diff --git a/tests/test_event_auth.py b/tests/test_event_auth.py
index 1a4d078780..cf407c51cf 100644
--- a/tests/test_event_auth.py
+++ b/tests/test_event_auth.py
@@ -38,21 +38,19 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
}
# creator should be able to send state
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V1,
_random_state_event(creator),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
# joiner should not be able to send state
self.assertRaises(
AuthError,
- event_auth.check,
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event,
RoomVersions.V1,
_random_state_event(joiner),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
def test_state_default_level(self):
@@ -77,19 +75,17 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
# pleb should not be able to send state
self.assertRaises(
AuthError,
- event_auth.check,
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event,
RoomVersions.V1,
_random_state_event(pleb),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
),
# king should be able to send state
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V1,
_random_state_event(king),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
def test_alias_event(self):
@@ -102,37 +98,33 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
}
# creator should be able to send aliases
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V1,
_alias_event(creator),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
# Reject an event with no state key.
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V1,
_alias_event(creator, state_key=""),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
# If the domain of the sender does not match the state key, reject.
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V1,
_alias_event(creator, state_key="test.com"),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
# Note that the member does *not* need to be in the room.
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V1,
_alias_event(other),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
def test_msc2432_alias_event(self):
@@ -145,34 +137,30 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
}
# creator should be able to send aliases
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V6,
_alias_event(creator),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
# No particular checks are done on the state key.
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V6,
_alias_event(creator, state_key=""),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V6,
_alias_event(creator, state_key="test.com"),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
# Per standard auth rules, the member must be in the room.
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V6,
_alias_event(other),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
def test_msc2209(self):
@@ -192,20 +180,18 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
}
# pleb should be able to modify the notifications power level.
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V1,
_power_levels_event(pleb, {"notifications": {"room": 100}}),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
# But an MSC2209 room rejects this change.
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V6,
_power_levels_event(pleb, {"notifications": {"room": 100}}),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
def test_join_rules_public(self):
@@ -222,59 +208,53 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
}
# Check join.
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V6,
_join_event(pleb),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
# A user cannot be force-joined to a room.
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V6,
_member_event(pleb, "join", sender=creator),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
# Banned should be rejected.
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "ban")
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V6,
_join_event(pleb),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
# A user who left can re-join.
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "leave")
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V6,
_join_event(pleb),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
# A user can send a join if they're in the room.
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "join")
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V6,
_join_event(pleb),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
# A user can accept an invite.
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(
pleb, "invite", sender=creator
)
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V6,
_join_event(pleb),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
def test_join_rules_invite(self):
@@ -292,60 +272,54 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
# A join without an invite is rejected.
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V6,
_join_event(pleb),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
# A user cannot be force-joined to a room.
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V6,
_member_event(pleb, "join", sender=creator),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
# Banned should be rejected.
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "ban")
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V6,
_join_event(pleb),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
# A user who left cannot re-join.
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "leave")
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V6,
_join_event(pleb),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
# A user can send a join if they're in the room.
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "join")
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V6,
_join_event(pleb),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
# A user can accept an invite.
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(
pleb, "invite", sender=creator
)
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V6,
_join_event(pleb),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
def test_join_rules_msc3083_restricted(self):
@@ -370,11 +344,10 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
# Older room versions don't understand this join rule
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V6,
_join_event(pleb),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
# A properly formatted join event should work.
@@ -384,11 +357,10 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
EventContentFields.AUTHORISING_USER: "@creator:example.com"
},
)
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V8,
authorised_join_event,
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
# A join issued by a specific user works (i.e. the power level checks
@@ -400,7 +372,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
pl_auth_events[("m.room.member", "@inviter:foo.test")] = _join_event(
"@inviter:foo.test"
)
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V8,
_join_event(
pleb,
@@ -409,16 +381,14 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
},
),
pl_auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
# A join which is missing an authorised server is rejected.
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V8,
_join_event(pleb),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
# An join authorised by a user who is not in the room is rejected.
@@ -427,7 +397,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
creator, {"invite": 100, "users": {"@other:example.com": 150}}
)
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V8,
_join_event(
pleb,
@@ -436,13 +406,12 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
},
),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
# A user cannot be force-joined to a room. (This uses an event which
# *would* be valid, but is sent be a different user.)
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V8,
_member_event(
pleb,
@@ -453,36 +422,32 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
},
),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
# Banned should be rejected.
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "ban")
with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V8,
authorised_join_event,
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
# A user who left can re-join.
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "leave")
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V8,
authorised_join_event,
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
# A user can send a join if they're in the room. (This doesn't need to
# be authorised since the user is already joined.)
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "join")
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V8,
_join_event(pleb),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
# A user can accept an invite. (This doesn't need to be authorised since
@@ -490,11 +455,10 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(
pleb, "invite", sender=creator
)
- event_auth.check(
+ event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
RoomVersions.V8,
_join_event(pleb),
auth_events,
- do_sig_check=False,
)
|
