diff options
Diffstat (limited to '')
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/test_event_auth.py | 108 |
1 files changed, 36 insertions, 72 deletions
diff --git a/tests/test_event_auth.py b/tests/test_event_auth.py index 6ebd01bcbe..e7a7d00883 100644 --- a/tests/test_event_auth.py +++ b/tests/test_event_auth.py @@ -37,21 +37,19 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): } # creator should be able to send state - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V1, _random_state_event(creator), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # joiner should not be able to send state self.assertRaises( AuthError, - event_auth.check, + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event, RoomVersions.V1, _random_state_event(joiner), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) def test_state_default_level(self): @@ -76,19 +74,17 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): # pleb should not be able to send state self.assertRaises( AuthError, - event_auth.check, + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event, RoomVersions.V1, _random_state_event(pleb), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ), # king should be able to send state - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V1, _random_state_event(king), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) def test_alias_event(self): @@ -101,37 +97,33 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): } # creator should be able to send aliases - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V1, _alias_event(creator), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # Reject an event with no state key. with self.assertRaises(AuthError): - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V1, _alias_event(creator, state_key=""), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # If the domain of the sender does not match the state key, reject. with self.assertRaises(AuthError): - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V1, _alias_event(creator, state_key="test.com"), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # Note that the member does *not* need to be in the room. - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V1, _alias_event(other), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) def test_msc2432_alias_event(self): @@ -144,34 +136,30 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): } # creator should be able to send aliases - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _alias_event(creator), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # No particular checks are done on the state key. - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _alias_event(creator, state_key=""), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _alias_event(creator, state_key="test.com"), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # Per standard auth rules, the member must be in the room. with self.assertRaises(AuthError): - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _alias_event(other), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) def test_msc2209(self): @@ -191,20 +179,18 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): } # pleb should be able to modify the notifications power level. - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V1, _power_levels_event(pleb, {"notifications": {"room": 100}}), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # But an MSC2209 room rejects this change. with self.assertRaises(AuthError): - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _power_levels_event(pleb, {"notifications": {"room": 100}}), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) def test_join_rules_public(self): @@ -221,59 +207,53 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): } # Check join. - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # A user cannot be force-joined to a room. with self.assertRaises(AuthError): - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _member_event(pleb, "join", sender=creator), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # Banned should be rejected. auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "ban") with self.assertRaises(AuthError): - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # A user who left can re-join. auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "leave") - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # A user can send a join if they're in the room. auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "join") - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # A user can accept an invite. auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event( pleb, "invite", sender=creator ) - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) def test_join_rules_invite(self): @@ -291,60 +271,54 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): # A join without an invite is rejected. with self.assertRaises(AuthError): - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # A user cannot be force-joined to a room. with self.assertRaises(AuthError): - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _member_event(pleb, "join", sender=creator), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # Banned should be rejected. auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "ban") with self.assertRaises(AuthError): - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # A user who left cannot re-join. auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "leave") with self.assertRaises(AuthError): - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # A user can send a join if they're in the room. auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "join") - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # A user can accept an invite. auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event( pleb, "invite", sender=creator ) - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) def test_join_rules_msc3083_restricted(self): @@ -369,11 +343,10 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): # Older room versions don't understand this join rule with self.assertRaises(AuthError): - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # A properly formatted join event should work. @@ -383,11 +356,10 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): "join_authorised_via_users_server": "@creator:example.com" }, ) - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V8, authorised_join_event, auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # A join issued by a specific user works (i.e. the power level checks @@ -399,7 +371,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): pl_auth_events[("m.room.member", "@inviter:foo.test")] = _join_event( "@inviter:foo.test" ) - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V8, _join_event( pleb, @@ -408,16 +380,14 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): }, ), pl_auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # A join which is missing an authorised server is rejected. with self.assertRaises(AuthError): - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V8, _join_event(pleb), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # An join authorised by a user who is not in the room is rejected. @@ -426,7 +396,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): creator, {"invite": 100, "users": {"@other:example.com": 150}} ) with self.assertRaises(AuthError): - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V8, _join_event( pleb, @@ -435,13 +405,12 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): }, ), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # A user cannot be force-joined to a room. (This uses an event which # *would* be valid, but is sent be a different user.) with self.assertRaises(AuthError): - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V8, _member_event( pleb, @@ -452,36 +421,32 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): }, ), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # Banned should be rejected. auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "ban") with self.assertRaises(AuthError): - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V8, authorised_join_event, auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # A user who left can re-join. auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "leave") - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V8, authorised_join_event, auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # A user can send a join if they're in the room. (This doesn't need to # be authorised since the user is already joined.) auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "join") - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V8, _join_event(pleb), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # A user can accept an invite. (This doesn't need to be authorised since @@ -489,11 +454,10 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event( pleb, "invite", sender=creator ) - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V8, _join_event(pleb), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) |