From 9dc3293e0b3a5cbf6fcc4a0cef7386b531190882 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Patrick Cloke Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 07:43:35 -0400 Subject: Consolidate the logic of delete_device/delete_devices. (#12970) By always using delete_devices and sometimes passing a list with a single device ID. Previously these methods had gotten out of sync with each other and it seems there's little benefit to the single-device variant. --- tests/handlers/test_device.py | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'tests') diff --git a/tests/handlers/test_device.py b/tests/handlers/test_device.py index 01ea7d2a42..b8b465d35b 100644 --- a/tests/handlers/test_device.py +++ b/tests/handlers/test_device.py @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ class DeviceTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase): self._record_users() # delete the device - self.get_success(self.handler.delete_device(user1, "abc")) + self.get_success(self.handler.delete_devices(user1, ["abc"])) # check the device was deleted self.get_failure(self.handler.get_device(user1, "abc"), NotFoundError) @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ class DeviceTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase): ) # delete the device - self.get_success(self.handler.delete_device(user1, "abc")) + self.get_success(self.handler.delete_devices(user1, ["abc"])) # check that the device_inbox was deleted res = self.get_success( -- cgit 1.5.1