diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/handlers')
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/handlers/test_user_directory.py | 71 |
1 files changed, 69 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/tests/handlers/test_user_directory.py b/tests/handlers/test_user_directory.py index 47217f0542..db65253773 100644 --- a/tests/handlers/test_user_directory.py +++ b/tests/handlers/test_user_directory.py @@ -372,8 +372,6 @@ class UserDirectoryTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase): # Alice makes two rooms. Bob joins one of them. room1 = self.helper.create_room_as(alice, tok=alice_token) room2 = self.helper.create_room_as(alice, tok=alice_token) - print("room1=", room1) - print("room2=", room2) self.helper.join(room1, bob, tok=bob_token) # The user sharing tables should have been updated. @@ -436,6 +434,75 @@ class UserDirectoryTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase): 0, ) + def test_making_room_public_doesnt_alter_directory_entry(self) -> None: + """Per-room names shouldn't go to the directory when the room becomes public. + + This isn't about preventing a leak (the room is now public, so the nickname + is too). It's about preserving the invariant that we only show a user's public + profile in the user directory results. + + I made this a Synapse test case rather than a Complement one because + I think this is (strictly speaking) an implementation choice. Synapse + has chosen to only ever use the public profile when responding to a user + directory search. There's no privacy leak here, because making the room + public discloses the per-room name. + + The spec doesn't mandate anything about _how_ a user + should appear in a /user_directory/search result. Hypothetical example: + suppose Bob searches for Alice. When representing Alice in a search + result, it's reasonable to use any of Alice's nicknames that Bob is + aware of. Heck, maybe we even want to use lots of them in a combined + displayname like `Alice (aka "ali", "ally", "41iC3")`. + """ + + # TODO the same should apply when Alice is a remote user. + alice = self.register_user("alice", "pass") + alice_token = self.login(alice, "pass") + bob = self.register_user("bob", "pass") + bob_token = self.login(bob, "pass") + + # Alice and Bob are in a private room. + room = self.helper.create_room_as(alice, is_public=False, tok=alice_token) + self.helper.invite(room, src=alice, targ=bob, tok=alice_token) + self.helper.join(room, user=bob, tok=bob_token) + + # Alice has a nickname unique to that room. + + self.helper.send_state( + room, + "m.room.member", + { + "displayname": "Freddy Mercury", + "membership": "join", + }, + alice_token, + state_key=alice, + ) + + # Check Alice isn't recorded as being in a public room. + public = self.get_success(self.user_dir_helper.get_users_in_public_rooms()) + self.assertNotIn((alice, room), public) + + # One of them makes the room public. + self.helper.send_state( + room, + "m.room.join_rules", + {"join_rule": "public"}, + alice_token, + ) + + # Check that Alice is now recorded as being in a public room + public = self.get_success(self.user_dir_helper.get_users_in_public_rooms()) + self.assertIn((alice, room), public) + + # Alice's display name remains the same in the user directory. + search_result = self.get_success(self.handler.search_users(bob, alice, 10)) + self.assertEqual( + search_result["results"], + [{"display_name": "alice", "avatar_url": None, "user_id": alice}], + 0, + ) + def test_private_room(self) -> None: """ A user can be searched for only by people that are either in a public |