diff options
author | Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com> | 2023-02-28 18:49:28 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2023-02-28 18:49:28 +0000 |
commit | 2b78981736f9004f99b1760e3e77b234f92755a7 (patch) | |
tree | cd2b98d97df09a663fec267da4130cafd0ceb377 /tests/rest | |
parent | Merge branch 'master' into develop (diff) | |
download | synapse-2b78981736f9004f99b1760e3e77b234f92755a7.tar.xz |
Remove support for aggregating reactions (#15172)
It turns out that no clients rely on server-side aggregation of `m.annotation` relationships: it's just not very useful as currently implemented. It's also non-trivial to calculate. I want to remove it from MSC2677, so to keep the implementation in line, let's remove it here.
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/rest')
-rw-r--r-- | tests/rest/client/test_relations.py | 178 |
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 150 deletions
diff --git a/tests/rest/client/test_relations.py b/tests/rest/client/test_relations.py index c8a6911d5e..a8a0a16141 100644 --- a/tests/rest/client/test_relations.py +++ b/tests/rest/client/test_relations.py @@ -1080,48 +1080,6 @@ class BundledAggregationsTestCase(BaseRelationsTestCase): ] assert_bundle(self._find_event_in_chunk(chunk)) - def test_annotation(self) -> None: - """ - Test that annotations get correctly bundled. - """ - # Setup by sending a variety of relations. - self._send_relation(RelationTypes.ANNOTATION, "m.reaction", "a") - self._send_relation( - RelationTypes.ANNOTATION, "m.reaction", "a", access_token=self.user2_token - ) - self._send_relation(RelationTypes.ANNOTATION, "m.reaction", "b") - - def assert_annotations(bundled_aggregations: JsonDict) -> None: - self.assertEqual( - { - "chunk": [ - {"type": "m.reaction", "key": "a", "count": 2}, - {"type": "m.reaction", "key": "b", "count": 1}, - ] - }, - bundled_aggregations, - ) - - self._test_bundled_aggregations(RelationTypes.ANNOTATION, assert_annotations, 7) - - def test_annotation_to_annotation(self) -> None: - """Any relation to an annotation should be ignored.""" - channel = self._send_relation(RelationTypes.ANNOTATION, "m.reaction", "a") - event_id = channel.json_body["event_id"] - self._send_relation( - RelationTypes.ANNOTATION, "m.reaction", "b", parent_id=event_id - ) - - # Fetch the initial annotation event to see if it has bundled aggregations. - channel = self.make_request( - "GET", - f"/_matrix/client/v3/rooms/{self.room}/event/{event_id}", - access_token=self.user_token, - ) - self.assertEquals(200, channel.code, channel.json_body) - # The first annotationt should not have any bundled aggregations. - self.assertNotIn("m.relations", channel.json_body["unsigned"]) - def test_reference(self) -> None: """ Test that references get correctly bundled. @@ -1138,7 +1096,7 @@ class BundledAggregationsTestCase(BaseRelationsTestCase): bundled_aggregations, ) - self._test_bundled_aggregations(RelationTypes.REFERENCE, assert_annotations, 7) + self._test_bundled_aggregations(RelationTypes.REFERENCE, assert_annotations, 6) def test_thread(self) -> None: """ @@ -1183,7 +1141,7 @@ class BundledAggregationsTestCase(BaseRelationsTestCase): # The "user" sent the root event and is making queries for the bundled # aggregations: they have participated. - self._test_bundled_aggregations(RelationTypes.THREAD, _gen_assert(True), 7) + self._test_bundled_aggregations(RelationTypes.THREAD, _gen_assert(True), 6) # The "user2" sent replies in the thread and is making queries for the # bundled aggregations: they have participated. # @@ -1208,9 +1166,10 @@ class BundledAggregationsTestCase(BaseRelationsTestCase): channel = self._send_relation(RelationTypes.THREAD, "m.room.test") thread_2 = channel.json_body["event_id"] - self._send_relation( - RelationTypes.ANNOTATION, "m.reaction", "a", parent_id=thread_2 + channel = self._send_relation( + RelationTypes.REFERENCE, "org.matrix.test", parent_id=thread_2 ) + reference_event_id = channel.json_body["event_id"] def assert_thread(bundled_aggregations: JsonDict) -> None: self.assertEqual(2, bundled_aggregations.get("count")) @@ -1235,17 +1194,15 @@ class BundledAggregationsTestCase(BaseRelationsTestCase): self.assert_dict( { "m.relations": { - RelationTypes.ANNOTATION: { - "chunk": [ - {"type": "m.reaction", "key": "a", "count": 1}, - ] + RelationTypes.REFERENCE: { + "chunk": [{"event_id": reference_event_id}] }, } }, bundled_aggregations["latest_event"].get("unsigned"), ) - self._test_bundled_aggregations(RelationTypes.THREAD, assert_thread, 7) + self._test_bundled_aggregations(RelationTypes.THREAD, assert_thread, 6) def test_nested_thread(self) -> None: """ @@ -1363,10 +1320,11 @@ class BundledAggregationsTestCase(BaseRelationsTestCase): channel = self._send_relation(RelationTypes.THREAD, "m.room.test") thread_id = channel.json_body["event_id"] - # Annotate the thread. - self._send_relation( - RelationTypes.ANNOTATION, "m.reaction", "a", parent_id=thread_id + # Make a reference to the thread. + channel = self._send_relation( + RelationTypes.REFERENCE, "org.matrix.test", parent_id=thread_id ) + reference_event_id = channel.json_body["event_id"] channel = self.make_request( "GET", @@ -1377,9 +1335,7 @@ class BundledAggregationsTestCase(BaseRelationsTestCase): self.assertEqual( channel.json_body["unsigned"].get("m.relations"), { - RelationTypes.ANNOTATION: { - "chunk": [{"count": 1, "key": "a", "type": "m.reaction"}] - }, + RelationTypes.REFERENCE: {"chunk": [{"event_id": reference_event_id}]}, }, ) @@ -1396,9 +1352,7 @@ class BundledAggregationsTestCase(BaseRelationsTestCase): self.assertEqual( thread_message["unsigned"].get("m.relations"), { - RelationTypes.ANNOTATION: { - "chunk": [{"count": 1, "key": "a", "type": "m.reaction"}] - }, + RelationTypes.REFERENCE: {"chunk": [{"event_id": reference_event_id}]}, }, ) @@ -1410,7 +1364,8 @@ class BundledAggregationsTestCase(BaseRelationsTestCase): Note that the spec allows for a server to return additional fields beyond what is specified. """ - self._send_relation(RelationTypes.ANNOTATION, "m.reaction", "a") + channel = self._send_relation(RelationTypes.REFERENCE, "org.matrix.test") + reference_event_id = channel.json_body["event_id"] # Note that the sync filter does not include "unsigned" as a field. filter = urllib.parse.quote_plus( @@ -1428,7 +1383,12 @@ class BundledAggregationsTestCase(BaseRelationsTestCase): # Ensure there's bundled aggregations on it. self.assertIn("unsigned", parent_event) - self.assertIn("m.relations", parent_event["unsigned"]) + self.assertEqual( + parent_event["unsigned"].get("m.relations"), + { + RelationTypes.REFERENCE: {"chunk": [{"event_id": reference_event_id}]}, + }, + ) class RelationIgnoredUserTestCase(BaseRelationsTestCase): @@ -1475,53 +1435,8 @@ class RelationIgnoredUserTestCase(BaseRelationsTestCase): return before_aggregations[relation_type], after_aggregations[relation_type] - def test_annotation(self) -> None: - """Annotations should ignore""" - # Send 2 from us, 2 from the to be ignored user. - allowed_event_ids = [] - ignored_event_ids = [] - channel = self._send_relation(RelationTypes.ANNOTATION, "m.reaction", key="a") - allowed_event_ids.append(channel.json_body["event_id"]) - channel = self._send_relation(RelationTypes.ANNOTATION, "m.reaction", key="b") - allowed_event_ids.append(channel.json_body["event_id"]) - channel = self._send_relation( - RelationTypes.ANNOTATION, - "m.reaction", - key="a", - access_token=self.user2_token, - ) - ignored_event_ids.append(channel.json_body["event_id"]) - channel = self._send_relation( - RelationTypes.ANNOTATION, - "m.reaction", - key="c", - access_token=self.user2_token, - ) - ignored_event_ids.append(channel.json_body["event_id"]) - - before_aggregations, after_aggregations = self._test_ignored_user( - RelationTypes.ANNOTATION, allowed_event_ids, ignored_event_ids - ) - - self.assertCountEqual( - before_aggregations["chunk"], - [ - {"type": "m.reaction", "key": "a", "count": 2}, - {"type": "m.reaction", "key": "b", "count": 1}, - {"type": "m.reaction", "key": "c", "count": 1}, - ], - ) - - self.assertCountEqual( - after_aggregations["chunk"], - [ - {"type": "m.reaction", "key": "a", "count": 1}, - {"type": "m.reaction", "key": "b", "count": 1}, - ], - ) - def test_reference(self) -> None: - """Annotations should ignore""" + """Aggregations should exclude reference relations from ignored users""" channel = self._send_relation(RelationTypes.REFERENCE, "m.room.test") allowed_event_ids = [channel.json_body["event_id"]] @@ -1544,7 +1459,7 @@ class RelationIgnoredUserTestCase(BaseRelationsTestCase): ) def test_thread(self) -> None: - """Annotations should ignore""" + """Aggregations should exclude thread releations from ignored users""" channel = self._send_relation(RelationTypes.THREAD, "m.room.test") allowed_event_ids = [channel.json_body["event_id"]] @@ -1618,43 +1533,6 @@ class RelationRedactionTestCase(BaseRelationsTestCase): for t in threads ] - def test_redact_relation_annotation(self) -> None: - """ - Test that annotations of an event are properly handled after the - annotation is redacted. - - The redacted relation should not be included in bundled aggregations or - the response to relations. - """ - channel = self._send_relation(RelationTypes.ANNOTATION, "m.reaction", "a") - to_redact_event_id = channel.json_body["event_id"] - - channel = self._send_relation( - RelationTypes.ANNOTATION, "m.reaction", "a", access_token=self.user2_token - ) - unredacted_event_id = channel.json_body["event_id"] - - # Both relations should exist. - event_ids = self._get_related_events() - relations = self._get_bundled_aggregations() - self.assertCountEqual(event_ids, [to_redact_event_id, unredacted_event_id]) - self.assertEquals( - relations["m.annotation"], - {"chunk": [{"type": "m.reaction", "key": "a", "count": 2}]}, - ) - - # Redact one of the reactions. - self._redact(to_redact_event_id) - - # The unredacted relation should still exist. - event_ids = self._get_related_events() - relations = self._get_bundled_aggregations() - self.assertEquals(event_ids, [unredacted_event_id]) - self.assertEquals( - relations["m.annotation"], - {"chunk": [{"type": "m.reaction", "key": "a", "count": 1}]}, - ) - def test_redact_relation_thread(self) -> None: """ Test that thread replies are properly handled after the thread reply redacted. @@ -1775,14 +1653,14 @@ class RelationRedactionTestCase(BaseRelationsTestCase): is redacted. """ # Add a relation - channel = self._send_relation(RelationTypes.ANNOTATION, "m.reaction", key="👍") + channel = self._send_relation(RelationTypes.REFERENCE, "org.matrix.test") related_event_id = channel.json_body["event_id"] # The relations should exist. event_ids = self._get_related_events() relations = self._get_bundled_aggregations() self.assertEqual(len(event_ids), 1) - self.assertIn(RelationTypes.ANNOTATION, relations) + self.assertIn(RelationTypes.REFERENCE, relations) # Redact the original event. self._redact(self.parent_id) @@ -1792,8 +1670,8 @@ class RelationRedactionTestCase(BaseRelationsTestCase): relations = self._get_bundled_aggregations() self.assertEquals(event_ids, [related_event_id]) self.assertEquals( - relations["m.annotation"], - {"chunk": [{"type": "m.reaction", "key": "👍", "count": 1}]}, + relations[RelationTypes.REFERENCE], + {"chunk": [{"event_id": related_event_id}]}, ) def test_redact_parent_thread(self) -> None: |