diff options
author | Richard van der Hoff <richard@matrix.org> | 2022-06-10 10:48:25 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Richard van der Hoff <richard@matrix.org> | 2022-06-12 23:13:10 +0100 |
commit | 0d9d36b15c3cd2851f1cf3452c096480f568e6cb (patch) | |
tree | 5039968d06b3e12ae487aa53ec785947b554f7f7 /tests/test_event_auth.py | |
parent | Remove `room_version` param from `validate_event_for_room_version` (diff) | |
download | synapse-0d9d36b15c3cd2851f1cf3452c096480f568e6cb.tar.xz |
Remove `room_version` param from `check_auth_rules_for_event`
Instead, use the `room_version` property of the event we're checking. The `room_version` was originally added as a parameter somewhere around #4482, but really it's been redundant since #6875 added a `room_version` field to `EventBase`.
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r-- | tests/test_event_auth.py | 43 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 41 deletions
diff --git a/tests/test_event_auth.py b/tests/test_event_auth.py index 1e11fb5dac..229ecd84a6 100644 --- a/tests/test_event_auth.py +++ b/tests/test_event_auth.py @@ -38,7 +38,6 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): # creator should be able to send state event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V9, _random_state_event(RoomVersions.V9, creator), auth_events, ) @@ -55,7 +54,6 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): self.assertRaises( AuthError, event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event, - RoomVersions.V9, _random_state_event(RoomVersions.V9, creator), auth_events, ) @@ -66,7 +64,6 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): self.assertRaises( AuthError, event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event, - RoomVersions.V9, _random_state_event(RoomVersions.V9, creator), auth_events, ) @@ -86,7 +83,6 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): # creator should be able to send state event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V1, _random_state_event(RoomVersions.V1, creator), auth_events, ) @@ -95,7 +91,6 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): self.assertRaises( AuthError, event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event, - RoomVersions.V1, _random_state_event(RoomVersions.V1, joiner), auth_events, ) @@ -125,14 +120,12 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): self.assertRaises( AuthError, event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event, - RoomVersions.V1, _random_state_event(RoomVersions.V1, pleb), auth_events, ), # king should be able to send state event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V1, _random_state_event(RoomVersions.V1, king), auth_events, ) @@ -148,7 +141,6 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): # creator should be able to send aliases event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V1, _alias_event(RoomVersions.V1, creator), auth_events, ) @@ -156,7 +148,6 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): # Reject an event with no state key. with self.assertRaises(AuthError): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V1, _alias_event(RoomVersions.V1, creator, state_key=""), auth_events, ) @@ -164,14 +155,12 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): # If the domain of the sender does not match the state key, reject. with self.assertRaises(AuthError): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V1, _alias_event(RoomVersions.V1, creator, state_key="test.com"), auth_events, ) # Note that the member does *not* need to be in the room. event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V1, _alias_event(RoomVersions.V1, other), auth_events, ) @@ -187,19 +176,16 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): # creator should be able to send aliases event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V6, _alias_event(RoomVersions.V6, creator), auth_events, ) # No particular checks are done on the state key. event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V6, _alias_event(RoomVersions.V6, creator, state_key=""), auth_events, ) event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V6, _alias_event(RoomVersions.V6, creator, state_key="test.com"), auth_events, ) @@ -207,7 +193,6 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): # Per standard auth rules, the member must be in the room. with self.assertRaises(AuthError): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V6, _alias_event(RoomVersions.V6, other), auth_events, ) @@ -235,14 +220,12 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): # on room V1, pleb should be able to modify the notifications power level. if allow_modification: - event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(room_version, pl_event, auth_events) + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(pl_event, auth_events) else: # But an MSC2209 room rejects this change. with self.assertRaises(AuthError): - event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - room_version, pl_event, auth_events - ) + event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(pl_event, auth_events) def test_join_rules_public(self): """ @@ -261,7 +244,6 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): # Check join. event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(RoomVersions.V6, pleb), auth_events.values(), ) @@ -269,7 +251,6 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): # A user cannot be force-joined to a room. with self.assertRaises(AuthError): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V6, _member_event(RoomVersions.V6, pleb, "join", sender=creator), auth_events.values(), ) @@ -280,7 +261,6 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): ) with self.assertRaises(AuthError): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(RoomVersions.V6, pleb), auth_events.values(), ) @@ -290,7 +270,6 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): RoomVersions.V6, pleb, "leave" ) event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(RoomVersions.V6, pleb), auth_events.values(), ) @@ -300,7 +279,6 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): RoomVersions.V6, pleb, "join" ) event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(RoomVersions.V6, pleb), auth_events.values(), ) @@ -310,7 +288,6 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): RoomVersions.V6, pleb, "invite", sender=creator ) event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(RoomVersions.V6, pleb), auth_events.values(), ) @@ -333,7 +310,6 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): # A join without an invite is rejected. with self.assertRaises(AuthError): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(RoomVersions.V6, pleb), auth_events.values(), ) @@ -341,7 +317,6 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): # A user cannot be force-joined to a room. with self.assertRaises(AuthError): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V6, _member_event(RoomVersions.V6, pleb, "join", sender=creator), auth_events.values(), ) @@ -352,7 +327,6 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): ) with self.assertRaises(AuthError): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(RoomVersions.V6, pleb), auth_events.values(), ) @@ -363,7 +337,6 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): ) with self.assertRaises(AuthError): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(RoomVersions.V6, pleb), auth_events.values(), ) @@ -373,7 +346,6 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): RoomVersions.V6, pleb, "join" ) event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(RoomVersions.V6, pleb), auth_events.values(), ) @@ -383,7 +355,6 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): RoomVersions.V6, pleb, "invite", sender=creator ) event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(RoomVersions.V6, pleb), auth_events.values(), ) @@ -406,7 +377,6 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): with self.assertRaises(AuthError): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V6, _join_event(RoomVersions.V6, pleb), auth_events.values(), ) @@ -444,7 +414,6 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): }, ) event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V8, authorised_join_event, auth_events.values(), ) @@ -461,7 +430,6 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): RoomVersions.V8, "@inviter:foo.test" ) event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V8, _join_event( RoomVersions.V8, pleb, @@ -475,7 +443,6 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): # A join which is missing an authorised server is rejected. with self.assertRaises(AuthError): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V8, _join_event(RoomVersions.V8, pleb), auth_events.values(), ) @@ -489,7 +456,6 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): ) with self.assertRaises(AuthError): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V8, _join_event( RoomVersions.V8, pleb, @@ -504,7 +470,6 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): # *would* be valid, but is sent be a different user.) with self.assertRaises(AuthError): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V8, _member_event( RoomVersions.V8, pleb, @@ -523,7 +488,6 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): ) with self.assertRaises(AuthError): event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V8, authorised_join_event, auth_events.values(), ) @@ -533,7 +497,6 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): RoomVersions.V8, pleb, "leave" ) event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V8, authorised_join_event, auth_events.values(), ) @@ -544,7 +507,6 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): RoomVersions.V8, pleb, "join" ) event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V8, _join_event(RoomVersions.V8, pleb), auth_events.values(), ) @@ -555,7 +517,6 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase): RoomVersions.V8, pleb, "invite", sender=creator ) event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event( - RoomVersions.V8, _join_event(RoomVersions.V8, pleb), auth_events.values(), ) |