diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/push')
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/push/test_bulk_push_rule_evaluator.py | 93 |
1 files changed, 80 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/tests/push/test_bulk_push_rule_evaluator.py b/tests/push/test_bulk_push_rule_evaluator.py index aba62b5dc8..fda48d9f61 100644 --- a/tests/push/test_bulk_push_rule_evaluator.py +++ b/tests/push/test_bulk_push_rule_evaluator.py @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ from typing import Any from unittest.mock import patch +from parameterized import parameterized + from twisted.test.proto_helpers import MemoryReactor from synapse.api.constants import EventContentFields @@ -48,35 +50,84 @@ class TestBulkPushRuleEvaluator(HomeserverTestCase): self.requester = create_requester(self.alice) self.room_id = self.helper.create_room_as( - self.alice, room_version=RoomVersions.V9.identifier, tok=self.token + # This is deliberately set to V9, because we want to test the logic which + # handles stringy power levels. Stringy power levels were outlawed in V10. + self.alice, + room_version=RoomVersions.V9.identifier, + tok=self.token, ) self.event_creation_handler = self.hs.get_event_creation_handler() - def test_action_for_event_by_user_handles_noninteger_power_levels(self) -> None: - """We should convert floats and strings to integers before passing to Rust. + @parameterized.expand( + [ + # The historically-permitted bad values. Alice's notification should be + # allowed if this threshold is at or below her power level (60) + ("100", False), + ("0", True), + (12.34, True), + (60.0, True), + (67.89, False), + # Values that int(...) would not successfully cast should be ignored. + # The room notification level should then default to 50, per the spec, so + # Alice's notification is allowed. + (None, True), + # We haven't seen `"room": []` or `"room": {}` in the wild (yet), but + # let's check them for paranoia's sake. + ([], True), + ({}, True), + ] + ) + def test_action_for_event_by_user_handles_noninteger_room_power_levels( + self, bad_room_level: object, should_permit: bool + ) -> None: + """We should convert strings in `room` to integers before passing to Rust. + + Test this as follows: + - Create a room as Alice and invite two other users Bob and Charlie. + - Set PLs so that Alice has PL 60 and `notifications.room` is set to a bad value. + - Have Alice create a message notifying @room. + - Evaluate notification actions for that message. This should not raise. + - Look in the DB to see if that message triggered a highlight for Bob. + + The test is parameterised with two arguments: + - the bad power level value for "room", before JSON serisalistion + - whether Bob should expect the message to be highlighted Reproduces #14060. A lack of validation: the gift that keeps on giving. """ - - # Alter the power levels in that room to include stringy and floaty levels. - # We need to suppress the validation logic or else it will reject these dodgy - # values. (Presumably this validation was not always present.) + # Join another user to the room, so that there is someone to see Alice's + # @room notification. + bob = self.register_user("bob", "pass") + bob_token = self.login(bob, "pass") + self.helper.join(self.room_id, bob, tok=bob_token) + + # Alter the power levels in that room to include the bad @room notification + # level. We need to suppress + # + # - canonicaljson validation, because canonicaljson forbids floats; + # - the event jsonschema validation, because it will forbid bad values; and + # - the auth rules checks, because they stop us from creating power levels + # with `"room": null`. (We want to test this case, because we have seen it + # in the wild.) + # + # We have seen stringy and null values for "room" in the wild, so presumably + # some of this validation was missing in the past. with patch("synapse.events.validator.validate_canonicaljson"), patch( "synapse.events.validator.jsonschema.validate" - ): - self.helper.send_state( + ), patch("synapse.handlers.event_auth.check_state_dependent_auth_rules"): + pl_event_id = self.helper.send_state( self.room_id, "m.room.power_levels", { - "users": {self.alice: "100"}, # stringy - "notifications": {"room": 100.0}, # float + "users": {self.alice: 60}, + "notifications": {"room": bad_room_level}, }, self.token, state_key="", - ) + )["event_id"] # Create a new message event, and try to evaluate it under the dodgy # power level event. @@ -88,10 +139,11 @@ class TestBulkPushRuleEvaluator(HomeserverTestCase): "room_id": self.room_id, "content": { "msgtype": "m.text", - "body": "helo", + "body": "helo @room", }, "sender": self.alice, }, + prev_event_ids=[pl_event_id], ) ) @@ -99,6 +151,21 @@ class TestBulkPushRuleEvaluator(HomeserverTestCase): # should not raise self.get_success(bulk_evaluator.action_for_events_by_user([(event, context)])) + # Did Bob see Alice's @room notification? + highlighted_actions = self.get_success( + self.hs.get_datastores().main.db_pool.simple_select_list( + table="event_push_actions_staging", + keyvalues={ + "event_id": event.event_id, + "user_id": bob, + "highlight": 1, + }, + retcols=("*",), + desc="get_event_push_actions_staging", + ) + ) + self.assertEqual(len(highlighted_actions), int(should_permit)) + @override_config({"push": {"enabled": False}}) def test_action_for_event_by_user_disabled_by_config(self) -> None: """Ensure that push rules are not calculated when disabled in the config""" |