From da957a60e8958b08a52bd1404a89cf9bbcd033e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 16:21:09 +0200 Subject: Ensure that we correctly auth events returned by `send_join` (#11012) This is the final piece of the jigsaw for #9595. As with other changes before this one (eg #10771), we need to make sure that we auth the auth events in the right order, and actually check that their predecessors haven't been rejected. To do this I've reused the existing code we use when persisting outliers elsewhere. I've removed the code for attempting to fetch missing auth_events - the events should have been present in the send_join response, so the likely reason they are missing is that we couldn't verify them, so requesting them again is unlikely to help. Instead, we simply drop any state which relies on those auth events, as we do at a backwards-extremity. See also matrix-org/complement#216 for a test for this. --- synapse/handlers/federation_event.py | 146 ++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-) (limited to 'synapse') diff --git a/synapse/handlers/federation_event.py b/synapse/handlers/federation_event.py index 3431a80ab4..9584d5bd46 100644 --- a/synapse/handlers/federation_event.py +++ b/synapse/handlers/federation_event.py @@ -361,6 +361,7 @@ class FederationEventHandler: # need to. await self._event_creation_handler.cache_joined_hosts_for_event(event, context) + await self._check_for_soft_fail(event, None, origin=origin) await self._run_push_actions_and_persist_event(event, context) return event, context @@ -402,29 +403,28 @@ class FederationEventHandler: """Persists the events returned by a send_join Checks the auth chain is valid (and passes auth checks) for the - state and event. Then persists the auth chain and state atomically. - Persists the event separately. Notifies about the persisted events - where appropriate. - - Will attempt to fetch missing auth events. + state and event. Then persists all of the events. + Notifies about the persisted events where appropriate. Args: origin: Where the events came from - room_id, + room_id: auth_events state event room_version: The room version we expect this room to have, and will raise if it doesn't match the version in the create event. + + Returns: + The stream ID after which all events have been persisted. + + Raises: + SynapseError if the response is in some way invalid. """ - events_to_context = {} for e in itertools.chain(auth_events, state): e.internal_metadata.outlier = True - events_to_context[e.event_id] = EventContext.for_outlier() - event_map = { - e.event_id: e for e in itertools.chain(auth_events, state, [event]) - } + event_map = {e.event_id: e for e in itertools.chain(auth_events, state)} create_event = None for e in auth_events: @@ -444,64 +444,36 @@ class FederationEventHandler: if room_version.identifier != room_version_id: raise SynapseError(400, "Room version mismatch") - missing_auth_events = set() - for e in itertools.chain(auth_events, state, [event]): - for e_id in e.auth_event_ids(): - if e_id not in event_map: - missing_auth_events.add(e_id) - - for e_id in missing_auth_events: - m_ev = await self._federation_client.get_pdu( - [origin], - e_id, - room_version=room_version, - outlier=True, - timeout=10000, - ) - if m_ev and m_ev.event_id == e_id: - event_map[e_id] = m_ev - else: - logger.info("Failed to find auth event %r", e_id) - - for e in itertools.chain(auth_events, state, [event]): - auth_for_e = [ - event_map[e_id] for e_id in e.auth_event_ids() if e_id in event_map - ] - if create_event: - auth_for_e.append(create_event) - - try: - validate_event_for_room_version(room_version, e) - check_auth_rules_for_event(room_version, e, auth_for_e) - except SynapseError as err: - # we may get SynapseErrors here as well as AuthErrors. For - # instance, there are a couple of (ancient) events in some - # rooms whose senders do not have the correct sigil; these - # cause SynapseErrors in auth.check. We don't want to give up - # the attempt to federate altogether in such cases. - - logger.warning("Rejecting %s because %s", e.event_id, err.msg) - - if e == event: - raise - events_to_context[e.event_id].rejected = RejectedReason.AUTH_ERROR - - if auth_events or state: - await self.persist_events_and_notify( - room_id, - [ - (e, events_to_context[e.event_id]) - for e in itertools.chain(auth_events, state) - ], + # filter out any events we have already seen + seen_remotes = await self._store.have_seen_events(room_id, event_map.keys()) + for s in seen_remotes: + event_map.pop(s, None) + + # persist the auth chain and state events. + # + # any invalid events here will be marked as rejected, and we'll carry on. + # + # any events whose auth events are missing (ie, not in the send_join response, + # and not already in our db) will just be ignored. This is correct behaviour, + # because the reason that auth_events are missing might be due to us being + # unable to validate their signatures. The fact that we can't validate their + # signatures right now doesn't mean that we will *never* be able to, so it + # is premature to reject them. + # + await self._auth_and_persist_outliers(room_id, event_map.values()) + + # and now persist the join event itself. + logger.info("Peristing join-via-remote %s", event) + with nested_logging_context(suffix=event.event_id): + context = await self._state_handler.compute_event_context( + event, old_state=state ) - new_event_context = await self._state_handler.compute_event_context( - event, old_state=state - ) + context = await self._check_event_auth(origin, event, context) + if context.rejected: + raise SynapseError(400, "Join event was rejected") - return await self.persist_events_and_notify( - room_id, [(event, new_event_context)] - ) + return await self.persist_events_and_notify(room_id, [(event, context)]) @log_function async def backfill( @@ -974,9 +946,15 @@ class FederationEventHandler: ) -> None: """Called when we have a new non-outlier event. - This is called when we have a new event to add to the room DAG - either directly - via a /send request, retrieved via get_missing_events after a /send request, or - backfilled after a client request. + This is called when we have a new event to add to the room DAG. This can be + due to: + * events received directly via a /send request + * events retrieved via get_missing_events after a /send request + * events backfilled after a client request. + + It's not currently used for events received from incoming send_{join,knock,leave} + requests (which go via on_send_membership_event), nor for joins created by a + remote join dance (which go via process_remote_join). We need to do auth checks and put it through the StateHandler. @@ -1012,11 +990,19 @@ class FederationEventHandler: logger.exception("Unexpected AuthError from _check_event_auth") raise FederationError("ERROR", e.code, e.msg, affected=event.event_id) + if not backfilled and not context.rejected: + # For new (non-backfilled and non-outlier) events we check if the event + # passes auth based on the current state. If it doesn't then we + # "soft-fail" the event. + await self._check_for_soft_fail(event, state, origin=origin) + await self._run_push_actions_and_persist_event(event, context, backfilled) - if backfilled: + if backfilled or context.rejected: return + await self._maybe_kick_guest_users(event) + # For encrypted messages we check that we know about the sending device, # if we don't then we mark the device cache for that user as stale. if event.type == EventTypes.Encrypted: @@ -1317,14 +1303,14 @@ class FederationEventHandler: for auth_event_id in event.auth_event_ids(): ae = persisted_events.get(auth_event_id) if not ae: + # the fact we can't find the auth event doesn't mean it doesn't + # exist, which means it is premature to reject `event`. Instead we + # just ignore it for now. logger.warning( - "Event %s relies on auth_event %s, which could not be found.", + "Dropping event %s, which relies on auth_event %s, which could not be found", event, auth_event_id, ) - # the fact we can't find the auth event doesn't mean it doesn't - # exist, which means it is premature to reject `event`. Instead we - # just ignore it for now. return None auth.append(ae) @@ -1447,10 +1433,6 @@ class FederationEventHandler: except AuthError as e: logger.warning("Failed auth resolution for %r because %s", event, e) context.rejected = RejectedReason.AUTH_ERROR - return context - - await self._check_for_soft_fail(event, state, backfilled, origin=origin) - await self._maybe_kick_guest_users(event) return context @@ -1470,7 +1452,6 @@ class FederationEventHandler: self, event: EventBase, state: Optional[Iterable[EventBase]], - backfilled: bool, origin: str, ) -> None: """Checks if we should soft fail the event; if so, marks the event as @@ -1479,15 +1460,8 @@ class FederationEventHandler: Args: event state: The state at the event if we don't have all the event's prev events - backfilled: Whether the event is from backfill origin: The host the event originates from. """ - # For new (non-backfilled and non-outlier) events we check if the event - # passes auth based on the current state. If it doesn't then we - # "soft-fail" the event. - if backfilled or event.internal_metadata.is_outlier(): - return - extrem_ids_list = await self._store.get_latest_event_ids_in_room(event.room_id) extrem_ids = set(extrem_ids_list) prev_event_ids = set(event.prev_event_ids()) -- cgit 1.4.1