is run after - # `_update_current_state_txn()` whenever a new event is persisted to update it to the - # correct latest value. - # - # This should be *some* value that points to a real event in the room if we are - # still joined to the room and some state is changing (`to_insert` or `to_delete`). - joined_room_best_effort_most_recent_stream_ordering: Optional[int] # If the row doesn't exist in the `sliding_sync_joined_rooms` table, we need to # fully-insert it which means we also need to include a `bump_stamp` value to use # for the row. This should only be populated when we're trying to fully-insert a @@ -401,6 +399,9 @@ class PersistEventsStore: `stream_ordering`). delta_state: Deltas that are going to be used to update the `current_state_events` table. Changes to the current state of the room. + + Returns: + SlidingSyncTableChanges """ to_insert = delta_state.to_insert to_delete = delta_state.to_delete @@ -410,7 +411,6 @@ class PersistEventsStore: if not to_insert and not to_delete: return SlidingSyncTableChanges( room_id=room_id, - joined_room_best_effort_most_recent_stream_ordering=None, joined_room_bump_stamp_to_fully_insert=None, joined_room_updates={}, membership_snapshot_shared_insert_values={}, @@ -469,24 +469,24 @@ class PersistEventsStore: membership_event_id, user_id, ) in membership_event_id_to_user_id_map.items(): - # We should only be seeing events with `stream_ordering`/`instance_name` assigned by this point - membership_event_stream_ordering = membership_event_map[ - membership_event_id - ].internal_metadata.stream_ordering - assert membership_event_stream_ordering is not None - membership_event_instance_name = membership_event_map[ - membership_event_id - ].internal_metadata.instance_name - assert membership_event_instance_name is not None - membership_infos_to_insert_membership_snapshots.append( + # XXX: We don't use `SlidingSyncMembershipInfoWithEventPos` here + # because we're sourcing the event from `events_and_contexts`, we + # can't rely on `stream_ordering`/`instance_name` being correct. We + # could be working with events that were previously persisted as an + # `outlier` with one `stream_ordering` but are now being persisted + # again and de-outliered and assigned a different `stream_ordering` + # that won't end up being used. Since we call + # `_calculate_sliding_sync_table_changes()` before + # `_update_outliers_txn()` which fixes this discrepancy (always use + # the `stream_ordering` from the first time it was persisted), we're + # working with an unreliable `stream_ordering` value that will + # possibly be unused and not make it into the `events` table. SlidingSyncMembershipInfo( user_id=user_id, sender=membership_event_map[membership_event_id].sender, membership_event_id=membership_event_id, membership=membership_event_map[membership_event_id].membership, - membership_event_stream_ordering=membership_event_stream_ordering, - membership_event_instance_name=membership_event_instance_name, ) ) @@ -568,7 +568,6 @@ class PersistEventsStore: # `_update_sliding_sync_tables_with_new_persisted_events_txn()`) # joined_room_updates: SlidingSyncStateInsertValues = {} - best_effort_most_recent_stream_ordering: Optional[int] = None bump_stamp_to_fully_insert: Optional[int] = None if not delta_state.no_longer_in_room: current_state_ids_map = {} @@ -632,9 +631,7 @@ class PersistEventsStore: # Otherwise, we need to find a couple events that we were reset to. if missing_event_ids: - remaining_events = await self.store.get_events( - current_state_ids_map.values() - ) + remaining_events = await self.store.get_events(missing_event_ids) # There shouldn't be any missing events assert ( remaining_events.keys() == missing_event_ids @@ -657,52 +654,9 @@ class PersistEventsStore: elif state_key == (EventTypes.Name, ""): joined_room_updates["room_name"] = None - # Figure out `best_effort_most_recent_stream_ordering`. This doesn't need to - # be perfect, we just need *some* answer that points to a real event in the - # room in case we are the first ones inserting into the - # `sliding_sync_joined_rooms` table because of the `NON NULL` constraint on - # `event_stream_ordering`. In reality, - # `_update_sliding_sync_tables_with_new_persisted_events_txn()` is run after - # `_update_current_state_txn()` whenever a new event is persisted to update - # it to the correct latest value. - # - if len(events_and_contexts) > 0: - # Since the list is sorted ascending by `stream_ordering`, the last event - # should have the highest `stream_ordering`. - best_effort_most_recent_stream_ordering = events_and_contexts[-1][ - 0 - ].internal_metadata.stream_ordering - else: - # If there are no `events_and_contexts`, we assume it's one of two scenarios: - # 1. If there are new state `to_insert` but no `events_and_contexts`, - # then it's a state reset. - # 2. Otherwise, it's some partial-state room re-syncing the current state and - # going through un-partial process. - # - # Either way, we assume no new events are being persisted and we can - # find the latest already in the database. Since this is a best-effort - # value, we don't need to be perfect although I think we're pretty close - # here. - most_recent_event_pos_results = ( - await self.store.get_last_event_pos_in_room( - room_id, event_types=None - ) - ) - assert most_recent_event_pos_results, ( - f"We should not be seeing `None` here because we are still in the room ({room_id}) and " - + "it should at-least have a join membership event that's keeping us here." - ) - best_effort_most_recent_stream_ordering = most_recent_event_pos_results[ - 1 - ].stream - - # We should have found a value if we are still in the room - assert best_effort_most_recent_stream_ordering is not None - return SlidingSyncTableChanges( room_id=room_id, # For `sliding_sync_joined_rooms` - joined_room_best_effort_most_recent_stream_ordering=best_effort_most_recent_stream_ordering, joined_room_bump_stamp_to_fully_insert=bump_stamp_to_fully_insert, joined_room_updates=joined_room_updates, # For `sliding_sync_membership_snapshots` @@ -1773,31 +1727,53 @@ class PersistEventsStore: # # We only need to update when one of the relevant state values has changed if sliding_sync_table_changes.joined_room_updates: - # This should be *some* value that points to a real event in the room if - # we are still joined to the room. - assert ( - sliding_sync_table_changes.joined_room_best_effort_most_recent_stream_ordering - is not None + sliding_sync_updates_keys = ( + sliding_sync_table_changes.joined_room_updates.keys() + ) + sliding_sync_updates_values = ( + sliding_sync_table_changes.joined_room_updates.values() ) - self.db_pool.simple_upsert_txn( - txn, - table="sliding_sync_joined_rooms", - keyvalues={"room_id": room_id}, - values=sliding_sync_table_changes.joined_room_updates, - insertion_values={ - # The reason we're only *inserting* (not *updating*) - # `event_stream_ordering` here is because the column has a `NON - # NULL` constraint and we need *some* answer. And if the row - # already exists, it already has the correct value and it's - # better to just rely on - # `_update_sliding_sync_tables_with_new_persisted_events_txn()` - # to do the right thing (same for `bump_stamp`). - "event_stream_ordering": sliding_sync_table_changes.joined_room_best_effort_most_recent_stream_ordering, - # If we're trying to fully-insert a row, we need to provide a - # value for `bump_stamp` if it exists for the room. - "bump_stamp": sliding_sync_table_changes.joined_room_bump_stamp_to_fully_insert, - }, + args: List[Any] = [ + room_id, + room_id, + sliding_sync_table_changes.joined_room_bump_stamp_to_fully_insert, + ] + args.extend(iter(sliding_sync_updates_values)) + + # XXX: We use a sub-query for `stream_ordering` because it's unreliable to + # pre-calculate from `events_and_contexts` at the time when + # `_calculate_sliding_sync_table_changes()` is ran. We could be working + # with events that were previously persisted as an `outlier` with one + # `stream_ordering` but are now being persisted again and de-outliered + # and assigned a different `stream_ordering`. Since we call + # `_calculate_sliding_sync_table_changes()` before + # `_update_outliers_txn()` which fixes this discrepancy (always use the + # `stream_ordering` from the first time it was persisted), we're working + # with an unreliable `stream_ordering` value that will possibly be + # unused and not make it into the `events` table. + # + # We don't update `event_stream_ordering` `ON CONFLICT` because it's + # simpler and we can just rely on + # `_update_sliding_sync_tables_with_new_persisted_events_txn()` to do + # the right thing (same for `bump_stamp`). The only reason we're + # inserting `event_stream_ordering` here is because the column has a + # `NON NULL` constraint and we need some answer. + txn.execute( + f""" + INSERT INTO sliding_sync_joined_rooms + (room_id, event_stream_ordering, bump_stamp, {", ".join(sliding_sync_updates_keys)}) + VALUES ( + ?, + (SELECT stream_ordering FROM events WHERE room_id = ? ORDER BY stream_ordering DESC LIMIT 1), + ?, + {", ".join("?" for _ in sliding_sync_updates_values)} + ) + ON CONFLICT (room_id) + DO UPDATE SET + {", ".join(f"{key} = EXCLUDED.{key}" for key in sliding_sync_updates_keys)} + """, + args, ) # We now update `local_current_membership`. We do this regardless @@ -1854,38 +1830,63 @@ class PersistEventsStore: if sliding_sync_table_changes.to_insert_membership_snapshots: # Update the `sliding_sync_membership_snapshots` table # - # We need to insert/update regardless of whether we have `sliding_sync_snapshot_keys` - # because there are other fields in the `ON CONFLICT` upsert to run (see - # inherit case above for more context when this happens). - self.db_pool.simple_upsert_many_txn( - txn=txn, - table="sliding_sync_membership_snapshots", - key_names=("room_id", "user_id"), - key_values=[ - (room_id, membership_info.user_id) - for membership_info in sliding_sync_table_changes.to_insert_membership_snapshots - ], - value_names=[ - "sender", - "membership_event_id", - "membership", - "event_stream_ordering", - "event_instance_name", - ] - + list( - sliding_sync_table_changes.membership_snapshot_shared_insert_values.keys() - ), - value_values=[ + sliding_sync_snapshot_keys = ( + sliding_sync_table_changes.membership_snapshot_shared_insert_values.keys() + ) + sliding_sync_snapshot_values = ( + sliding_sync_table_changes.membership_snapshot_shared_insert_values.values() + ) + # We need to insert/update regardless of whether we have + # `sliding_sync_snapshot_keys` because there are other fields in the `ON + # CONFLICT` upsert to run (see inherit case (explained in + # `_calculate_sliding_sync_table_changes()`) for more context when this + # happens). + # + # XXX: We use a sub-query for `stream_ordering` because it's unreliable to + # pre-calculate from `events_and_contexts` at the time when + # `_calculate_sliding_sync_table_changes()` is ran. We could be working with + # events that were previously persisted as an `outlier` with one + # `stream_ordering` but are now being persisted again and de-outliered and + # assigned a different `stream_ordering` that won't end up being used. Since + # we call `_calculate_sliding_sync_table_changes()` before + # `_update_outliers_txn()` which fixes this discrepancy (always use the + # `stream_ordering` from the first time it was persisted), we're working + # with an unreliable `stream_ordering` value that will possibly be unused + # and not make it into the `events` table. + txn.execute_batch( + f""" + INSERT INTO sliding_sync_membership_snapshots + (room_id, user_id, sender, membership_event_id, membership, event_stream_ordering, event_instance_name + {("," + ", ".join(sliding_sync_snapshot_keys)) if sliding_sync_snapshot_keys else ""}) + VALUES ( + ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, + (SELECT stream_ordering FROM events WHERE event_id = ?), + (SELECT instance_name FROM events WHERE event_id = ?) + {("," + ", ".join("?" for _ in sliding_sync_snapshot_values)) if sliding_sync_snapshot_values else ""} + ) + ON CONFLICT (room_id, user_id) + DO UPDATE SET + sender = EXCLUDED.sender, + membership_event_id = EXCLUDED.membership_event_id, + membership = EXCLUDED.membership, + event_stream_ordering = EXCLUDED.event_stream_ordering + {("," + ", ".join(f"{key} = EXCLUDED.{key}" for key in sliding_sync_snapshot_keys)) if sliding_sync_snapshot_keys else ""} + """, + [ [ + room_id, + membership_info.user_id, membership_info.sender, membership_info.membership_event_id, membership_info.membership, - membership_info.membership_event_stream_ordering, - membership_info.membership_event_instance_name, + # XXX: We do not use `membership_info.membership_event_stream_ordering` here + # because it is an unreliable value. See XXX note above. + membership_info.membership_event_id, + # XXX: We do not use `membership_info.membership_event_instance_name` here + # because it is an unreliable value. See XXX note above. + membership_info.membership_event_id, ] - + list( - sliding_sync_table_changes.membership_snapshot_shared_insert_values.values() - ) + + list(sliding_sync_snapshot_values) for membership_info in sliding_sync_table_changes.to_insert_membership_snapshots ], )