summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/tests/push
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/push')
-rw-r--r--tests/push/test_http.py40
-rw-r--r--tests/push/test_push_rule_evaluator.py23
2 files changed, 35 insertions, 28 deletions
diff --git a/tests/push/test_http.py b/tests/push/test_http.py

index 6691e07128..ba158f5d93 100644 --- a/tests/push/test_http.py +++ b/tests/push/test_http.py
@@ -11,15 +11,19 @@ # WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. # See the License for the specific language governing permissions and # limitations under the License. -from typing import List, Tuple +from typing import Any, Dict, List, Optional, Tuple from unittest.mock import Mock from twisted.internet.defer import Deferred +from twisted.test.proto_helpers import MemoryReactor import synapse.rest.admin from synapse.logging.context import make_deferred_yieldable from synapse.push import PusherConfigException from synapse.rest.client import login, push_rule, receipts, room +from synapse.server import HomeServer +from synapse.types import JsonDict +from synapse.util import Clock from tests.unittest import HomeserverTestCase, override_config @@ -35,13 +39,13 @@ class HTTPPusherTests(HomeserverTestCase): user_id = True hijack_auth = False - def default_config(self): + def default_config(self) -> Dict[str, Any]: config = super().default_config() config["start_pushers"] = True return config - def make_homeserver(self, reactor, clock): - self.push_attempts: List[tuple[Deferred, str, dict]] = [] + def make_homeserver(self, reactor: MemoryReactor, clock: Clock) -> HomeServer: + self.push_attempts: List[Tuple[Deferred, str, dict]] = [] m = Mock() @@ -56,7 +60,7 @@ class HTTPPusherTests(HomeserverTestCase): return hs - def test_invalid_configuration(self): + def test_invalid_configuration(self) -> None: """Invalid push configurations should be rejected.""" # Register the user who gets notified user_id = self.register_user("user", "pass") @@ -68,7 +72,7 @@ class HTTPPusherTests(HomeserverTestCase): ) token_id = user_tuple.token_id - def test_data(data): + def test_data(data: Optional[JsonDict]) -> None: self.get_failure( self.hs.get_pusherpool().add_pusher( user_id=user_id, @@ -95,7 +99,7 @@ class HTTPPusherTests(HomeserverTestCase): # A url with an incorrect path isn't accepted. test_data({"url": "http://example.com/foo"}) - def test_sends_http(self): + def test_sends_http(self) -> None: """ The HTTP pusher will send pushes for each message to a HTTP endpoint when configured to do so. @@ -200,7 +204,7 @@ class HTTPPusherTests(HomeserverTestCase): self.assertEqual(len(pushers), 1) self.assertTrue(pushers[0].last_stream_ordering > last_stream_ordering) - def test_sends_high_priority_for_encrypted(self): + def test_sends_high_priority_for_encrypted(self) -> None: """ The HTTP pusher will send pushes at high priority if they correspond to an encrypted message. @@ -321,7 +325,7 @@ class HTTPPusherTests(HomeserverTestCase): ) self.assertEqual(self.push_attempts[1][2]["notification"]["prio"], "high") - def test_sends_high_priority_for_one_to_one_only(self): + def test_sends_high_priority_for_one_to_one_only(self) -> None: """ The HTTP pusher will send pushes at high priority if they correspond to a message in a one-to-one room. @@ -404,7 +408,7 @@ class HTTPPusherTests(HomeserverTestCase): # check that this is low-priority self.assertEqual(self.push_attempts[1][2]["notification"]["prio"], "low") - def test_sends_high_priority_for_mention(self): + def test_sends_high_priority_for_mention(self) -> None: """ The HTTP pusher will send pushes at high priority if they correspond to a message containing the user's display name. @@ -480,7 +484,7 @@ class HTTPPusherTests(HomeserverTestCase): # check that this is low-priority self.assertEqual(self.push_attempts[1][2]["notification"]["prio"], "low") - def test_sends_high_priority_for_atroom(self): + def test_sends_high_priority_for_atroom(self) -> None: """ The HTTP pusher will send pushes at high priority if they correspond to a message that contains @room. @@ -563,7 +567,7 @@ class HTTPPusherTests(HomeserverTestCase): # check that this is low-priority self.assertEqual(self.push_attempts[1][2]["notification"]["prio"], "low") - def test_push_unread_count_group_by_room(self): + def test_push_unread_count_group_by_room(self) -> None: """ The HTTP pusher will group unread count by number of unread rooms. """ @@ -576,7 +580,7 @@ class HTTPPusherTests(HomeserverTestCase): self._check_push_attempt(6, 1) @override_config({"push": {"group_unread_count_by_room": False}}) - def test_push_unread_count_message_count(self): + def test_push_unread_count_message_count(self) -> None: """ The HTTP pusher will send the total unread message count. """ @@ -589,7 +593,7 @@ class HTTPPusherTests(HomeserverTestCase): # last read receipt self._check_push_attempt(6, 3) - def _test_push_unread_count(self): + def _test_push_unread_count(self) -> None: """ Tests that the correct unread count appears in sent push notifications @@ -681,7 +685,7 @@ class HTTPPusherTests(HomeserverTestCase): self.helper.send(room_id, body="HELLO???", tok=other_access_token) - def _advance_time_and_make_push_succeed(self, expected_push_attempts): + def _advance_time_and_make_push_succeed(self, expected_push_attempts: int) -> None: self.pump() self.push_attempts[expected_push_attempts - 1][0].callback({}) @@ -708,7 +712,9 @@ class HTTPPusherTests(HomeserverTestCase): expected_unread_count_last_push, ) - def _send_read_request(self, access_token, message_event_id, room_id): + def _send_read_request( + self, access_token: str, message_event_id: str, room_id: str + ) -> None: # Now set the user's read receipt position to the first event # # This will actually trigger a new notification to be sent out so that @@ -748,7 +754,7 @@ class HTTPPusherTests(HomeserverTestCase): return user_id, access_token - def test_dont_notify_rule_overrides_message(self): + def test_dont_notify_rule_overrides_message(self) -> None: """ The override push rule will suppress notification """ diff --git a/tests/push/test_push_rule_evaluator.py b/tests/push/test_push_rule_evaluator.py
index 3849beb9d6..5dba187076 100644 --- a/tests/push/test_push_rule_evaluator.py +++ b/tests/push/test_push_rule_evaluator.py
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ # See the License for the specific language governing permissions and # limitations under the License. -from typing import Any, Dict +from typing import Dict, Optional, Union import frozendict @@ -20,12 +20,13 @@ from synapse.api.room_versions import RoomVersions from synapse.events import FrozenEvent from synapse.push import push_rule_evaluator from synapse.push.push_rule_evaluator import PushRuleEvaluatorForEvent +from synapse.types import JsonDict from tests import unittest class PushRuleEvaluatorTestCase(unittest.TestCase): - def _get_evaluator(self, content): + def _get_evaluator(self, content: JsonDict) -> PushRuleEvaluatorForEvent: event = FrozenEvent( { "event_id": "$event_id", @@ -39,12 +40,12 @@ class PushRuleEvaluatorTestCase(unittest.TestCase): ) room_member_count = 0 sender_power_level = 0 - power_levels = {} + power_levels: Dict[str, Union[int, Dict[str, int]]] = {} return PushRuleEvaluatorForEvent( event, room_member_count, sender_power_level, power_levels ) - def test_display_name(self): + def test_display_name(self) -> None: """Check for a matching display name in the body of the event.""" evaluator = self._get_evaluator({"body": "foo bar baz"}) @@ -71,20 +72,20 @@ class PushRuleEvaluatorTestCase(unittest.TestCase): self.assertTrue(evaluator.matches(condition, "@user:test", "foo bar")) def _assert_matches( - self, condition: Dict[str, Any], content: Dict[str, Any], msg=None + self, condition: JsonDict, content: JsonDict, msg: Optional[str] = None ) -> None: evaluator = self._get_evaluator(content) self.assertTrue(evaluator.matches(condition, "@user:test", "display_name"), msg) def _assert_not_matches( - self, condition: Dict[str, Any], content: Dict[str, Any], msg=None + self, condition: JsonDict, content: JsonDict, msg: Optional[str] = None ) -> None: evaluator = self._get_evaluator(content) self.assertFalse( evaluator.matches(condition, "@user:test", "display_name"), msg ) - def test_event_match_body(self): + def test_event_match_body(self) -> None: """Check that event_match conditions on content.body work as expected""" # if the key is `content.body`, the pattern matches substrings. @@ -165,7 +166,7 @@ class PushRuleEvaluatorTestCase(unittest.TestCase): r"? after \ should match any character", ) - def test_event_match_non_body(self): + def test_event_match_non_body(self) -> None: """Check that event_match conditions on other keys work as expected""" # if the key is anything other than 'content.body', the pattern must match the @@ -241,7 +242,7 @@ class PushRuleEvaluatorTestCase(unittest.TestCase): "pattern should not match before a newline", ) - def test_no_body(self): + def test_no_body(self) -> None: """Not having a body shouldn't break the evaluator.""" evaluator = self._get_evaluator({}) @@ -250,7 +251,7 @@ class PushRuleEvaluatorTestCase(unittest.TestCase): } self.assertFalse(evaluator.matches(condition, "@user:test", "foo")) - def test_invalid_body(self): + def test_invalid_body(self) -> None: """A non-string body should not break the evaluator.""" condition = { "kind": "contains_display_name", @@ -260,7 +261,7 @@ class PushRuleEvaluatorTestCase(unittest.TestCase): evaluator = self._get_evaluator({"body": body}) self.assertFalse(evaluator.matches(condition, "@user:test", "foo")) - def test_tweaks_for_actions(self): + def test_tweaks_for_actions(self) -> None: """ This tests the behaviour of tweaks_for_actions. """