| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* remove reference in comments to python3.6
* upgrade tox python env in script
* bump python version in example for completeness
* upgrade python version requirement in setup doc
* upgrade necessary python version in __init__.py
* upgrade python version in setup.py
* newsfragment
* drops refs to bionic and replace with focal
* bump refs to postgres 9.6 to 10
* fix hanging ci
* try installing tzdata first
* revert change made in b979f336
* ignore new random mypy error while debugging other error
* fix lint error for temporary workaround
* revert change to install list
* try passing env var
* export debian frontend var?
* move line and add comment
* bump pillow dependency
* bump lxml depenency
* install libjpeg-dev for pillow
* bump automat version to one compatible with py3.8
* add libwebp for pillow
* bump twisted trunk python version
* change suffix of newsfragment
* remove redundant python 3.7 checks
* lint
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Use sytest:bionic. Sytest:latest is two years old (do we want
CI to push out latest at all?) and comes with Python 3.5, which we
explictly no longer support. The script now runs under PostgreSQL 10
as a result.
- Advertise script in the docs
- Move pg testing script to scripts-dev directory
- Write to host as the script's exector, not root
A few changes to make it speedier to re-run the tests:
- Create blank DB in the container, not the script, so we don't have to
`initdb` each time
- Use a named volume to persist the tox environment, so we don't have to
fetch and install a bunch of packages from PyPI each time
Co-authored-by: reivilibre <olivier@librepush.net>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
using /usr/bin/env (#9689)
On NixOS, `bash` isn't under `/bin/bash` but rather in some directory in `$PATH`. Locally, I've been patching those scripts to make them work.
`/usr/bin/env` seems to be the only [portable way](https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/29608/why-is-it-better-to-use-usr-bin-env-name-instead-of-path-to-name-as-my) to use binaries from the PATH as interpreters.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Gliech <quentingliech@gmail.com>
|
| | |
|
| |
|
