summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/rust/src/push/evaluator.rs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--rust/src/push/evaluator.rs277
1 files changed, 197 insertions, 80 deletions
diff --git a/rust/src/push/evaluator.rs b/rust/src/push/evaluator.rs

index efe88ec76e..c901c0fbcc 100644 --- a/rust/src/push/evaluator.rs +++ b/rust/src/push/evaluator.rs
@@ -12,10 +12,7 @@ // See the License for the specific language governing permissions and // limitations under the License. -use std::{ - borrow::Cow, - collections::{BTreeMap, BTreeSet}, -}; +use std::collections::BTreeMap; use anyhow::{Context, Error}; use lazy_static::lazy_static; @@ -26,11 +23,39 @@ use regex::Regex; use super::{ utils::{get_glob_matcher, get_localpart_from_id, GlobMatchType}, Action, Condition, EventMatchCondition, FilteredPushRules, KnownCondition, + RelatedEventMatchCondition, }; lazy_static! { /// Used to parse the `is` clause in the room member count condition. static ref INEQUALITY_EXPR: Regex = Regex::new(r"^([=<>]*)([0-9]+)$").expect("valid regex"); + + /// Used to determine which MSC3931 room version feature flags are actually known to + /// the push evaluator. + static ref KNOWN_RVER_FLAGS: Vec<String> = vec![ + RoomVersionFeatures::ExtensibleEvents.as_str().to_string(), + ]; + + /// The "safe" rule IDs which are not affected by MSC3932's behaviour (room versions which + /// declare Extensible Events support ultimately *disable* push rules which do not declare + /// *any* MSC3931 room_version_supports condition). + static ref SAFE_EXTENSIBLE_EVENTS_RULE_IDS: Vec<String> = vec![ + "global/override/.m.rule.master".to_string(), + "global/override/.m.rule.roomnotif".to_string(), + "global/content/.m.rule.contains_user_name".to_string(), + ]; +} + +enum RoomVersionFeatures { + ExtensibleEvents, +} + +impl RoomVersionFeatures { + fn as_str(&self) -> &'static str { + match self { + RoomVersionFeatures::ExtensibleEvents => "org.matrix.msc3932.extensible_events", + } + } } /// Allows running a set of push rules against a particular event. @@ -49,29 +74,39 @@ pub struct PushRuleEvaluator { /// The `notifications` section of the current power levels in the room. notification_power_levels: BTreeMap<String, i64>, - /// The relations related to the event as a mapping from relation type to - /// set of sender/event type 2-tuples. - relations: BTreeMap<String, BTreeSet<(String, String)>>, - - /// Is running "relation" conditions enabled? - relation_match_enabled: bool, - /// The power level of the sender of the event, or None if event is an /// outlier. sender_power_level: Option<i64>, + + /// The related events, indexed by relation type. Flattened in the same manner as + /// `flattened_keys`. + related_events_flattened: BTreeMap<String, BTreeMap<String, String>>, + + /// If msc3664, push rules for related events, is enabled. + related_event_match_enabled: bool, + + /// If MSC3931 is applicable, the feature flags for the room version. + room_version_feature_flags: Vec<String>, + + /// If MSC3931 (room version feature flags) is enabled. Usually controlled by the same + /// flag as MSC1767 (extensible events core). + msc3931_enabled: bool, } #[pymethods] impl PushRuleEvaluator { /// Create a new `PushRuleEvaluator`. See struct docstring for details. + #[allow(clippy::too_many_arguments)] #[new] pub fn py_new( flattened_keys: BTreeMap<String, String>, room_member_count: u64, sender_power_level: Option<i64>, notification_power_levels: BTreeMap<String, i64>, - relations: BTreeMap<String, BTreeSet<(String, String)>>, - relation_match_enabled: bool, + related_events_flattened: BTreeMap<String, BTreeMap<String, String>>, + related_event_match_enabled: bool, + room_version_feature_flags: Vec<String>, + msc3931_enabled: bool, ) -> Result<Self, Error> { let body = flattened_keys .get("content.body") @@ -83,9 +118,11 @@ impl PushRuleEvaluator { body, room_member_count, notification_power_levels, - relations, - relation_match_enabled, sender_power_level, + related_events_flattened, + related_event_match_enabled, + room_version_feature_flags, + msc3931_enabled, }) } @@ -108,7 +145,19 @@ impl PushRuleEvaluator { continue; } + let rule_id = &push_rule.rule_id().to_string(); + let extev_flag = &RoomVersionFeatures::ExtensibleEvents.as_str().to_string(); + let supports_extensible_events = self.room_version_feature_flags.contains(extev_flag); + let safe_from_rver_condition = SAFE_EXTENSIBLE_EVENTS_RULE_IDS.contains(rule_id); + let mut has_rver_condition = false; + for condition in push_rule.conditions.iter() { + has_rver_condition |= matches!( + condition, + // per MSC3932, we just need *any* room version condition to match + Condition::Known(KnownCondition::RoomVersionSupports { feature: _ }), + ); + match self.match_condition(condition, user_id, display_name) { Ok(true) => {} Ok(false) => continue 'outer, @@ -119,6 +168,13 @@ impl PushRuleEvaluator { } } + // MSC3932: Disable push rules in extensible event-supporting room versions if they + // don't describe *any* MSC3931 room version condition, unless the rule is on the + // safe list. + if !has_rver_condition && !safe_from_rver_condition && supports_extensible_events { + continue; + } + let actions = push_rule .actions .iter() @@ -170,6 +226,9 @@ impl PushRuleEvaluator { KnownCondition::EventMatch(event_match) => { self.match_event_match(event_match, user_id)? } + KnownCondition::RelatedEventMatch(event_match) => { + self.match_related_event_match(event_match, user_id)? + } KnownCondition::ContainsDisplayName => { if let Some(dn) = display_name { if !dn.is_empty() { @@ -203,95 +262,99 @@ impl PushRuleEvaluator { false } } - KnownCondition::RelationMatch { - rel_type, - event_type_pattern, - sender, - sender_type, - } => { - self.match_relations(rel_type, sender, sender_type, user_id, event_type_pattern)? + KnownCondition::RoomVersionSupports { feature } => { + if !self.msc3931_enabled { + false + } else { + let flag = feature.to_string(); + KNOWN_RVER_FLAGS.contains(&flag) + && self.room_version_feature_flags.contains(&flag) + } } }; Ok(result) } - /// Evaluates a relation condition. - fn match_relations( + /// Evaluates a `event_match` condition. + fn match_event_match( &self, - rel_type: &str, - sender: &Option<Cow<str>>, - sender_type: &Option<Cow<str>>, + event_match: &EventMatchCondition, user_id: Option<&str>, - event_type_pattern: &Option<Cow<str>>, ) -> Result<bool, Error> { - // First check if relation matching is enabled... - if !self.relation_match_enabled { - return Ok(false); - } - - // ... and if there are any relations to match against. - let relations = if let Some(relations) = self.relations.get(rel_type) { - relations - } else { - return Ok(false); - }; - - // Extract the sender pattern from the condition - let sender_pattern = if let Some(sender) = sender { - Some(sender.as_ref()) - } else if let Some(sender_type) = sender_type { - if sender_type == "user_id" { - if let Some(user_id) = user_id { - Some(user_id) - } else { - return Ok(false); - } + let pattern = if let Some(pattern) = &event_match.pattern { + pattern + } else if let Some(pattern_type) = &event_match.pattern_type { + // The `pattern_type` can either be "user_id" or "user_localpart", + // either way if we don't have a `user_id` then the condition can't + // match. + let user_id = if let Some(user_id) = user_id { + user_id } else { - warn!("Unrecognized sender_type: {sender_type}"); return Ok(false); + }; + + match &**pattern_type { + "user_id" => user_id, + "user_localpart" => get_localpart_from_id(user_id)?, + _ => return Ok(false), } } else { - None + return Ok(false); }; - let mut sender_compiled_pattern = if let Some(pattern) = sender_pattern { - Some(get_glob_matcher(pattern, GlobMatchType::Whole)?) + let haystack = if let Some(haystack) = self.flattened_keys.get(&*event_match.key) { + haystack } else { - None + return Ok(false); }; - let mut type_compiled_pattern = if let Some(pattern) = event_type_pattern { - Some(get_glob_matcher(pattern, GlobMatchType::Whole)?) + // For the content.body we match against "words", but for everything + // else we match against the entire value. + let match_type = if event_match.key == "content.body" { + GlobMatchType::Word } else { - None + GlobMatchType::Whole }; - for (relation_sender, event_type) in relations { - if let Some(pattern) = &mut sender_compiled_pattern { - if !pattern.is_match(relation_sender)? { - continue; - } - } - - if let Some(pattern) = &mut type_compiled_pattern { - if !pattern.is_match(event_type)? { - continue; - } - } - - return Ok(true); - } - - Ok(false) + let mut compiled_pattern = get_glob_matcher(pattern, match_type)?; + compiled_pattern.is_match(haystack) } - /// Evaluates a `event_match` condition. - fn match_event_match( + /// Evaluates a `related_event_match` condition. (MSC3664) + fn match_related_event_match( &self, - event_match: &EventMatchCondition, + event_match: &RelatedEventMatchCondition, user_id: Option<&str>, ) -> Result<bool, Error> { + // First check if related event matching is enabled... + if !self.related_event_match_enabled { + return Ok(false); + } + + // get the related event, fail if there is none. + let event = if let Some(event) = self.related_events_flattened.get(&*event_match.rel_type) { + event + } else { + return Ok(false); + }; + + // If we are not matching fallbacks, don't match if our special key indicating this is a + // fallback relation is not present. + if !event_match.include_fallbacks.unwrap_or(false) + && event.contains_key("im.vector.is_falling_back") + { + return Ok(false); + } + + // if we have no key, accept the event as matching, if it existed without matching any + // fields. + let key = if let Some(key) = &event_match.key { + key + } else { + return Ok(true); + }; + let pattern = if let Some(pattern) = &event_match.pattern { pattern } else if let Some(pattern_type) = &event_match.pattern_type { @@ -313,7 +376,7 @@ impl PushRuleEvaluator { return Ok(false); }; - let haystack = if let Some(haystack) = self.flattened_keys.get(&*event_match.key) { + let haystack = if let Some(haystack) = event.get(&**key) { haystack } else { return Ok(false); @@ -321,7 +384,7 @@ impl PushRuleEvaluator { // For the content.body we match against "words", but for everything // else we match against the entire value. - let match_type = if event_match.key == "content.body" { + let match_type = if key == "content.body" { GlobMatchType::Word } else { GlobMatchType::Whole @@ -366,9 +429,63 @@ fn push_rule_evaluator() { BTreeMap::new(), BTreeMap::new(), true, + vec![], + true, ) .unwrap(); let result = evaluator.run(&FilteredPushRules::default(), None, Some("bob")); assert_eq!(result.len(), 3); } + +#[test] +fn test_requires_room_version_supports_condition() { + use std::borrow::Cow; + + use crate::push::{PushRule, PushRules}; + + let mut flattened_keys = BTreeMap::new(); + flattened_keys.insert("content.body".to_string(), "foo bar bob hello".to_string()); + let flags = vec![RoomVersionFeatures::ExtensibleEvents.as_str().to_string()]; + let evaluator = PushRuleEvaluator::py_new( + flattened_keys, + 10, + Some(0), + BTreeMap::new(), + BTreeMap::new(), + false, + flags, + true, + ) + .unwrap(); + + // first test: are the master and contains_user_name rules excluded from the "requires room + // version condition" check? + let mut result = evaluator.run( + &FilteredPushRules::default(), + Some("@bob:example.org"), + None, + ); + assert_eq!(result.len(), 3); + + // second test: if an appropriate push rule is in play, does it get handled? + let custom_rule = PushRule { + rule_id: Cow::from("global/underride/.org.example.extensible"), + priority_class: 1, // underride + conditions: Cow::from(vec![Condition::Known( + KnownCondition::RoomVersionSupports { + feature: Cow::from(RoomVersionFeatures::ExtensibleEvents.as_str().to_string()), + }, + )]), + actions: Cow::from(vec![Action::Notify]), + default: false, + default_enabled: true, + }; + let rules = PushRules::new(vec![custom_rule]); + result = evaluator.run( + &FilteredPushRules::py_new(rules, BTreeMap::new(), true, true), + None, + None, + ); + assert_eq!(result.len(), 1); +}