diff options
-rw-r--r-- | changelog.d/14958.feature | 1 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | rust/benches/evaluator.rs | 4 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | rust/src/push/evaluator.rs | 19 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | stubs/synapse/synapse_rust/push.pyi | 1 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | synapse/push/bulk_push_rule_evaluator.py | 9 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tests/push/test_bulk_push_rule_evaluator.py | 191 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tests/push/test_push_rule_evaluator.py | 18 |
7 files changed, 184 insertions, 59 deletions
diff --git a/changelog.d/14958.feature b/changelog.d/14958.feature new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..8293e99eff --- /dev/null +++ b/changelog.d/14958.feature @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +Experimental support for [MSC3952](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/3952): intentional mentions. diff --git a/rust/benches/evaluator.rs b/rust/benches/evaluator.rs index 6b16a3f75b..859d54961c 100644 --- a/rust/benches/evaluator.rs +++ b/rust/benches/evaluator.rs @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ fn bench_match_exact(b: &mut Bencher) { let eval = PushRuleEvaluator::py_new( flattened_keys, + false, BTreeSet::new(), false, 10, @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ fn bench_match_word(b: &mut Bencher) { let eval = PushRuleEvaluator::py_new( flattened_keys, + false, BTreeSet::new(), false, 10, @@ -109,6 +111,7 @@ fn bench_match_word_miss(b: &mut Bencher) { let eval = PushRuleEvaluator::py_new( flattened_keys, + false, BTreeSet::new(), false, 10, @@ -147,6 +150,7 @@ fn bench_eval_message(b: &mut Bencher) { let eval = PushRuleEvaluator::py_new( flattened_keys, + false, BTreeSet::new(), false, 10, diff --git a/rust/src/push/evaluator.rs b/rust/src/push/evaluator.rs index aa71202e43..da6f704c0e 100644 --- a/rust/src/push/evaluator.rs +++ b/rust/src/push/evaluator.rs @@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ pub struct PushRuleEvaluator { /// The "content.body", if any. body: String, + /// True if the event has a mentions property and MSC3952 support is enabled. + has_mentions: bool, /// The user mentions that were part of the message. user_mentions: BTreeSet<String>, /// True if the message is a room message. @@ -105,6 +107,7 @@ impl PushRuleEvaluator { #[new] pub fn py_new( flattened_keys: BTreeMap<String, String>, + has_mentions: bool, user_mentions: BTreeSet<String>, room_mention: bool, room_member_count: u64, @@ -123,6 +126,7 @@ impl PushRuleEvaluator { Ok(PushRuleEvaluator { flattened_keys, body, + has_mentions, user_mentions, room_mention, room_member_count, @@ -155,6 +159,19 @@ impl PushRuleEvaluator { } let rule_id = &push_rule.rule_id().to_string(); + + // For backwards-compatibility the legacy mention rules are disabled + // if the event contains the 'm.mentions' property (and if the + // experimental feature is enabled, both of these are represented + // by the has_mentions flag). + if self.has_mentions + && (rule_id == "global/override/.m.rule.contains_display_name" + || rule_id == "global/content/.m.rule.contains_user_name" + || rule_id == "global/override/.m.rule.roomnotif") + { + continue; + } + let extev_flag = &RoomVersionFeatures::ExtensibleEvents.as_str().to_string(); let supports_extensible_events = self.room_version_feature_flags.contains(extev_flag); let safe_from_rver_condition = SAFE_EXTENSIBLE_EVENTS_RULE_IDS.contains(rule_id); @@ -441,6 +458,7 @@ fn push_rule_evaluator() { flattened_keys.insert("content.body".to_string(), "foo bar bob hello".to_string()); let evaluator = PushRuleEvaluator::py_new( flattened_keys, + false, BTreeSet::new(), false, 10, @@ -468,6 +486,7 @@ fn test_requires_room_version_supports_condition() { let flags = vec![RoomVersionFeatures::ExtensibleEvents.as_str().to_string()]; let evaluator = PushRuleEvaluator::py_new( flattened_keys, + false, BTreeSet::new(), false, 10, diff --git a/stubs/synapse/synapse_rust/push.pyi b/stubs/synapse/synapse_rust/push.pyi index 588d90c25a..c0af2af3df 100644 --- a/stubs/synapse/synapse_rust/push.pyi +++ b/stubs/synapse/synapse_rust/push.pyi @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ class PushRuleEvaluator: def __init__( self, flattened_keys: Mapping[str, str], + has_mentions: bool, user_mentions: Set[str], room_mention: bool, room_member_count: int, diff --git a/synapse/push/bulk_push_rule_evaluator.py b/synapse/push/bulk_push_rule_evaluator.py index 88cfc05d05..9bf92b9765 100644 --- a/synapse/push/bulk_push_rule_evaluator.py +++ b/synapse/push/bulk_push_rule_evaluator.py @@ -119,6 +119,9 @@ class BulkPushRuleEvaluator: self.should_calculate_push_rules = self.hs.config.push.enable_push self._related_event_match_enabled = self.hs.config.experimental.msc3664_enabled + self._intentional_mentions_enabled = ( + self.hs.config.experimental.msc3952_intentional_mentions + ) self.room_push_rule_cache_metrics = register_cache( "cache", @@ -364,9 +367,12 @@ class BulkPushRuleEvaluator: # Pull out any user and room mentions. mentions = event.content.get(EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS) + has_mentions = self._intentional_mentions_enabled and isinstance(mentions, dict) user_mentions: Set[str] = set() room_mention = False - if isinstance(mentions, dict): + if has_mentions: + # mypy seems to have lost the type even though it must be a dict here. + assert isinstance(mentions, dict) # Remove out any non-string items and convert to a set. user_mentions_raw = mentions.get("user_ids") if isinstance(user_mentions_raw, list): @@ -378,6 +384,7 @@ class BulkPushRuleEvaluator: evaluator = PushRuleEvaluator( _flatten_dict(event, room_version=event.room_version), + has_mentions, user_mentions, room_mention, room_member_count, diff --git a/tests/push/test_bulk_push_rule_evaluator.py b/tests/push/test_bulk_push_rule_evaluator.py index fda48d9f61..3b2d082dcb 100644 --- a/tests/push/test_bulk_push_rule_evaluator.py +++ b/tests/push/test_bulk_push_rule_evaluator.py @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ # See the License for the specific language governing permissions and # limitations under the License. -from typing import Any +from typing import Any, Optional from unittest.mock import patch from parameterized import parameterized @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ from synapse.push.bulk_push_rule_evaluator import BulkPushRuleEvaluator from synapse.rest import admin from synapse.rest.client import login, register, room from synapse.server import HomeServer -from synapse.types import create_requester +from synapse.types import JsonDict, create_requester from synapse.util import Clock from tests.test_utils import simple_async_mock @@ -196,77 +196,144 @@ class TestBulkPushRuleEvaluator(HomeserverTestCase): self.get_success(bulk_evaluator.action_for_events_by_user([(event, context)])) bulk_evaluator._action_for_event_by_user.assert_not_called() - @override_config({"experimental_features": {"msc3952_intentional_mentions": True}}) - def test_mentions(self) -> None: - """Test the behavior of an event which includes invalid mentions.""" - bulk_evaluator = BulkPushRuleEvaluator(self.hs) - - sentinel = object() - - def create_and_process(mentions: Any = sentinel) -> bool: - """Returns true iff the `mentions` trigger an event push action.""" - content = {} - if mentions is not sentinel: - content[EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS] = mentions - - # Create a new message event which should cause a notification. - event, context = self.get_success( - self.event_creation_handler.create_event( - self.requester, - { - "type": "test", - "room_id": self.room_id, - "content": content, - "sender": f"@bob:{self.hs.hostname}", - }, - ) + def _create_and_process( + self, bulk_evaluator: BulkPushRuleEvaluator, content: Optional[JsonDict] = None + ) -> bool: + """Returns true iff the `mentions` trigger an event push action.""" + # Create a new message event which should cause a notification. + event, context = self.get_success( + self.event_creation_handler.create_event( + self.requester, + { + "type": "test", + "room_id": self.room_id, + "content": content or {}, + "sender": f"@bob:{self.hs.hostname}", + }, ) + ) - # Ensure no actions are generated! - self.get_success( - bulk_evaluator.action_for_events_by_user([(event, context)]) - ) + # Execute the push rule machinery. + self.get_success(bulk_evaluator.action_for_events_by_user([(event, context)])) - # If any actions are generated for this event, return true. - result = self.get_success( - self.hs.get_datastores().main.db_pool.simple_select_list( - table="event_push_actions_staging", - keyvalues={"event_id": event.event_id}, - retcols=("*",), - desc="get_event_push_actions_staging", - ) + # If any actions are generated for this event, return true. + result = self.get_success( + self.hs.get_datastores().main.db_pool.simple_select_list( + table="event_push_actions_staging", + keyvalues={"event_id": event.event_id}, + retcols=("*",), + desc="get_event_push_actions_staging", ) - return len(result) > 0 + ) + return len(result) > 0 + + @override_config({"experimental_features": {"msc3952_intentional_mentions": True}}) + def test_user_mentions(self) -> None: + """Test the behavior of an event which includes invalid user mentions.""" + bulk_evaluator = BulkPushRuleEvaluator(self.hs) # Not including the mentions field should not notify. - self.assertFalse(create_and_process()) + self.assertFalse(self._create_and_process(bulk_evaluator)) # An empty mentions field should not notify. - self.assertFalse(create_and_process({})) + self.assertFalse( + self._create_and_process( + bulk_evaluator, {EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {}} + ) + ) # Non-dict mentions should be ignored. mentions: Any for mentions in (None, True, False, 1, "foo", []): - self.assertFalse(create_and_process(mentions)) + self.assertFalse( + self._create_and_process( + bulk_evaluator, {EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: mentions} + ) + ) # A non-list should be ignored. for mentions in (None, True, False, 1, "foo", {}): - self.assertFalse(create_and_process({"user_ids": mentions})) + self.assertFalse( + self._create_and_process( + bulk_evaluator, + {EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {"user_ids": mentions}}, + ) + ) # The Matrix ID appearing anywhere in the list should notify. - self.assertTrue(create_and_process({"user_ids": [self.alice]})) - self.assertTrue(create_and_process({"user_ids": ["@another:test", self.alice]})) + self.assertTrue( + self._create_and_process( + bulk_evaluator, + {EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {"user_ids": [self.alice]}}, + ) + ) + self.assertTrue( + self._create_and_process( + bulk_evaluator, + { + EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: { + "user_ids": ["@another:test", self.alice] + } + }, + ) + ) # Duplicate user IDs should notify. - self.assertTrue(create_and_process({"user_ids": [self.alice, self.alice]})) + self.assertTrue( + self._create_and_process( + bulk_evaluator, + { + EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: { + "user_ids": [self.alice, self.alice] + } + }, + ) + ) # Invalid entries in the list are ignored. - self.assertFalse(create_and_process({"user_ids": [None, True, False, {}, []]})) + self.assertFalse( + self._create_and_process( + bulk_evaluator, + { + EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: { + "user_ids": [None, True, False, {}, []] + } + }, + ) + ) self.assertTrue( - create_and_process({"user_ids": [None, True, False, {}, [], self.alice]}) + self._create_and_process( + bulk_evaluator, + { + EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: { + "user_ids": [None, True, False, {}, [], self.alice] + } + }, + ) ) + # The legacy push rule should not mention if the mentions field exists. + self.assertFalse( + self._create_and_process( + bulk_evaluator, + { + "body": self.alice, + "msgtype": "m.text", + EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {}, + }, + ) + ) + + @override_config({"experimental_features": {"msc3952_intentional_mentions": True}}) + def test_room_mentions(self) -> None: + """Test the behavior of an event which includes invalid room mentions.""" + bulk_evaluator = BulkPushRuleEvaluator(self.hs) + # Room mentions from those without power should not notify. - self.assertFalse(create_and_process({"room": True})) + self.assertFalse( + self._create_and_process( + bulk_evaluator, {EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {"room": True}} + ) + ) # Room mentions from those with power should notify. self.helper.send_state( @@ -276,8 +343,30 @@ class TestBulkPushRuleEvaluator(HomeserverTestCase): self.token, state_key="", ) - self.assertTrue(create_and_process({"room": True})) + self.assertTrue( + self._create_and_process( + bulk_evaluator, {EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {"room": True}} + ) + ) # Invalid data should not notify. + mentions: Any for mentions in (None, False, 1, "foo", [], {}): - self.assertFalse(create_and_process({"room": mentions})) + self.assertFalse( + self._create_and_process( + bulk_evaluator, + {EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {"room": mentions}}, + ) + ) + + # The legacy push rule should not mention if the mentions field exists. + self.assertFalse( + self._create_and_process( + bulk_evaluator, + { + "body": "@room", + "msgtype": "m.text", + EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS: {}, + }, + ) + ) diff --git a/tests/push/test_push_rule_evaluator.py b/tests/push/test_push_rule_evaluator.py index 9d01c989d4..81661e181b 100644 --- a/tests/push/test_push_rule_evaluator.py +++ b/tests/push/test_push_rule_evaluator.py @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ class PushRuleEvaluatorTestCase(unittest.TestCase): self, content: JsonMapping, *, + has_mentions: bool = False, user_mentions: Optional[Set[str]] = None, room_mention: bool = False, related_events: Optional[JsonDict] = None, @@ -62,6 +63,7 @@ class PushRuleEvaluatorTestCase(unittest.TestCase): power_levels: Dict[str, Union[int, Dict[str, int]]] = {} return PushRuleEvaluator( _flatten_dict(event), + has_mentions, user_mentions or set(), room_mention, room_member_count, @@ -102,19 +104,21 @@ class PushRuleEvaluatorTestCase(unittest.TestCase): condition = {"kind": "org.matrix.msc3952.is_user_mention"} # No mentions shouldn't match. - evaluator = self._get_evaluator({}) + evaluator = self._get_evaluator({}, has_mentions=True) self.assertFalse(evaluator.matches(condition, "@user:test", None)) # An empty set shouldn't match - evaluator = self._get_evaluator({}, user_mentions=set()) + evaluator = self._get_evaluator({}, has_mentions=True, user_mentions=set()) self.assertFalse(evaluator.matches(condition, "@user:test", None)) # The Matrix ID appearing anywhere in the mentions list should match - evaluator = self._get_evaluator({}, user_mentions={"@user:test"}) + evaluator = self._get_evaluator( + {}, has_mentions=True, user_mentions={"@user:test"} + ) self.assertTrue(evaluator.matches(condition, "@user:test", None)) evaluator = self._get_evaluator( - {}, user_mentions={"@another:test", "@user:test"} + {}, has_mentions=True, user_mentions={"@another:test", "@user:test"} ) self.assertTrue(evaluator.matches(condition, "@user:test", None)) @@ -126,16 +130,16 @@ class PushRuleEvaluatorTestCase(unittest.TestCase): condition = {"kind": "org.matrix.msc3952.is_room_mention"} # No room mention shouldn't match. - evaluator = self._get_evaluator({}) + evaluator = self._get_evaluator({}, has_mentions=True) self.assertFalse(evaluator.matches(condition, None, None)) # Room mention should match. - evaluator = self._get_evaluator({}, room_mention=True) + evaluator = self._get_evaluator({}, has_mentions=True, room_mention=True) self.assertTrue(evaluator.matches(condition, None, None)) # A room mention and user mention is valid. evaluator = self._get_evaluator( - {}, user_mentions={"@another:test"}, room_mention=True + {}, has_mentions=True, user_mentions={"@another:test"}, room_mention=True ) self.assertTrue(evaluator.matches(condition, None, None)) |