diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/storage')
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/storage/test_devices.py | 160 |
1 files changed, 159 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/tests/storage/test_devices.py b/tests/storage/test_devices.py index 6790aa5242..b547bf8d99 100644 --- a/tests/storage/test_devices.py +++ b/tests/storage/test_devices.py @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ class DeviceStoreTestCase(HomeserverTestCase): def test_get_device_updates_by_remote(self): device_ids = ["device_id1", "device_id2"] - # Add two device updates with a single stream_id + # Add two device updates with sequential `stream_id`s self.get_success( self.store.add_device_change_to_streams("user_id", device_ids, ["somehost"]) ) @@ -107,6 +107,164 @@ class DeviceStoreTestCase(HomeserverTestCase): # Check original device_ids are contained within these updates self._check_devices_in_updates(device_ids, device_updates) + def test_get_device_updates_by_remote_can_limit_properly(self): + """ + Tests that `get_device_updates_by_remote` returns an appropriate + stream_id to resume fetching from (without skipping any results). + """ + + # Add some device updates with sequential `stream_id`s + device_ids = [ + "device_id1", + "device_id2", + "device_id3", + "device_id4", + "device_id5", + ] + self.get_success( + self.store.add_device_change_to_streams("user_id", device_ids, ["somehost"]) + ) + + # Get device updates meant for this remote + next_stream_id, device_updates = self.get_success( + self.store.get_device_updates_by_remote("somehost", -1, limit=3) + ) + + # Check the first three original device_ids are contained within these updates + self._check_devices_in_updates(device_ids[:3], device_updates) + + # Get the next batch of device updates + next_stream_id, device_updates = self.get_success( + self.store.get_device_updates_by_remote("somehost", next_stream_id, limit=3) + ) + + # Check the last two original device_ids are contained within these updates + self._check_devices_in_updates(device_ids[3:], device_updates) + + # Add some more device updates to ensure it still resumes properly + device_ids = ["device_id6", "device_id7"] + self.get_success( + self.store.add_device_change_to_streams("user_id", device_ids, ["somehost"]) + ) + + # Get the next batch of device updates + next_stream_id, device_updates = self.get_success( + self.store.get_device_updates_by_remote("somehost", next_stream_id, limit=3) + ) + + # Check the newly-added device_ids are contained within these updates + self._check_devices_in_updates(device_ids, device_updates) + + # Check there are no more device updates left. + _, device_updates = self.get_success( + self.store.get_device_updates_by_remote("somehost", next_stream_id, limit=3) + ) + self.assertEqual(device_updates, []) + + def test_get_device_updates_by_remote_cross_signing_key_updates( + self, + ) -> None: + """ + Tests that `get_device_updates_by_remote` limits the length of the return value + properly when cross-signing key updates are present. + Current behaviour is that the cross-signing key updates will always come in pairs, + even if that means leaving an earlier batch one EDU short of the limit. + """ + + assert self.hs.is_mine_id( + "@user_id:test" + ), "Test not valid: this MXID should be considered local" + + self.get_success( + self.store.set_e2e_cross_signing_key( + "@user_id:test", + "master", + { + "keys": { + "ed25519:fakeMaster": "aaafakefakefake1AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA=" + }, + "signatures": { + "@user_id:test": { + "ed25519:fake2": "aaafakefakefake2AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA=" + } + }, + }, + ) + ) + self.get_success( + self.store.set_e2e_cross_signing_key( + "@user_id:test", + "self_signing", + { + "keys": { + "ed25519:fakeSelfSigning": "aaafakefakefake3AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA=" + }, + "signatures": { + "@user_id:test": { + "ed25519:fake4": "aaafakefakefake4AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA=" + } + }, + }, + ) + ) + + # Add some device updates with sequential `stream_id`s + # Note that the public cross-signing keys occupy the same space as device IDs, + # so also notify that those have updated. + device_ids = [ + "device_id1", + "device_id2", + "fakeMaster", + "fakeSelfSigning", + ] + + self.get_success( + self.store.add_device_change_to_streams( + "@user_id:test", device_ids, ["somehost"] + ) + ) + + # Get device updates meant for this remote + next_stream_id, device_updates = self.get_success( + self.store.get_device_updates_by_remote("somehost", -1, limit=3) + ) + + # Here we expect the device updates for `device_id1` and `device_id2`. + # That means we only receive 2 updates this time around. + # If we had a higher limit, we would expect to see the pair of + # (unstable-prefixed & unprefixed) signing key updates for the device + # represented by `fakeMaster` and `fakeSelfSigning`. + # Our implementation only sends these two variants together, so we get + # a short batch. + self.assertEqual(len(device_updates), 2, device_updates) + + # Check the first two devices (device_id1, device_id2) came out. + self._check_devices_in_updates(device_ids[:2], device_updates) + + # Get more device updates meant for this remote + next_stream_id, device_updates = self.get_success( + self.store.get_device_updates_by_remote("somehost", next_stream_id, limit=3) + ) + + # The next 2 updates should be a cross-signing key update + # (the master key update and the self-signing key update are combined into + # one 'signing key update', but the cross-signing key update is emitted + # twice, once with an unprefixed type and once again with an unstable-prefixed type) + # (This is a temporary arrangement for backwards compatibility!) + self.assertEqual(len(device_updates), 2, device_updates) + self.assertEqual( + device_updates[0][0], "m.signing_key_update", device_updates[0] + ) + self.assertEqual( + device_updates[1][0], "org.matrix.signing_key_update", device_updates[1] + ) + + # Check there are no more device updates left. + _, device_updates = self.get_success( + self.store.get_device_updates_by_remote("somehost", next_stream_id, limit=3) + ) + self.assertEqual(device_updates, []) + def _check_devices_in_updates(self, expected_device_ids, device_updates): """Check that an specific device ids exist in a list of device update EDUs""" self.assertEqual(len(device_updates), len(expected_device_ids)) |