diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'tests')
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/test_event_auth.py | 138 |
1 files changed, 90 insertions, 48 deletions
diff --git a/tests/test_event_auth.py b/tests/test_event_auth.py index cf407c51cf..e2c506e5a4 100644 --- a/tests/test_event_auth.py +++ b/tests/test_event_auth.py @@ -24,6 +24,47 @@ from synapse.types import JsonDict, get_domain_from_id class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): + def test_rejected_auth_events(self): + """ + Events that refer to rejected events in their auth events are rejected + """ + creator = "@creator:example.com" + auth_events = [ + _create_event(creator), + _join_event(creator), + ] + + # creator should be able to send state + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( + RoomVersions.V9, + _random_state_event(creator), + auth_events, + ) + + # ... but a rejected join_rules event should cause it to be rejected + rejected_join_rules = _join_rules_event(creator, "public") + rejected_join_rules.rejected_reason = "stinky" + auth_events.append(rejected_join_rules) + + self.assertRaises( + AuthError, + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event, + RoomVersions.V9, + _random_state_event(creator), + auth_events, + ) + + # ... even if there is *also* a good join rules + auth_events.append(_join_rules_event(creator, "public")) + + self.assertRaises( + AuthError, + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event, + RoomVersions.V9, + _random_state_event(creator), + auth_events, + ) + def test_random_users_cannot_send_state_before_first_pl(self): """ Check that, before the first PL lands, the creator is the only user @@ -31,11 +72,11 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): """ creator = "@creator:example.com" joiner = "@joiner:example.com" - auth_events = { - ("m.room.create", ""): _create_event(creator), - ("m.room.member", creator): _join_event(creator), - ("m.room.member", joiner): _join_event(joiner), - } + auth_events = [ + _create_event(creator), + _join_event(creator), + _join_event(joiner), + ] # creator should be able to send state event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( @@ -62,15 +103,15 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): pleb = "@joiner:example.com" king = "@joiner2:example.com" - auth_events = { - ("m.room.create", ""): _create_event(creator), - ("m.room.member", creator): _join_event(creator), - ("m.room.power_levels", ""): _power_levels_event( + auth_events = [ + _create_event(creator), + _join_event(creator), + _power_levels_event( creator, {"state_default": "30", "users": {pleb: "29", king: "30"}} ), - ("m.room.member", pleb): _join_event(pleb), - ("m.room.member", king): _join_event(king), - } + _join_event(pleb), + _join_event(king), + ] # pleb should not be able to send state self.assertRaises( @@ -92,10 +133,10 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): """Alias events have special behavior up through room version 6.""" creator = "@creator:example.com" other = "@other:example.com" - auth_events = { - ("m.room.create", ""): _create_event(creator), - ("m.room.member", creator): _join_event(creator), - } + auth_events = [ + _create_event(creator), + _join_event(creator), + ] # creator should be able to send aliases event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( @@ -131,10 +172,10 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): """After MSC2432, alias events have no special behavior.""" creator = "@creator:example.com" other = "@other:example.com" - auth_events = { - ("m.room.create", ""): _create_event(creator), - ("m.room.member", creator): _join_event(creator), - } + auth_events = [ + _create_event(creator), + _join_event(creator), + ] # creator should be able to send aliases event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( @@ -170,14 +211,14 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): creator = "@creator:example.com" pleb = "@joiner:example.com" - auth_events = { - ("m.room.create", ""): _create_event(creator), - ("m.room.member", creator): _join_event(creator), - ("m.room.power_levels", ""): _power_levels_event( + auth_events = [ + _create_event(creator), + _join_event(creator), + _power_levels_event( creator, {"state_default": "30", "users": {pleb: "30"}} ), - ("m.room.member", pleb): _join_event(pleb), - } + _join_event(pleb), + ] # pleb should be able to modify the notifications power level. event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( @@ -211,7 +252,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), - auth_events, + auth_events.values(), ) # A user cannot be force-joined to a room. @@ -219,7 +260,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _member_event(pleb, "join", sender=creator), - auth_events, + auth_events.values(), ) # Banned should be rejected. @@ -228,7 +269,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), - auth_events, + auth_events.values(), ) # A user who left can re-join. @@ -236,7 +277,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), - auth_events, + auth_events.values(), ) # A user can send a join if they're in the room. @@ -244,7 +285,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), - auth_events, + auth_events.values(), ) # A user can accept an invite. @@ -254,7 +295,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), - auth_events, + auth_events.values(), ) def test_join_rules_invite(self): @@ -275,7 +316,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), - auth_events, + auth_events.values(), ) # A user cannot be force-joined to a room. @@ -283,7 +324,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _member_event(pleb, "join", sender=creator), - auth_events, + auth_events.values(), ) # Banned should be rejected. @@ -292,7 +333,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), - auth_events, + auth_events.values(), ) # A user who left cannot re-join. @@ -301,7 +342,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), - auth_events, + auth_events.values(), ) # A user can send a join if they're in the room. @@ -309,7 +350,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), - auth_events, + auth_events.values(), ) # A user can accept an invite. @@ -319,7 +360,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), - auth_events, + auth_events.values(), ) def test_join_rules_msc3083_restricted(self): @@ -347,7 +388,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), - auth_events, + auth_events.values(), ) # A properly formatted join event should work. @@ -360,7 +401,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V8, authorised_join_event, - auth_events, + auth_events.values(), ) # A join issued by a specific user works (i.e. the power level checks @@ -380,7 +421,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): EventContentFields.AUTHORISING_USER: "@inviter:foo.test" }, ), - pl_auth_events, + pl_auth_events.values(), ) # A join which is missing an authorised server is rejected. @@ -388,7 +429,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V8, _join_event(pleb), - auth_events, + auth_events.values(), ) # An join authorised by a user who is not in the room is rejected. @@ -405,7 +446,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): EventContentFields.AUTHORISING_USER: "@other:example.com" }, ), - auth_events, + auth_events.values(), ) # A user cannot be force-joined to a room. (This uses an event which @@ -421,7 +462,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): EventContentFields.AUTHORISING_USER: "@inviter:foo.test" }, ), - auth_events, + auth_events.values(), ) # Banned should be rejected. @@ -430,7 +471,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V8, authorised_join_event, - auth_events, + auth_events.values(), ) # A user who left can re-join. @@ -438,7 +479,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V8, authorised_join_event, - auth_events, + auth_events.values(), ) # A user can send a join if they're in the room. (This doesn't need to @@ -447,7 +488,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V8, _join_event(pleb), - auth_events, + auth_events.values(), ) # A user can accept an invite. (This doesn't need to be authorised since @@ -458,7 +499,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V8, _join_event(pleb), - auth_events, + auth_events.values(), ) @@ -473,6 +514,7 @@ def _create_event(user_id: str) -> EventBase: "room_id": TEST_ROOM_ID, "event_id": _get_event_id(), "type": "m.room.create", + "state_key": "", "sender": user_id, "content": {"creator": user_id}, } |