diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'synapse/storage')
| -rw-r--r-- | synapse/storage/data_stores/main/monthly_active_users.py | 100 |
1 files changed, 41 insertions, 59 deletions
diff --git a/synapse/storage/data_stores/main/monthly_active_users.py b/synapse/storage/data_stores/main/monthly_active_users.py index a42c52f323..1310d39069 100644 --- a/synapse/storage/data_stores/main/monthly_active_users.py +++ b/synapse/storage/data_stores/main/monthly_active_users.py @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ import logging from twisted.internet import defer from synapse.storage._base import SQLBaseStore -from synapse.storage.database import Database +from synapse.storage.database import Database, make_in_list_sql_clause from synapse.util.caches.descriptors import cached logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) @@ -187,75 +187,57 @@ class MonthlyActiveUsersStore(MonthlyActiveUsersWorkerStore): """ thirty_days_ago = int(self._clock.time_msec()) - (1000 * 60 * 60 * 24 * 30) - query_args = [thirty_days_ago] - base_sql = "DELETE FROM monthly_active_users WHERE timestamp < ?" - - # Need if/else since 'AND user_id NOT IN ({})' fails on Postgres - # when len(reserved_users) == 0. Works fine on sqlite. - if len(reserved_users) > 0: - # questionmarks is a hack to overcome sqlite not supporting - # tuples in 'WHERE IN %s' - question_marks = ",".join("?" * len(reserved_users)) - - query_args.extend(reserved_users) - sql = base_sql + " AND user_id NOT IN ({})".format(question_marks) - else: - sql = base_sql - txn.execute(sql, query_args) + in_clause, in_clause_args = make_in_list_sql_clause( + self.database_engine, "user_id", reserved_users + ) + + txn.execute( + "DELETE FROM monthly_active_users WHERE timestamp < ? AND NOT %s" + % (in_clause,), + [thirty_days_ago] + in_clause_args, + ) if self._limit_usage_by_mau: # If MAU user count still exceeds the MAU threshold, then delete on # a least recently active basis. # Note it is not possible to write this query using OFFSET due to # incompatibilities in how sqlite and postgres support the feature. - # sqlite requires 'LIMIT -1 OFFSET ?', the LIMIT must be present - # While Postgres does not require 'LIMIT', but also does not support + # Sqlite requires 'LIMIT -1 OFFSET ?', the LIMIT must be present, + # while Postgres does not require 'LIMIT', but also does not support # negative LIMIT values. So there is no way to write it that both can # support - if len(reserved_users) == 0: - sql = """ - DELETE FROM monthly_active_users - WHERE user_id NOT IN ( - SELECT user_id FROM monthly_active_users - ORDER BY timestamp DESC - LIMIT ? - ) - """ - txn.execute(sql, ((self._max_mau_value),)) - # Need if/else since 'AND user_id NOT IN ({})' fails on Postgres - # when len(reserved_users) == 0. Works fine on sqlite. - else: - # Must be >= 0 for postgres - num_of_non_reserved_users_to_remove = max( - self._max_mau_value - len(reserved_users), 0 - ) - # It is important to filter reserved users twice to guard - # against the case where the reserved user is present in the - # SELECT, meaning that a legitmate mau is deleted. - sql = """ - DELETE FROM monthly_active_users - WHERE user_id NOT IN ( - SELECT user_id FROM monthly_active_users - WHERE user_id NOT IN ({}) - ORDER BY timestamp DESC - LIMIT ? - ) - AND user_id NOT IN ({}) - """.format( - question_marks, question_marks + # Limit must be >= 0 for postgres + num_of_non_reserved_users_to_remove = max( + self._max_mau_value - len(reserved_users), 0 + ) + + # It is important to filter reserved users twice to guard + # against the case where the reserved user is present in the + # SELECT, meaning that a legitimate mau is deleted. + sql = """ + DELETE FROM monthly_active_users + WHERE user_id NOT IN ( + SELECT user_id FROM monthly_active_users + WHERE NOT %s + ORDER BY timestamp DESC + LIMIT ? ) - - query_args = [ - *reserved_users, - num_of_non_reserved_users_to_remove, - *reserved_users, - ] - - txn.execute(sql, query_args) - - # It seems poor to invalidate the whole cache, Postgres supports + AND NOT %s + """ % ( + in_clause, + in_clause, + ) + + query_args = ( + in_clause_args + + [num_of_non_reserved_users_to_remove] + + in_clause_args + ) + txn.execute(sql, query_args) + + # It seems poor to invalidate the whole cache. Postgres supports # 'Returning' which would allow me to invalidate only the # specific users, but sqlite has no way to do this and instead # I would need to SELECT and the DELETE which without locking |