summary refs log tree commit diff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--changelog.d/7769.misc1
-rw-r--r--synapse/handlers/federation.py119
2 files changed, 56 insertions, 64 deletions
diff --git a/changelog.d/7769.misc b/changelog.d/7769.misc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..2e200286ce
--- /dev/null
+++ b/changelog.d/7769.misc
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+Add early returns to `_check_for_soft_fail`.
diff --git a/synapse/handlers/federation.py b/synapse/handlers/federation.py
index 8f0b9be791..fa5854578d 100644
--- a/synapse/handlers/federation.py
+++ b/synapse/handlers/federation.py
@@ -2061,76 +2061,67 @@ class FederationHandler(BaseHandler):
         # For new (non-backfilled and non-outlier) events we check if the event
         # passes auth based on the current state. If it doesn't then we
         # "soft-fail" the event.
-        do_soft_fail_check = not backfilled and not event.internal_metadata.is_outlier()
-        if do_soft_fail_check:
-            extrem_ids = await self.store.get_latest_event_ids_in_room(event.room_id)
-
-            extrem_ids = set(extrem_ids)
-            prev_event_ids = set(event.prev_event_ids())
-
-            if extrem_ids == prev_event_ids:
-                # If they're the same then the current state is the same as the
-                # state at the event, so no point rechecking auth for soft fail.
-                do_soft_fail_check = False
-
-        if do_soft_fail_check:
-            room_version = await self.store.get_room_version_id(event.room_id)
-            room_version_obj = KNOWN_ROOM_VERSIONS[room_version]
-
-            # Calculate the "current state".
-            if state is not None:
-                # If we're explicitly given the state then we won't have all the
-                # prev events, and so we have a gap in the graph. In this case
-                # we want to be a little careful as we might have been down for
-                # a while and have an incorrect view of the current state,
-                # however we still want to do checks as gaps are easy to
-                # maliciously manufacture.
-                #
-                # So we use a "current state" that is actually a state
-                # resolution across the current forward extremities and the
-                # given state at the event. This should correctly handle cases
-                # like bans, especially with state res v2.
+        if backfilled or event.internal_metadata.is_outlier():
+            return
 
-                state_sets = await self.state_store.get_state_groups(
-                    event.room_id, extrem_ids
-                )
-                state_sets = list(state_sets.values())
-                state_sets.append(state)
-                current_state_ids = await self.state_handler.resolve_events(
-                    room_version, state_sets, event
-                )
-                current_state_ids = {
-                    k: e.event_id for k, e in current_state_ids.items()
-                }
-            else:
-                current_state_ids = await self.state_handler.get_current_state_ids(
-                    event.room_id, latest_event_ids=extrem_ids
-                )
+        extrem_ids = await self.store.get_latest_event_ids_in_room(event.room_id)
+        extrem_ids = set(extrem_ids)
+        prev_event_ids = set(event.prev_event_ids())
 
-            logger.debug(
-                "Doing soft-fail check for %s: state %s",
-                event.event_id,
-                current_state_ids,
+        if extrem_ids == prev_event_ids:
+            # If they're the same then the current state is the same as the
+            # state at the event, so no point rechecking auth for soft fail.
+            return
+
+        room_version = await self.store.get_room_version_id(event.room_id)
+        room_version_obj = KNOWN_ROOM_VERSIONS[room_version]
+
+        # Calculate the "current state".
+        if state is not None:
+            # If we're explicitly given the state then we won't have all the
+            # prev events, and so we have a gap in the graph. In this case
+            # we want to be a little careful as we might have been down for
+            # a while and have an incorrect view of the current state,
+            # however we still want to do checks as gaps are easy to
+            # maliciously manufacture.
+            #
+            # So we use a "current state" that is actually a state
+            # resolution across the current forward extremities and the
+            # given state at the event. This should correctly handle cases
+            # like bans, especially with state res v2.
+
+            state_sets = await self.state_store.get_state_groups(
+                event.room_id, extrem_ids
+            )
+            state_sets = list(state_sets.values())
+            state_sets.append(state)
+            current_state_ids = await self.state_handler.resolve_events(
+                room_version, state_sets, event
+            )
+            current_state_ids = {k: e.event_id for k, e in current_state_ids.items()}
+        else:
+            current_state_ids = await self.state_handler.get_current_state_ids(
+                event.room_id, latest_event_ids=extrem_ids
             )
 
-            # Now check if event pass auth against said current state
-            auth_types = auth_types_for_event(event)
-            current_state_ids = [
-                e for k, e in current_state_ids.items() if k in auth_types
-            ]
+        logger.debug(
+            "Doing soft-fail check for %s: state %s", event.event_id, current_state_ids,
+        )
 
-            current_auth_events = await self.store.get_events(current_state_ids)
-            current_auth_events = {
-                (e.type, e.state_key): e for e in current_auth_events.values()
-            }
+        # Now check if event pass auth against said current state
+        auth_types = auth_types_for_event(event)
+        current_state_ids = [e for k, e in current_state_ids.items() if k in auth_types]
 
-            try:
-                event_auth.check(
-                    room_version_obj, event, auth_events=current_auth_events
-                )
-            except AuthError as e:
-                logger.warning("Soft-failing %r because %s", event, e)
-                event.internal_metadata.soft_failed = True
+        current_auth_events = await self.store.get_events(current_state_ids)
+        current_auth_events = {
+            (e.type, e.state_key): e for e in current_auth_events.values()
+        }
+
+        try:
+            event_auth.check(room_version_obj, event, auth_events=current_auth_events)
+        except AuthError as e:
+            logger.warning("Soft-failing %r because %s", event, e)
+            event.internal_metadata.soft_failed = True
 
     async def on_query_auth(
         self, origin, event_id, room_id, remote_auth_chain, rejects, missing