summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/tests/handlers
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEric Eastwood <eric.eastwood@beta.gouv.fr>2024-06-06 14:44:32 -0500
committerGitHub <noreply@github.com>2024-06-06 14:44:32 -0500
commit4a7c58642c2eaedbf59faa2e368a0dc3bf09ceb4 (patch)
tree1108f1441c59c909130080d41de06dda78a5da66 /tests/handlers
parentHandle OTK uploads off master (#17271) (diff)
downloadsynapse-4a7c58642c2eaedbf59faa2e368a0dc3bf09ceb4.tar.xz
Add Sliding Sync `/sync` endpoint (initial implementation) (#17187)
Based on [MSC3575](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/3575): Sliding Sync

This iteration only focuses on returning the list of room IDs in the sliding window API (without sorting/filtering).

Rooms appear in the Sliding sync response based on:

 - `invite`, `join`, `knock`, `ban` membership events
 - Kicks (`leave` membership events where `sender` is different from the `user_id`/`state_key`)
 - `newly_left` (rooms that were left during the given token range, > `from_token` and <= `to_token`)
 - In order for bans/kicks to not show up, you need to `/forget` those rooms. This doesn't modify the event itself though and only adds the `forgotten` flag to `room_memberships` in Synapse. There isn't a way to tell when a room was forgotten at the moment so we can't factor it into the from/to range.

### Example request

`POST http://localhost:8008/_matrix/client/unstable/org.matrix.msc3575/sync`

```json
{
  "lists": {
    "foo-list": {
      "ranges": [ [0, 99] ],
      "sort": [ "by_notification_level", "by_recency", "by_name" ],
      "required_state": [
        ["m.room.join_rules", ""],
        ["m.room.history_visibility", ""],
        ["m.space.child", "*"]
      ],
      "timeline_limit": 100
    }
  }
}
```

Response:
```json
{
  "next_pos": "s58_224_0_13_10_1_1_16_0_1",
  "lists": {
    "foo-list": {
      "count": 1,
      "ops": [
        {
          "op": "SYNC",
          "range": [0, 99],
          "room_ids": [
            "!MmgikIyFzsuvtnbvVG:my.synapse.linux.server"
          ]
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "rooms": {},
  "extensions": {}
}
```
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/handlers')
-rw-r--r--tests/handlers/test_sliding_sync.py1118
1 files changed, 1118 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tests/handlers/test_sliding_sync.py b/tests/handlers/test_sliding_sync.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..5c27474b96
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/handlers/test_sliding_sync.py
@@ -0,0 +1,1118 @@
+#
+# This file is licensed under the Affero General Public License (AGPL) version 3.
+#
+# Copyright (C) 2024 New Vector, Ltd
+#
+# This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
+# it under the terms of the GNU Affero General Public License as
+# published by the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the
+# License, or (at your option) any later version.
+#
+# See the GNU Affero General Public License for more details:
+# <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.html>.
+#
+# Originally licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0:
+# <http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0>.
+#
+# [This file includes modifications made by New Vector Limited]
+#
+#
+import logging
+from unittest.mock import patch
+
+from twisted.test.proto_helpers import MemoryReactor
+
+from synapse.api.constants import EventTypes, JoinRules, Membership
+from synapse.api.room_versions import RoomVersions
+from synapse.rest import admin
+from synapse.rest.client import knock, login, room
+from synapse.server import HomeServer
+from synapse.storage.util.id_generators import MultiWriterIdGenerator
+from synapse.types import JsonDict, UserID
+from synapse.util import Clock
+
+from tests.replication._base import BaseMultiWorkerStreamTestCase
+from tests.unittest import HomeserverTestCase
+
+logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
+
+
+class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
+    """
+    Tests Sliding Sync handler `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` to make sure it returns
+    the correct list of rooms IDs.
+    """
+
+    servlets = [
+        admin.register_servlets,
+        knock.register_servlets,
+        login.register_servlets,
+        room.register_servlets,
+    ]
+
+    def default_config(self) -> JsonDict:
+        config = super().default_config()
+        # Enable sliding sync
+        config["experimental_features"] = {"msc3575_enabled": True}
+        return config
+
+    def prepare(self, reactor: MemoryReactor, clock: Clock, hs: HomeServer) -> None:
+        self.sliding_sync_handler = self.hs.get_sliding_sync_handler()
+        self.store = self.hs.get_datastores().main
+        self.event_sources = hs.get_event_sources()
+
+    def test_no_rooms(self) -> None:
+        """
+        Test when the user has never joined any rooms before
+        """
+        user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
+        # user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
+
+        now_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        room_id_results = self.get_success(
+            self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+                UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+                from_token=now_token,
+                to_token=now_token,
+            )
+        )
+
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, set())
+
+    def test_get_newly_joined_room(self) -> None:
+        """
+        Test that rooms that the user has newly_joined show up. newly_joined is when you
+        join after the `from_token` and <= `to_token`.
+        """
+        user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
+        user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
+
+        before_room_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok, is_public=True)
+
+        after_room_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        room_id_results = self.get_success(
+            self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+                UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+                from_token=before_room_token,
+                to_token=after_room_token,
+            )
+        )
+
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, {room_id})
+
+    def test_get_already_joined_room(self) -> None:
+        """
+        Test that rooms that the user is already joined show up.
+        """
+        user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
+        user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
+
+        room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok, is_public=True)
+
+        after_room_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        room_id_results = self.get_success(
+            self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+                UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+                from_token=after_room_token,
+                to_token=after_room_token,
+            )
+        )
+
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, {room_id})
+
+    def test_get_invited_banned_knocked_room(self) -> None:
+        """
+        Test that rooms that the user is invited to, banned from, and knocked on show
+        up.
+        """
+        user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
+        user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
+        user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
+        user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
+
+        before_room_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        # Setup the invited room (user2 invites user1 to the room)
+        invited_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
+        self.helper.invite(invited_room_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
+
+        # Setup the ban room (user2 bans user1 from the room)
+        ban_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
+            user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True
+        )
+        self.helper.join(ban_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        self.helper.ban(ban_room_id, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
+
+        # Setup the knock room (user1 knocks on the room)
+        knock_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
+            user2_id, tok=user2_tok, room_version=RoomVersions.V7.identifier
+        )
+        self.helper.send_state(
+            knock_room_id,
+            EventTypes.JoinRules,
+            {"join_rule": JoinRules.KNOCK},
+            tok=user2_tok,
+        )
+        # User1 knocks on the room
+        channel = self.make_request(
+            "POST",
+            "/_matrix/client/r0/knock/%s" % (knock_room_id,),
+            b"{}",
+            user1_tok,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200, channel.result)
+
+        after_room_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        room_id_results = self.get_success(
+            self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+                UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+                from_token=before_room_token,
+                to_token=after_room_token,
+            )
+        )
+
+        # Ensure that the invited, ban, and knock rooms show up
+        self.assertEqual(
+            room_id_results,
+            {
+                invited_room_id,
+                ban_room_id,
+                knock_room_id,
+            },
+        )
+
+    def test_get_kicked_room(self) -> None:
+        """
+        Test that a room that the user was kicked from still shows up. When the user
+        comes back to their client, they should see that they were kicked.
+        """
+        user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
+        user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
+        user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
+        user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
+
+        # Setup the kick room (user2 kicks user1 from the room)
+        kick_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
+            user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True
+        )
+        self.helper.join(kick_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        # Kick user1 from the room
+        self.helper.change_membership(
+            room=kick_room_id,
+            src=user2_id,
+            targ=user1_id,
+            tok=user2_tok,
+            membership=Membership.LEAVE,
+            extra_data={
+                "reason": "Bad manners",
+            },
+        )
+
+        after_kick_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        room_id_results = self.get_success(
+            self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+                UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+                from_token=after_kick_token,
+                to_token=after_kick_token,
+            )
+        )
+
+        # The kicked room should show up
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, {kick_room_id})
+
+    def test_forgotten_rooms(self) -> None:
+        """
+        Forgotten rooms do not show up even if we forget after the from/to range.
+
+        Ideally, we would be able to track when the `/forget` happens and apply it
+        accordingly in the token range but the forgotten flag is only an extra bool in
+        the `room_memberships` table.
+        """
+        user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
+        user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
+        user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
+        user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
+
+        # Setup a normal room that we leave. This won't show up in the sync response
+        # because we left it before our token but is good to check anyway.
+        leave_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
+            user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True
+        )
+        self.helper.join(leave_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        self.helper.leave(leave_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        # Setup the ban room (user2 bans user1 from the room)
+        ban_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
+            user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True
+        )
+        self.helper.join(ban_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        self.helper.ban(ban_room_id, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
+
+        # Setup the kick room (user2 kicks user1 from the room)
+        kick_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
+            user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True
+        )
+        self.helper.join(kick_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        # Kick user1 from the room
+        self.helper.change_membership(
+            room=kick_room_id,
+            src=user2_id,
+            targ=user1_id,
+            tok=user2_tok,
+            membership=Membership.LEAVE,
+            extra_data={
+                "reason": "Bad manners",
+            },
+        )
+
+        before_room_forgets = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        # Forget the room after we already have our tokens. This doesn't change
+        # the membership event itself but will mark it internally in Synapse
+        channel = self.make_request(
+            "POST",
+            f"/_matrix/client/r0/rooms/{leave_room_id}/forget",
+            content={},
+            access_token=user1_tok,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200, channel.result)
+        channel = self.make_request(
+            "POST",
+            f"/_matrix/client/r0/rooms/{ban_room_id}/forget",
+            content={},
+            access_token=user1_tok,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200, channel.result)
+        channel = self.make_request(
+            "POST",
+            f"/_matrix/client/r0/rooms/{kick_room_id}/forget",
+            content={},
+            access_token=user1_tok,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200, channel.result)
+
+        room_id_results = self.get_success(
+            self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+                UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+                from_token=before_room_forgets,
+                to_token=before_room_forgets,
+            )
+        )
+
+        # We shouldn't see the room because it was forgotten
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, set())
+
+    def test_only_newly_left_rooms_show_up(self) -> None:
+        """
+        Test that newly_left rooms still show up in the sync response but rooms that
+        were left before the `from_token` don't show up. See condition "2)" comments in
+        the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user` method.
+        """
+        user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
+        user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
+
+        # Leave before we calculate the `from_token`
+        room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        # Leave during the from_token/to_token range (newly_left)
+        room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        after_room2_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        room_id_results = self.get_success(
+            self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+                UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+                from_token=after_room1_token,
+                to_token=after_room2_token,
+            )
+        )
+
+        # Only the newly_left room should show up
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, {room_id2})
+
+    def test_no_joins_after_to_token(self) -> None:
+        """
+        Rooms we join after the `to_token` should *not* show up. See condition "1b)"
+        comments in the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
+        """
+        user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
+        user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
+
+        before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        # Room join after after our `to_token` shouldn't show up
+        room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        _ = room_id2
+
+        room_id_results = self.get_success(
+            self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+                UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+                from_token=before_room1_token,
+                to_token=after_room1_token,
+            )
+        )
+
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, {room_id1})
+
+    def test_join_during_range_and_left_room_after_to_token(self) -> None:
+        """
+        Room still shows up if we left the room but were joined during the
+        from_token/to_token. See condition "1a)" comments in the
+        `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
+        """
+        user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
+        user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
+
+        before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        # Leave the room after we already have our tokens
+        self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        room_id_results = self.get_success(
+            self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+                UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+                from_token=before_room1_token,
+                to_token=after_room1_token,
+            )
+        )
+
+        # We should still see the room because we were joined during the
+        # from_token/to_token time period.
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, {room_id1})
+
+    def test_join_before_range_and_left_room_after_to_token(self) -> None:
+        """
+        Room still shows up if we left the room but were joined before the `from_token`
+        so it should show up. See condition "1a)" comments in the
+        `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
+        """
+        user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
+        user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
+
+        room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        # Leave the room after we already have our tokens
+        self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        room_id_results = self.get_success(
+            self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+                UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+                from_token=after_room1_token,
+                to_token=after_room1_token,
+            )
+        )
+
+        # We should still see the room because we were joined before the `from_token`
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, {room_id1})
+
+    def test_kicked_before_range_and_left_after_to_token(self) -> None:
+        """
+        Room still shows up if we left the room but were kicked before the `from_token`
+        so it should show up. See condition "1a)" comments in the
+        `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
+        """
+        user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
+        user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
+        user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
+        user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
+
+        # Setup the kick room (user2 kicks user1 from the room)
+        kick_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
+            user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True
+        )
+        self.helper.join(kick_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        # Kick user1 from the room
+        self.helper.change_membership(
+            room=kick_room_id,
+            src=user2_id,
+            targ=user1_id,
+            tok=user2_tok,
+            membership=Membership.LEAVE,
+            extra_data={
+                "reason": "Bad manners",
+            },
+        )
+
+        after_kick_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        # Leave the room after we already have our tokens
+        #
+        # We have to join before we can leave (leave -> leave isn't a valid transition
+        # or at least it doesn't work in Synapse, 403 forbidden)
+        self.helper.join(kick_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        self.helper.leave(kick_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        room_id_results = self.get_success(
+            self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+                UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+                from_token=after_kick_token,
+                to_token=after_kick_token,
+            )
+        )
+
+        # We shouldn't see the room because it was forgotten
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, {kick_room_id})
+
+    def test_newly_left_during_range_and_join_leave_after_to_token(self) -> None:
+        """
+        Newly left room should show up. But we're also testing that joining and leaving
+        after the `to_token` doesn't mess with the results. See condition "2)" and "1a)"
+        comments in the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
+        """
+        user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
+        user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
+        user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
+        user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
+
+        before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        # We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
+        # leave and can still re-join.
+        room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
+        # Join and leave the room during the from/to range
+        self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        # Join and leave the room after we already have our tokens
+        self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        room_id_results = self.get_success(
+            self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+                UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+                from_token=before_room1_token,
+                to_token=after_room1_token,
+            )
+        )
+
+        # Room should still show up because it's newly_left during the from/to range
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, {room_id1})
+
+    def test_newly_left_during_range_and_join_after_to_token(self) -> None:
+        """
+        Newly left room should show up. But we're also testing that joining after the
+        `to_token` doesn't mess with the results. See condition "2)" and "1b)" comments
+        in the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
+        """
+        user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
+        user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
+        user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
+        user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
+
+        before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        # We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
+        # leave and can still re-join.
+        room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
+        # Join and leave the room during the from/to range
+        self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        # Join the room after we already have our tokens
+        self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        room_id_results = self.get_success(
+            self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+                UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+                from_token=before_room1_token,
+                to_token=after_room1_token,
+            )
+        )
+
+        # Room should still show up because it's newly_left during the from/to range
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, {room_id1})
+
+    def test_no_from_token(self) -> None:
+        """
+        Test that if we don't provide a `from_token`, we get all the rooms that we we're
+        joined to up to the `to_token`.
+
+        Providing `from_token` only really has the effect that it adds `newly_left`
+        rooms to the response.
+        """
+        user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
+        user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
+        user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
+        user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
+
+        # We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
+        # leave and can still re-join.
+        room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
+        room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
+
+        # Join room1
+        self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        # Join and leave the room2 before the `to_token`
+        self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        self.helper.leave(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        # Join the room2 after we already have our tokens
+        self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        room_id_results = self.get_success(
+            self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+                UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+                from_token=None,
+                to_token=after_room1_token,
+            )
+        )
+
+        # Only rooms we were joined to before the `to_token` should show up
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, {room_id1})
+
+    def test_from_token_ahead_of_to_token(self) -> None:
+        """
+        Test when the provided `from_token` comes after the `to_token`. We should
+        basically expect the same result as having no `from_token`.
+        """
+        user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
+        user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
+        user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
+        user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
+
+        # We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
+        # leave and can still re-join.
+        room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
+        room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
+        room_id3 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
+        room_id4 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
+
+        # Join room1 before `before_room_token`
+        self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        # Join and leave the room2 before `before_room_token`
+        self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        self.helper.leave(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        # Note: These are purposely swapped. The `from_token` should come after
+        # the `to_token` in this test
+        to_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        # Join room2 after `before_room_token`
+        self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        # --------
+
+        # Join room3 after `before_room_token`
+        self.helper.join(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        # Join and leave the room4 after `before_room_token`
+        self.helper.join(room_id4, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        self.helper.leave(room_id4, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        # Note: These are purposely swapped. The `from_token` should come after the
+        # `to_token` in this test
+        from_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        # Join the room4 after we already have our tokens
+        self.helper.join(room_id4, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        room_id_results = self.get_success(
+            self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+                UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+                from_token=from_token,
+                to_token=to_token,
+            )
+        )
+
+        # Only rooms we were joined to before the `to_token` should show up
+        #
+        # There won't be any newly_left rooms because the `from_token` is ahead of the
+        # `to_token` and that range will give no membership changes to check.
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, {room_id1})
+
+    def test_leave_before_range_and_join_leave_after_to_token(self) -> None:
+        """
+        Old left room shouldn't show up. But we're also testing that joining and leaving
+        after the `to_token` doesn't mess with the results. See condition "1a)" comments
+        in the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
+        """
+        user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
+        user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
+        user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
+        user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
+
+        # We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
+        # leave and can still re-join.
+        room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
+        # Join and leave the room before the from/to range
+        self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        # Join and leave the room after we already have our tokens
+        self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        room_id_results = self.get_success(
+            self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+                UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+                from_token=after_room1_token,
+                to_token=after_room1_token,
+            )
+        )
+
+        # Room shouldn't show up because it was left before the `from_token`
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, set())
+
+    def test_leave_before_range_and_join_after_to_token(self) -> None:
+        """
+        Old left room shouldn't show up. But we're also testing that joining after the
+        `to_token` doesn't mess with the results. See condition "1b)" comments in the
+        `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
+        """
+        user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
+        user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
+        user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
+        user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
+
+        # We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
+        # leave and can still re-join.
+        room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
+        # Join and leave the room before the from/to range
+        self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        # Join the room after we already have our tokens
+        self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        room_id_results = self.get_success(
+            self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+                UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+                from_token=after_room1_token,
+                to_token=after_room1_token,
+            )
+        )
+
+        # Room shouldn't show up because it was left before the `from_token`
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, set())
+
+    def test_join_leave_multiple_times_during_range_and_after_to_token(
+        self,
+    ) -> None:
+        """
+        Join and leave multiple times shouldn't affect rooms from showing up. It just
+        matters that we were joined or newly_left in the from/to range. But we're also
+        testing that joining and leaving after the `to_token` doesn't mess with the
+        results.
+        """
+        user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
+        user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
+        user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
+        user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
+
+        before_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        # We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
+        # leave and can still re-join.
+        room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
+        # Join, leave, join back to the room before the from/to range
+        self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        # Leave and Join the room multiple times after we already have our tokens
+        self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        room_id_results = self.get_success(
+            self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+                UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+                from_token=before_room1_token,
+                to_token=after_room1_token,
+            )
+        )
+
+        # Room should show up because it was newly_left and joined during the from/to range
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, {room_id1})
+
+    def test_join_leave_multiple_times_before_range_and_after_to_token(
+        self,
+    ) -> None:
+        """
+        Join and leave multiple times before the from/to range shouldn't affect rooms
+        from showing up. It just matters that we were joined or newly_left in the
+        from/to range. But we're also testing that joining and leaving after the
+        `to_token` doesn't mess with the results.
+        """
+        user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
+        user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
+        user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
+        user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
+
+        # We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
+        # leave and can still re-join.
+        room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
+        # Join, leave, join back to the room before the from/to range
+        self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        # Leave and Join the room multiple times after we already have our tokens
+        self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        room_id_results = self.get_success(
+            self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+                UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+                from_token=after_room1_token,
+                to_token=after_room1_token,
+            )
+        )
+
+        # Room should show up because we were joined before the from/to range
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, {room_id1})
+
+    def test_invite_before_range_and_join_leave_after_to_token(
+        self,
+    ) -> None:
+        """
+        Make it look like we joined after the token range but we were invited before the
+        from/to range so the room should still show up. See condition "1a)" comments in
+        the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
+        """
+        user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
+        user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
+        user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
+        user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
+
+        # We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
+        # leave and can still re-join.
+        room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
+
+        # Invited to the room before the token
+        self.helper.invite(room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
+
+        after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        # Join and leave the room after we already have our tokens
+        self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        room_id_results = self.get_success(
+            self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+                UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+                from_token=after_room1_token,
+                to_token=after_room1_token,
+            )
+        )
+
+        # Room should show up because we were invited before the from/to range
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, {room_id1})
+
+    def test_multiple_rooms_are_not_confused(
+        self,
+    ) -> None:
+        """
+        Test that multiple rooms are not confused as we fixup the list. This test is
+        spawning from a real world bug in the code where I was accidentally using
+        `event.room_id` in one of the fix-up loops but the `event` being referenced was
+        actually from a different loop.
+        """
+        user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
+        user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
+        user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
+        user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
+
+        # We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
+        # leave and can still re-join.
+        room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
+        room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
+
+        # Invited and left the room before the token
+        self.helper.invite(room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
+        self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        # Invited to room2
+        self.helper.invite(room_id2, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
+
+        before_room3_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        # Invited and left room3 during the from/to range
+        room_id3 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
+        self.helper.invite(room_id3, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
+        self.helper.leave(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        after_room3_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        # Join and leave the room after we already have our tokens
+        self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        # Leave room2
+        self.helper.leave(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        # Leave room3
+        self.helper.leave(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        room_id_results = self.get_success(
+            self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+                UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+                from_token=before_room3_token,
+                to_token=after_room3_token,
+            )
+        )
+
+        self.assertEqual(
+            room_id_results,
+            {
+                # `room_id1` shouldn't show up because we left before the from/to range
+                #
+                # Room should show up because we were invited before the from/to range
+                room_id2,
+                # Room should show up because it was newly_left during the from/to range
+                room_id3,
+            },
+        )
+
+
+class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserEventShardTestCase(BaseMultiWorkerStreamTestCase):
+    """
+    Tests Sliding Sync handler `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` to make sure it works with
+    sharded event stream_writers enabled
+    """
+
+    servlets = [
+        admin.register_servlets_for_client_rest_resource,
+        room.register_servlets,
+        login.register_servlets,
+    ]
+
+    def default_config(self) -> dict:
+        config = super().default_config()
+        # Enable sliding sync
+        config["experimental_features"] = {"msc3575_enabled": True}
+
+        # Enable shared event stream_writers
+        config["stream_writers"] = {"events": ["worker1", "worker2", "worker3"]}
+        config["instance_map"] = {
+            "main": {"host": "testserv", "port": 8765},
+            "worker1": {"host": "testserv", "port": 1001},
+            "worker2": {"host": "testserv", "port": 1002},
+            "worker3": {"host": "testserv", "port": 1003},
+        }
+        return config
+
+    def prepare(self, reactor: MemoryReactor, clock: Clock, hs: HomeServer) -> None:
+        self.sliding_sync_handler = self.hs.get_sliding_sync_handler()
+        self.store = self.hs.get_datastores().main
+        self.event_sources = hs.get_event_sources()
+
+    def _create_room(self, room_id: str, user_id: str, tok: str) -> None:
+        """
+        Create a room with a specific room_id. We use this so that that we have a
+        consistent room_id across test runs that hashes to the same value and will be
+        sharded to a known worker in the tests.
+        """
+
+        # We control the room ID generation by patching out the
+        # `_generate_room_id` method
+        with patch(
+            "synapse.handlers.room.RoomCreationHandler._generate_room_id"
+        ) as mock:
+            mock.side_effect = lambda: room_id
+            self.helper.create_room_as(user_id, tok=tok)
+
+    def test_sharded_event_persisters(self) -> None:
+        """
+        This test should catch bugs that would come from flawed stream position
+        (`stream_ordering`) comparisons or making `RoomStreamToken`'s naively. To
+        compare event positions properly, you need to consider both the `instance_name`
+        and `stream_ordering` together.
+
+        The test creates three event persister workers and a room that is sharded to
+        each worker. On worker2, we make the event stream position stuck so that it lags
+        behind the other workers and we start getting `RoomStreamToken` that have an
+        `instance_map` component (i.e. q`m{min_pos}~{writer1}.{pos1}~{writer2}.{pos2}`).
+
+        We then send some events to advance the stream positions of worker1 and worker3
+        but worker2 is lagging behind because it's stuck. We are specifically testing
+        that `get_sync_room_ids_for_user(from_token=xxx, to_token=xxx)` should work
+        correctly in these adverse conditions.
+        """
+        user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
+        user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
+        user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
+        user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
+
+        self.make_worker_hs(
+            "synapse.app.generic_worker",
+            {"worker_name": "worker1"},
+        )
+
+        worker_hs2 = self.make_worker_hs(
+            "synapse.app.generic_worker",
+            {"worker_name": "worker2"},
+        )
+
+        self.make_worker_hs(
+            "synapse.app.generic_worker",
+            {"worker_name": "worker3"},
+        )
+
+        # Specially crafted room IDs that get persisted on different workers.
+        #
+        # Sharded to worker1
+        room_id1 = "!fooo:test"
+        # Sharded to worker2
+        room_id2 = "!bar:test"
+        # Sharded to worker3
+        room_id3 = "!quux:test"
+
+        # Create rooms on the different workers.
+        self._create_room(room_id1, user2_id, user2_tok)
+        self._create_room(room_id2, user2_id, user2_tok)
+        self._create_room(room_id3, user2_id, user2_tok)
+        join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        join_response2 = self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        # Leave room2
+        self.helper.leave(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        join_response3 = self.helper.join(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        # Leave room3
+        self.helper.leave(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        # Ensure that the events were sharded to different workers.
+        pos1 = self.get_success(
+            self.store.get_position_for_event(join_response1["event_id"])
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(pos1.instance_name, "worker1")
+        pos2 = self.get_success(
+            self.store.get_position_for_event(join_response2["event_id"])
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(pos2.instance_name, "worker2")
+        pos3 = self.get_success(
+            self.store.get_position_for_event(join_response3["event_id"])
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(pos3.instance_name, "worker3")
+
+        before_stuck_activity_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        # We now gut wrench into the events stream `MultiWriterIdGenerator` on worker2 to
+        # mimic it getting stuck persisting an event. This ensures that when we send an
+        # event on worker1/worker3 we end up in a state where worker2 events stream
+        # position lags that on worker1/worker3, resulting in a RoomStreamToken with a
+        # non-empty `instance_map` component.
+        #
+        # Worker2's event stream position will not advance until we call `__aexit__`
+        # again.
+        worker_store2 = worker_hs2.get_datastores().main
+        assert isinstance(worker_store2._stream_id_gen, MultiWriterIdGenerator)
+        actx = worker_store2._stream_id_gen.get_next()
+        self.get_success(actx.__aenter__())
+
+        # For room_id1/worker1: leave and join the room to advance the stream position
+        # and generate membership changes.
+        self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        # For room_id2/worker2: which is currently stuck, join the room.
+        join_on_worker2_response = self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        # For room_id3/worker3: leave and join the room to advance the stream position
+        # and generate membership changes.
+        self.helper.leave(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        join_on_worker3_response = self.helper.join(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        # Get a token while things are stuck after our activity
+        stuck_activity_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+        logger.info("stuck_activity_token %s", stuck_activity_token)
+        # Let's make sure we're working with a token that has an `instance_map`
+        self.assertNotEqual(len(stuck_activity_token.room_key.instance_map), 0)
+
+        # Just double check that the join event on worker2 (that is stuck) happened
+        # after the position recorded for worker2 in the token but before the max
+        # position in the token. This is crucial for the behavior we're trying to test.
+        join_on_worker2_pos = self.get_success(
+            self.store.get_position_for_event(join_on_worker2_response["event_id"])
+        )
+        logger.info("join_on_worker2_pos %s", join_on_worker2_pos)
+        # Ensure the join technially came after our token
+        self.assertGreater(
+            join_on_worker2_pos.stream,
+            stuck_activity_token.room_key.get_stream_pos_for_instance("worker2"),
+        )
+        # But less than the max stream position of some other worker
+        self.assertLess(
+            join_on_worker2_pos.stream,
+            # max
+            stuck_activity_token.room_key.get_max_stream_pos(),
+        )
+
+        # Just double check that the join event on worker3 happened after the min stream
+        # value in the token but still within the position recorded for worker3. This is
+        # crucial for the behavior we're trying to test.
+        join_on_worker3_pos = self.get_success(
+            self.store.get_position_for_event(join_on_worker3_response["event_id"])
+        )
+        logger.info("join_on_worker3_pos %s", join_on_worker3_pos)
+        # Ensure the join came after the min but still encapsulated by the token
+        self.assertGreaterEqual(
+            join_on_worker3_pos.stream,
+            # min
+            stuck_activity_token.room_key.stream,
+        )
+        self.assertLessEqual(
+            join_on_worker3_pos.stream,
+            stuck_activity_token.room_key.get_stream_pos_for_instance("worker3"),
+        )
+
+        # We finish the fake persisting an event we started above and advance worker2's
+        # event stream position (unstuck worker2).
+        self.get_success(actx.__aexit__(None, None, None))
+
+        # The function under test
+        room_id_results = self.get_success(
+            self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+                UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+                from_token=before_stuck_activity_token,
+                to_token=stuck_activity_token,
+            )
+        )
+
+        self.assertEqual(
+            room_id_results,
+            {
+                room_id1,
+                # room_id2 shouldn't show up because we left before the from/to range
+                # and the join event during the range happened while worker2 was stuck.
+                # This means that from the perspective of the master, where the
+                # `stuck_activity_token` is generated, the stream position for worker2
+                # wasn't advanced to the join yet. Looking at the `instance_map`, the
+                # join technically comes after `stuck_activity_token``.
+                #
+                # room_id2,
+                room_id3,
+            },
+        )