diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | changelog.d/10940.misc | 1 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | synapse/event_auth.py | 153 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | synapse/handlers/event_auth.py | 15 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | synapse/handlers/federation.py | 30 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | synapse/handlers/federation_event.py | 18 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | synapse/handlers/message.py | 6 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | synapse/handlers/room.py | 6 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | synapse/state/v1.py | 8 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | synapse/state/v2.py | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/test_event_auth.py | 108 |
10 files changed, 177 insertions, 172 deletions
diff --git a/changelog.d/10940.misc b/changelog.d/10940.misc new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..9a765435db --- /dev/null +++ b/changelog.d/10940.misc @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +Clean up some of the federation event authentication code for clarity. diff --git a/synapse/event_auth.py b/synapse/event_auth.py index 5d7c6fa858..eef354de6e 100644 --- a/synapse/event_auth.py +++ b/synapse/event_auth.py @@ -41,42 +41,112 @@ from synapse.types import StateMap, UserID, get_domain_from_id logger = logging.getLogger(__name__) -def check( - room_version_obj: RoomVersion, - event: EventBase, - auth_events: StateMap[EventBase], - do_sig_check: bool = True, - do_size_check: bool = True, +def validate_event_for_room_version( + room_version_obj: RoomVersion, event: EventBase ) -> None: - """Checks if this event is correctly authed. + """Ensure that the event complies with the limits, and has the right signatures + + NB: does not *validate* the signatures - it assumes that any signatures present + have already been checked. + + NB: it does not check that the event satisfies the auth rules (that is done in + check_auth_rules_for_event) - these tests are independent of the rest of the state + in the room. + + NB: This is used to check events that have been received over federation. As such, + it can only enforce the checks specified in the relevant room version, to avoid + a split-brain situation where some servers accept such events, and others reject + them. + + TODO: consider moving this into EventValidator Args: - room_version_obj: the version of the room - event: the event being checked. - auth_events: the existing room state. - do_sig_check: True if it should be verified that the sending server - signed the event. - do_size_check: True if the size of the event fields should be verified. + room_version_obj: the version of the room which contains this event + event: the event to be checked Raises: - AuthError if the checks fail - - Returns: - if the auth checks pass. + SynapseError if there is a problem with the event """ - assert isinstance(auth_events, dict) - - if do_size_check: - _check_size_limits(event) + _check_size_limits(event) if not hasattr(event, "room_id"): raise AuthError(500, "Event has no room_id: %s" % event) - room_id = event.room_id + # check that the event has the correct signatures + sender_domain = get_domain_from_id(event.sender) + + is_invite_via_3pid = ( + event.type == EventTypes.Member + and event.membership == Membership.INVITE + and "third_party_invite" in event.content + ) + + # Check the sender's domain has signed the event + if not event.signatures.get(sender_domain): + # We allow invites via 3pid to have a sender from a different + # HS, as the sender must match the sender of the original + # 3pid invite. This is checked further down with the + # other dedicated membership checks. + if not is_invite_via_3pid: + raise AuthError(403, "Event not signed by sender's server") + + if event.format_version in (EventFormatVersions.V1,): + # Only older room versions have event IDs to check. + event_id_domain = get_domain_from_id(event.event_id) + + # Check the origin domain has signed the event + if not event.signatures.get(event_id_domain): + raise AuthError(403, "Event not signed by sending server") + + is_invite_via_allow_rule = ( + room_version_obj.msc3083_join_rules + and event.type == EventTypes.Member + and event.membership == Membership.JOIN + and "join_authorised_via_users_server" in event.content + ) + if is_invite_via_allow_rule: + authoriser_domain = get_domain_from_id( + event.content["join_authorised_via_users_server"] + ) + if not event.signatures.get(authoriser_domain): + raise AuthError(403, "Event not signed by authorising server") + + +def check_auth_rules_for_event( + room_version_obj: RoomVersion, event: EventBase, auth_events: StateMap[EventBase] +) -> None: + """Check that an event complies with the auth rules + + Checks whether an event passes the auth rules with a given set of state events + + Assumes that we have already checked that the event is the right shape (it has + enough signatures, has a room ID, etc). In other words: + + - it's fine for use in state resolution, when we have already decided whether to + accept the event or not, and are now trying to decide whether it should make it + into the room state + + - when we're doing the initial event auth, it is only suitable in combination with + a bunch of other tests. + + Args: + room_version_obj: the version of the room + event: the event being checked. + auth_events: the room state to check the events against. + + Raises: + AuthError if the checks fail + """ + assert isinstance(auth_events, dict) # We need to ensure that the auth events are actually for the same room, to # stop people from using powers they've been granted in other rooms for # example. + # + # Arguably we don't need to do this when we're just doing state res, as presumably + # the state res algorithm isn't silly enough to give us events from different rooms. + # Still, it's easier to do it anyway. + room_id = event.room_id for auth_event in auth_events.values(): if auth_event.room_id != room_id: raise AuthError( @@ -86,45 +156,6 @@ def check( % (event.event_id, room_id, auth_event.event_id, auth_event.room_id), ) - if do_sig_check: - sender_domain = get_domain_from_id(event.sender) - - is_invite_via_3pid = ( - event.type == EventTypes.Member - and event.membership == Membership.INVITE - and "third_party_invite" in event.content - ) - - # Check the sender's domain has signed the event - if not event.signatures.get(sender_domain): - # We allow invites via 3pid to have a sender from a different - # HS, as the sender must match the sender of the original - # 3pid invite. This is checked further down with the - # other dedicated membership checks. - if not is_invite_via_3pid: - raise AuthError(403, "Event not signed by sender's server") - - if event.format_version in (EventFormatVersions.V1,): - # Only older room versions have event IDs to check. - event_id_domain = get_domain_from_id(event.event_id) - - # Check the origin domain has signed the event - if not event.signatures.get(event_id_domain): - raise AuthError(403, "Event not signed by sending server") - - is_invite_via_allow_rule = ( - room_version_obj.msc3083_join_rules - and event.type == EventTypes.Member - and event.membership == Membership.JOIN - and "join_authorised_via_users_server" in event.content - ) - if is_invite_via_allow_rule: - authoriser_domain = get_domain_from_id( - event.content["join_authorised_via_users_server"] - ) - if not event.signatures.get(authoriser_domain): - raise AuthError(403, "Event not signed by authorising server") - # Implementation of https://matrix.org/docs/spec/rooms/v1#authorization-rules # # 1. If type is m.room.create: diff --git a/synapse/handlers/event_auth.py b/synapse/handlers/event_auth.py index cb81fa0986..d089c56286 100644 --- a/synapse/handlers/event_auth.py +++ b/synapse/handlers/event_auth.py @@ -22,7 +22,8 @@ from synapse.api.constants import ( RestrictedJoinRuleTypes, ) from synapse.api.errors import AuthError, Codes, SynapseError -from synapse.api.room_versions import KNOWN_ROOM_VERSIONS, RoomVersion +from synapse.api.room_versions import RoomVersion +from synapse.event_auth import check_auth_rules_for_event from synapse.events import EventBase from synapse.events.builder import EventBuilder from synapse.events.snapshot import EventContext @@ -45,21 +46,17 @@ class EventAuthHandler: self._store = hs.get_datastore() self._server_name = hs.hostname - async def check_from_context( + async def check_auth_rules_from_context( self, - room_version: str, + room_version_obj: RoomVersion, event: EventBase, context: EventContext, - do_sig_check: bool = True, ) -> None: + """Check an event passes the auth rules at its own auth events""" auth_event_ids = event.auth_event_ids() auth_events_by_id = await self._store.get_events(auth_event_ids) auth_events = {(e.type, e.state_key): e for e in auth_events_by_id.values()} - - room_version_obj = KNOWN_ROOM_VERSIONS[room_version] - event_auth.check( - room_version_obj, event, auth_events=auth_events, do_sig_check=do_sig_check - ) + check_auth_rules_for_event(room_version_obj, event, auth_events) def compute_auth_events( self, diff --git a/synapse/handlers/federation.py b/synapse/handlers/federation.py index 3b0b895b07..0a10a5c28a 100644 --- a/synapse/handlers/federation.py +++ b/synapse/handlers/federation.py @@ -40,6 +40,10 @@ from synapse.api.errors import ( ) from synapse.api.room_versions import KNOWN_ROOM_VERSIONS, RoomVersion, RoomVersions from synapse.crypto.event_signing import compute_event_signature +from synapse.event_auth import ( + check_auth_rules_for_event, + validate_event_for_room_version, +) from synapse.events import EventBase from synapse.events.snapshot import EventContext from synapse.events.validator import EventValidator @@ -742,10 +746,9 @@ class FederationHandler(BaseHandler): # The remote hasn't signed it yet, obviously. We'll do the full checks # when we get the event back in `on_send_join_request` - await self._event_auth_handler.check_from_context( - room_version.identifier, event, context, do_sig_check=False + await self._event_auth_handler.check_auth_rules_from_context( + room_version, event, context ) - return event async def on_invite_request( @@ -916,8 +919,8 @@ class FederationHandler(BaseHandler): try: # The remote hasn't signed it yet, obviously. We'll do the full checks # when we get the event back in `on_send_leave_request` - await self._event_auth_handler.check_from_context( - room_version_obj.identifier, event, context, do_sig_check=False + await self._event_auth_handler.check_auth_rules_from_context( + room_version_obj, event, context ) except AuthError as e: logger.warning("Failed to create new leave %r because %s", event, e) @@ -978,8 +981,8 @@ class FederationHandler(BaseHandler): try: # The remote hasn't signed it yet, obviously. We'll do the full checks # when we get the event back in `on_send_knock_request` - await self._event_auth_handler.check_from_context( - room_version_obj.identifier, event, context, do_sig_check=False + await self._event_auth_handler.check_auth_rules_from_context( + room_version_obj, event, context ) except AuthError as e: logger.warning("Failed to create new knock %r because %s", event, e) @@ -1168,7 +1171,8 @@ class FederationHandler(BaseHandler): auth_for_e[(EventTypes.Create, "")] = create_event try: - event_auth.check(room_version, e, auth_events=auth_for_e) + validate_event_for_room_version(room_version, e) + check_auth_rules_for_event(room_version, e, auth_for_e) except SynapseError as err: # we may get SynapseErrors here as well as AuthErrors. For # instance, there are a couple of (ancient) events in some @@ -1266,8 +1270,9 @@ class FederationHandler(BaseHandler): event.internal_metadata.send_on_behalf_of = self.hs.hostname try: - await self._event_auth_handler.check_from_context( - room_version_obj.identifier, event, context + validate_event_for_room_version(room_version_obj, event) + await self._event_auth_handler.check_auth_rules_from_context( + room_version_obj, event, context ) except AuthError as e: logger.warning("Denying new third party invite %r because %s", event, e) @@ -1317,8 +1322,9 @@ class FederationHandler(BaseHandler): ) try: - await self._event_auth_handler.check_from_context( - room_version_obj.identifier, event, context + validate_event_for_room_version(room_version_obj, event) + await self._event_auth_handler.check_auth_rules_from_context( + room_version_obj, event, context ) except AuthError as e: logger.warning("Denying third party invite %r because %s", event, e) diff --git a/synapse/handlers/federation_event.py b/synapse/handlers/federation_event.py index 2c4644b4a3..e587b5b3b3 100644 --- a/synapse/handlers/federation_event.py +++ b/synapse/handlers/federation_event.py @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ from typing import ( from prometheus_client import Counter -from synapse import event_auth from synapse.api.constants import ( EventContentFields, EventTypes, @@ -47,7 +46,11 @@ from synapse.api.errors import ( SynapseError, ) from synapse.api.room_versions import KNOWN_ROOM_VERSIONS -from synapse.event_auth import auth_types_for_event +from synapse.event_auth import ( + auth_types_for_event, + check_auth_rules_for_event, + validate_event_for_room_version, +) from synapse.events import EventBase from synapse.events.snapshot import EventContext from synapse.federation.federation_client import InvalidResponseError @@ -1207,7 +1210,8 @@ class FederationEventHandler: context = EventContext.for_outlier() try: - event_auth.check(room_version_obj, event, auth_events=auth) + validate_event_for_room_version(room_version_obj, event) + check_auth_rules_for_event(room_version_obj, event, auth) except AuthError as e: logger.warning("Rejecting %r because %s", event, e) context.rejected = RejectedReason.AUTH_ERROR @@ -1282,7 +1286,8 @@ class FederationEventHandler: auth_events_for_auth = calculated_auth_event_map try: - event_auth.check(room_version_obj, event, auth_events=auth_events_for_auth) + validate_event_for_room_version(room_version_obj, event) + check_auth_rules_for_event(room_version_obj, event, auth_events_for_auth) except AuthError as e: logger.warning("Failed auth resolution for %r because %s", event, e) context.rejected = RejectedReason.AUTH_ERROR @@ -1394,7 +1399,10 @@ class FederationEventHandler: } try: - event_auth.check(room_version_obj, event, auth_events=current_auth_events) + # TODO: skip the call to validate_event_for_room_version? we should already + # have validated the event. + validate_event_for_room_version(room_version_obj, event) + check_auth_rules_for_event(room_version_obj, event, current_auth_events) except AuthError as e: logger.warning( "Soft-failing %r (from %s) because %s", diff --git a/synapse/handlers/message.py b/synapse/handlers/message.py index 3b8cc50ec0..cdac53037c 100644 --- a/synapse/handlers/message.py +++ b/synapse/handlers/message.py @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ from synapse.api.errors import ( ) from synapse.api.room_versions import KNOWN_ROOM_VERSIONS, RoomVersions from synapse.api.urls import ConsentURIBuilder +from synapse.event_auth import validate_event_for_room_version from synapse.events import EventBase from synapse.events.builder import EventBuilder from synapse.events.snapshot import EventContext @@ -1098,8 +1099,9 @@ class EventCreationHandler: assert event.content["membership"] == Membership.LEAVE else: try: - await self._event_auth_handler.check_from_context( - room_version_obj.identifier, event, context + validate_event_for_room_version(room_version_obj, event) + await self._event_auth_handler.check_auth_rules_from_context( + room_version_obj, event, context ) except AuthError as err: logger.warning("Denying new event %r because %s", event, err) diff --git a/synapse/handlers/room.py b/synapse/handlers/room.py index bf8a85f563..873e08258e 100644 --- a/synapse/handlers/room.py +++ b/synapse/handlers/room.py @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ from synapse.api.errors import ( ) from synapse.api.filtering import Filter from synapse.api.room_versions import KNOWN_ROOM_VERSIONS, RoomVersion +from synapse.event_auth import validate_event_for_room_version from synapse.events import EventBase from synapse.events.utils import copy_power_levels_contents from synapse.rest.admin._base import assert_user_is_admin @@ -238,8 +239,9 @@ class RoomCreationHandler(BaseHandler): }, ) old_room_version = await self.store.get_room_version(old_room_id) - await self._event_auth_handler.check_from_context( - old_room_version.identifier, tombstone_event, tombstone_context + validate_event_for_room_version(old_room_version, tombstone_event) + await self._event_auth_handler.check_auth_rules_from_context( + old_room_version, tombstone_event, tombstone_context ) await self.clone_existing_room( diff --git a/synapse/state/v1.py b/synapse/state/v1.py index 92336d7cc8..017e6fd92d 100644 --- a/synapse/state/v1.py +++ b/synapse/state/v1.py @@ -329,12 +329,10 @@ def _resolve_auth_events( auth_events[(prev_event.type, prev_event.state_key)] = prev_event try: # The signatures have already been checked at this point - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V1, event, auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, - do_size_check=False, ) prev_event = event except AuthError: @@ -349,12 +347,10 @@ def _resolve_normal_events( for event in _ordered_events(events): try: # The signatures have already been checked at this point - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V1, event, auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, - do_size_check=False, ) return event except AuthError: diff --git a/synapse/state/v2.py b/synapse/state/v2.py index 7b1e8361de..586b0e12fe 100644 --- a/synapse/state/v2.py +++ b/synapse/state/v2.py @@ -546,12 +546,10 @@ async def _iterative_auth_checks( auth_events[key] = event_map[ev_id] try: - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( room_version, event, auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, - do_size_check=False, ) resolved_state[(event.type, event.state_key)] = event_id diff --git a/tests/test_event_auth.py b/tests/test_event_auth.py index 6ebd01bcbe..e7a7d00883 100644 --- a/tests/test_event_auth.py +++ b/tests/test_event_auth.py @@ -37,21 +37,19 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): } # creator should be able to send state - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V1, _random_state_event(creator), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # joiner should not be able to send state self.assertRaises( AuthError, - event_auth.check, + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event, RoomVersions.V1, _random_state_event(joiner), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) def test_state_default_level(self): @@ -76,19 +74,17 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): # pleb should not be able to send state self.assertRaises( AuthError, - event_auth.check, + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event, RoomVersions.V1, _random_state_event(pleb), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ), # king should be able to send state - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V1, _random_state_event(king), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) def test_alias_event(self): @@ -101,37 +97,33 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): } # creator should be able to send aliases - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V1, _alias_event(creator), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # Reject an event with no state key. with self.assertRaises(AuthError): - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V1, _alias_event(creator, state_key=""), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # If the domain of the sender does not match the state key, reject. with self.assertRaises(AuthError): - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V1, _alias_event(creator, state_key="test.com"), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # Note that the member does *not* need to be in the room. - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V1, _alias_event(other), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) def test_msc2432_alias_event(self): @@ -144,34 +136,30 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): } # creator should be able to send aliases - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _alias_event(creator), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # No particular checks are done on the state key. - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _alias_event(creator, state_key=""), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _alias_event(creator, state_key="test.com"), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # Per standard auth rules, the member must be in the room. with self.assertRaises(AuthError): - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _alias_event(other), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) def test_msc2209(self): @@ -191,20 +179,18 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): } # pleb should be able to modify the notifications power level. - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V1, _power_levels_event(pleb, {"notifications": {"room": 100}}), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # But an MSC2209 room rejects this change. with self.assertRaises(AuthError): - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _power_levels_event(pleb, {"notifications": {"room": 100}}), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) def test_join_rules_public(self): @@ -221,59 +207,53 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): } # Check join. - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # A user cannot be force-joined to a room. with self.assertRaises(AuthError): - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _member_event(pleb, "join", sender=creator), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # Banned should be rejected. auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "ban") with self.assertRaises(AuthError): - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # A user who left can re-join. auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "leave") - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # A user can send a join if they're in the room. auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "join") - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # A user can accept an invite. auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event( pleb, "invite", sender=creator ) - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) def test_join_rules_invite(self): @@ -291,60 +271,54 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): # A join without an invite is rejected. with self.assertRaises(AuthError): - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # A user cannot be force-joined to a room. with self.assertRaises(AuthError): - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _member_event(pleb, "join", sender=creator), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # Banned should be rejected. auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "ban") with self.assertRaises(AuthError): - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # A user who left cannot re-join. auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "leave") with self.assertRaises(AuthError): - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # A user can send a join if they're in the room. auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "join") - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # A user can accept an invite. auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event( pleb, "invite", sender=creator ) - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) def test_join_rules_msc3083_restricted(self): @@ -369,11 +343,10 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): # Older room versions don't understand this join rule with self.assertRaises(AuthError): - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(pleb), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # A properly formatted join event should work. @@ -383,11 +356,10 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): "join_authorised_via_users_server": "@creator:example.com" }, ) - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V8, authorised_join_event, auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # A join issued by a specific user works (i.e. the power level checks @@ -399,7 +371,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): pl_auth_events[("m.room.member", "@inviter:foo.test")] = _join_event( "@inviter:foo.test" ) - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V8, _join_event( pleb, @@ -408,16 +380,14 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): }, ), pl_auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # A join which is missing an authorised server is rejected. with self.assertRaises(AuthError): - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V8, _join_event(pleb), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # An join authorised by a user who is not in the room is rejected. @@ -426,7 +396,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): creator, {"invite": 100, "users": {"@other:example.com": 150}} ) with self.assertRaises(AuthError): - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V8, _join_event( pleb, @@ -435,13 +405,12 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): }, ), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # A user cannot be force-joined to a room. (This uses an event which # *would* be valid, but is sent be a different user.) with self.assertRaises(AuthError): - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V8, _member_event( pleb, @@ -452,36 +421,32 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): }, ), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # Banned should be rejected. auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "ban") with self.assertRaises(AuthError): - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V8, authorised_join_event, auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # A user who left can re-join. auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "leave") - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V8, authorised_join_event, auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # A user can send a join if they're in the room. (This doesn't need to # be authorised since the user is already joined.) auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "join") - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V8, _join_event(pleb), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) # A user can accept an invite. (This doesn't need to be authorised since @@ -489,11 +454,10 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event( pleb, "invite", sender=creator ) - event_auth.check( + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( RoomVersions.V8, _join_event(pleb), auth_events, - do_sig_check=False, ) |