diff options
author | Eric Eastwood <erice@element.io> | 2022-11-18 17:05:41 -0600 |
---|---|---|
committer | Eric Eastwood <erice@element.io> | 2022-11-18 17:05:41 -0600 |
commit | 04de9ea73809670f4ce2cf0dc085065a324453e8 (patch) | |
tree | 95cb00be91df21d3002651b0835eca8ea88645e5 /tests/push | |
parent | Merge branch 'madlittlemods/11850-migrate-to-opentelemetry' into madlittlemod... (diff) | |
parent | Merge branch 'develop' into madlittlemods/11850-migrate-to-opentelemetry (diff) | |
download | synapse-madlittlemods/13356-messages-investigation-scratch-v1.tar.xz |
Merge branch 'madlittlemods/11850-migrate-to-opentelemetry' into madlittlemods/13356-messages-investigation-scratch-v1 github/madlittlemods/13356-messages-investigation-scratch-v1 madlittlemods/13356-messages-investigation-scratch-v1
Conflicts: synapse/handlers/federation.py synapse/handlers/relations.py
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/push')
-rw-r--r-- | tests/push/test_bulk_push_rule_evaluator.py | 74 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tests/push/test_push_rule_evaluator.py | 371 |
2 files changed, 368 insertions, 77 deletions
diff --git a/tests/push/test_bulk_push_rule_evaluator.py b/tests/push/test_bulk_push_rule_evaluator.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..594e7937a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/push/test_bulk_push_rule_evaluator.py @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ +from unittest.mock import patch + +from synapse.api.room_versions import RoomVersions +from synapse.push.bulk_push_rule_evaluator import BulkPushRuleEvaluator +from synapse.rest import admin +from synapse.rest.client import login, register, room +from synapse.types import create_requester + +from tests import unittest + + +class TestBulkPushRuleEvaluator(unittest.HomeserverTestCase): + + servlets = [ + admin.register_servlets_for_client_rest_resource, + room.register_servlets, + login.register_servlets, + register.register_servlets, + ] + + def test_action_for_event_by_user_handles_noninteger_power_levels(self) -> None: + """We should convert floats and strings to integers before passing to Rust. + + Reproduces #14060. + + A lack of validation: the gift that keeps on giving. + """ + # Create a new user and room. + alice = self.register_user("alice", "pass") + token = self.login(alice, "pass") + + room_id = self.helper.create_room_as( + alice, room_version=RoomVersions.V9.identifier, tok=token + ) + + # Alter the power levels in that room to include stringy and floaty levels. + # We need to suppress the validation logic or else it will reject these dodgy + # values. (Presumably this validation was not always present.) + event_creation_handler = self.hs.get_event_creation_handler() + requester = create_requester(alice) + with patch("synapse.events.validator.validate_canonicaljson"), patch( + "synapse.events.validator.jsonschema.validate" + ): + self.helper.send_state( + room_id, + "m.room.power_levels", + { + "users": {alice: "100"}, # stringy + "notifications": {"room": 100.0}, # float + }, + token, + state_key="", + ) + + # Create a new message event, and try to evaluate it under the dodgy + # power level event. + event, context = self.get_success( + event_creation_handler.create_event( + requester, + { + "type": "m.room.message", + "room_id": room_id, + "content": { + "msgtype": "m.text", + "body": "helo", + }, + "sender": alice, + }, + ) + ) + + bulk_evaluator = BulkPushRuleEvaluator(self.hs) + # should not raise + self.get_success(bulk_evaluator.action_for_events_by_user([(event, context)])) diff --git a/tests/push/test_push_rule_evaluator.py b/tests/push/test_push_rule_evaluator.py index 718f489577..fe7c145840 100644 --- a/tests/push/test_push_rule_evaluator.py +++ b/tests/push/test_push_rule_evaluator.py @@ -12,23 +12,25 @@ # See the License for the specific language governing permissions and # limitations under the License. -from typing import Dict, Optional, Set, Tuple, Union +from typing import Dict, Optional, Union import frozendict from twisted.test.proto_helpers import MemoryReactor import synapse.rest.admin -from synapse.api.constants import EventTypes, Membership +from synapse.api.constants import EventTypes, HistoryVisibility, Membership from synapse.api.room_versions import RoomVersions from synapse.appservice import ApplicationService from synapse.events import FrozenEvent -from synapse.push import push_rule_evaluator -from synapse.push.push_rule_evaluator import PushRuleEvaluatorForEvent +from synapse.push.bulk_push_rule_evaluator import _flatten_dict +from synapse.push.httppusher import tweaks_for_actions +from synapse.rest import admin from synapse.rest.client import login, register, room from synapse.server import HomeServer from synapse.storage.databases.main.appservice import _make_exclusive_regex -from synapse.types import JsonDict +from synapse.synapse_rust.push import PushRuleEvaluator +from synapse.types import JsonDict, UserID from synapse.util import Clock from tests import unittest @@ -37,11 +39,8 @@ from tests.test_utils.event_injection import create_event, inject_member_event class PushRuleEvaluatorTestCase(unittest.TestCase): def _get_evaluator( - self, - content: JsonDict, - relations: Optional[Dict[str, Set[Tuple[str, str]]]] = None, - relations_match_enabled: bool = False, - ) -> PushRuleEvaluatorForEvent: + self, content: JsonDict, related_events=None + ) -> PushRuleEvaluator: event = FrozenEvent( { "event_id": "$event_id", @@ -56,13 +55,13 @@ class PushRuleEvaluatorTestCase(unittest.TestCase): room_member_count = 0 sender_power_level = 0 power_levels: Dict[str, Union[int, Dict[str, int]]] = {} - return PushRuleEvaluatorForEvent( - event, + return PushRuleEvaluator( + _flatten_dict(event), room_member_count, sender_power_level, - power_levels, - relations or set(), - relations_match_enabled, + power_levels.get("notifications", {}), + {} if related_events is None else related_events, + True, ) def test_display_name(self) -> None: @@ -293,77 +292,218 @@ class PushRuleEvaluatorTestCase(unittest.TestCase): ] self.assertEqual( - push_rule_evaluator.tweaks_for_actions(actions), + tweaks_for_actions(actions), {"sound": "default", "highlight": True}, ) - def test_relation_match(self) -> None: - """Test the relation_match push rule kind.""" - - # Check if the experimental feature is disabled. + def test_related_event_match(self): evaluator = self._get_evaluator( - {}, {"m.annotation": {("@user:test", "m.reaction")}} + { + "m.relates_to": { + "event_id": "$parent_event_id", + "key": "😀", + "rel_type": "m.annotation", + "m.in_reply_to": { + "event_id": "$parent_event_id", + }, + } + }, + { + "m.in_reply_to": { + "event_id": "$parent_event_id", + "type": "m.room.message", + "sender": "@other_user:test", + "room_id": "!room:test", + "content.msgtype": "m.text", + "content.body": "Original message", + }, + "m.annotation": { + "event_id": "$parent_event_id", + "type": "m.room.message", + "sender": "@other_user:test", + "room_id": "!room:test", + "content.msgtype": "m.text", + "content.body": "Original message", + }, + }, + ) + self.assertTrue( + evaluator.matches( + { + "kind": "im.nheko.msc3664.related_event_match", + "key": "sender", + "rel_type": "m.in_reply_to", + "pattern": "@other_user:test", + }, + "@user:test", + "display_name", + ) + ) + self.assertFalse( + evaluator.matches( + { + "kind": "im.nheko.msc3664.related_event_match", + "key": "sender", + "rel_type": "m.in_reply_to", + "pattern": "@user:test", + }, + "@other_user:test", + "display_name", + ) + ) + self.assertTrue( + evaluator.matches( + { + "kind": "im.nheko.msc3664.related_event_match", + "key": "sender", + "rel_type": "m.annotation", + "pattern": "@other_user:test", + }, + "@other_user:test", + "display_name", + ) + ) + self.assertFalse( + evaluator.matches( + { + "kind": "im.nheko.msc3664.related_event_match", + "key": "sender", + "rel_type": "m.in_reply_to", + }, + "@user:test", + "display_name", + ) + ) + self.assertTrue( + evaluator.matches( + { + "kind": "im.nheko.msc3664.related_event_match", + "rel_type": "m.in_reply_to", + }, + "@user:test", + "display_name", + ) + ) + self.assertFalse( + evaluator.matches( + { + "kind": "im.nheko.msc3664.related_event_match", + "rel_type": "m.replace", + }, + "@other_user:test", + "display_name", + ) ) - condition = {"kind": "relation_match"} - # Oddly, an unknown condition always matches. - self.assertTrue(evaluator.matches(condition, "@user:test", "foo")) - # A push rule evaluator with the experimental rule enabled. + def test_related_event_match_with_fallback(self): evaluator = self._get_evaluator( - {}, {"m.annotation": {("@user:test", "m.reaction")}}, True + { + "m.relates_to": { + "event_id": "$parent_event_id", + "key": "😀", + "rel_type": "m.thread", + "is_falling_back": True, + "m.in_reply_to": { + "event_id": "$parent_event_id", + }, + } + }, + { + "m.in_reply_to": { + "event_id": "$parent_event_id", + "type": "m.room.message", + "sender": "@other_user:test", + "room_id": "!room:test", + "content.msgtype": "m.text", + "content.body": "Original message", + "im.vector.is_falling_back": "", + }, + "m.thread": { + "event_id": "$parent_event_id", + "type": "m.room.message", + "sender": "@other_user:test", + "room_id": "!room:test", + "content.msgtype": "m.text", + "content.body": "Original message", + }, + }, + ) + self.assertTrue( + evaluator.matches( + { + "kind": "im.nheko.msc3664.related_event_match", + "key": "sender", + "rel_type": "m.in_reply_to", + "pattern": "@other_user:test", + "include_fallbacks": True, + }, + "@user:test", + "display_name", + ) + ) + self.assertFalse( + evaluator.matches( + { + "kind": "im.nheko.msc3664.related_event_match", + "key": "sender", + "rel_type": "m.in_reply_to", + "pattern": "@other_user:test", + "include_fallbacks": False, + }, + "@user:test", + "display_name", + ) + ) + self.assertFalse( + evaluator.matches( + { + "kind": "im.nheko.msc3664.related_event_match", + "key": "sender", + "rel_type": "m.in_reply_to", + "pattern": "@other_user:test", + }, + "@user:test", + "display_name", + ) ) - # Check just relation type. - condition = { - "kind": "org.matrix.msc3772.relation_match", - "rel_type": "m.annotation", - } - self.assertTrue(evaluator.matches(condition, "@user:test", "foo")) - - # Check relation type and sender. - condition = { - "kind": "org.matrix.msc3772.relation_match", - "rel_type": "m.annotation", - "sender": "@user:test", - } - self.assertTrue(evaluator.matches(condition, "@user:test", "foo")) - condition = { - "kind": "org.matrix.msc3772.relation_match", - "rel_type": "m.annotation", - "sender": "@other:test", - } - self.assertFalse(evaluator.matches(condition, "@user:test", "foo")) - - # Check relation type and event type. - condition = { - "kind": "org.matrix.msc3772.relation_match", - "rel_type": "m.annotation", - "type": "m.reaction", - } - self.assertTrue(evaluator.matches(condition, "@user:test", "foo")) - - # Check just sender, this fails since rel_type is required. - condition = { - "kind": "org.matrix.msc3772.relation_match", - "sender": "@user:test", - } - self.assertFalse(evaluator.matches(condition, "@user:test", "foo")) - - # Check sender glob. - condition = { - "kind": "org.matrix.msc3772.relation_match", - "rel_type": "m.annotation", - "sender": "@*:test", - } - self.assertTrue(evaluator.matches(condition, "@user:test", "foo")) - - # Check event type glob. - condition = { - "kind": "org.matrix.msc3772.relation_match", - "rel_type": "m.annotation", - "event_type": "*.reaction", - } - self.assertTrue(evaluator.matches(condition, "@user:test", "foo")) + def test_related_event_match_no_related_event(self): + evaluator = self._get_evaluator( + {"msgtype": "m.text", "body": "Message without related event"} + ) + self.assertFalse( + evaluator.matches( + { + "kind": "im.nheko.msc3664.related_event_match", + "key": "sender", + "rel_type": "m.in_reply_to", + "pattern": "@other_user:test", + }, + "@user:test", + "display_name", + ) + ) + self.assertFalse( + evaluator.matches( + { + "kind": "im.nheko.msc3664.related_event_match", + "key": "sender", + "rel_type": "m.in_reply_to", + }, + "@user:test", + "display_name", + ) + ) + self.assertFalse( + evaluator.matches( + { + "kind": "im.nheko.msc3664.related_event_match", + "rel_type": "m.in_reply_to", + }, + "@user:test", + "display_name", + ) + ) class TestBulkPushRuleEvaluator(unittest.HomeserverTestCase): @@ -439,3 +579,80 @@ class TestBulkPushRuleEvaluator(unittest.HomeserverTestCase): ) self.assertEqual(len(users_with_push_actions), 0) + + +class BulkPushRuleEvaluatorTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase): + servlets = [ + admin.register_servlets, + login.register_servlets, + room.register_servlets, + ] + + def prepare( + self, reactor: MemoryReactor, clock: Clock, homeserver: HomeServer + ) -> None: + self.main_store = homeserver.get_datastores().main + + self.user_id1 = self.register_user("user1", "password") + self.tok1 = self.login(self.user_id1, "password") + self.user_id2 = self.register_user("user2", "password") + self.tok2 = self.login(self.user_id2, "password") + + self.room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(tok=self.tok1) + + # We want to test history visibility works correctly. + self.helper.send_state( + self.room_id, + EventTypes.RoomHistoryVisibility, + {"history_visibility": HistoryVisibility.JOINED}, + tok=self.tok1, + ) + + def get_notif_count(self, user_id: str) -> int: + return self.get_success( + self.main_store.db_pool.simple_select_one_onecol( + table="event_push_actions", + keyvalues={"user_id": user_id}, + retcol="COALESCE(SUM(notif), 0)", + desc="get_staging_notif_count", + ) + ) + + def test_plain_message(self) -> None: + """Test that sending a normal message in a room will trigger a + notification + """ + + # Have user2 join the room and cle + self.helper.join(self.room_id, self.user_id2, tok=self.tok2) + + # They start off with no notifications, but get them when messages are + # sent. + self.assertEqual(self.get_notif_count(self.user_id2), 0) + + user1 = UserID.from_string(self.user_id1) + self.create_and_send_event(self.room_id, user1) + + self.assertEqual(self.get_notif_count(self.user_id2), 1) + + def test_delayed_message(self) -> None: + """Test that a delayed message that was from before a user joined + doesn't cause a notification for the joined user. + """ + user1 = UserID.from_string(self.user_id1) + + # Send a message before user2 joins + event_id1 = self.create_and_send_event(self.room_id, user1) + + # Have user2 join the room + self.helper.join(self.room_id, self.user_id2, tok=self.tok2) + + # They start off with no notifications + self.assertEqual(self.get_notif_count(self.user_id2), 0) + + # Send another message that references the event before the join to + # simulate a "delayed" event + self.create_and_send_event(self.room_id, user1, prev_event_ids=[event_id1]) + + # user2 should not be notified about it, because they can't see it. + self.assertEqual(self.get_notif_count(self.user_id2), 0) |