diff options
author | Richard van der Hoff <richard@matrix.org> | 2017-03-17 20:56:54 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Richard van der Hoff <richard@matrix.org> | 2017-03-18 00:07:43 +0000 |
commit | f40c2db05ae5e76428c97f1e194fe7d843913054 (patch) | |
tree | 39eb9fd6de50eb4493e336c93c1237a7ba31cd88 /synapse | |
parent | Run the reactor with the sentinel logcontext (diff) | |
download | synapse-f40c2db05ae5e76428c97f1e194fe7d843913054.tar.xz |
Stop preserve_fn leaking context into the reactor
Fix a bug in ``logcontext.preserve_fn`` which made it leak context into the reactor, and add a test for it. Also, get rid of ``logcontext.reset_context_after_deferred``, which tried to do the same thing but had its own, different, set of bugs.
Diffstat (limited to 'synapse')
-rw-r--r-- | synapse/handlers/federation.py | 5 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | synapse/util/logcontext.py | 61 |
2 files changed, 32 insertions, 34 deletions
diff --git a/synapse/handlers/federation.py b/synapse/handlers/federation.py index 0cd5501b05..6157204924 100644 --- a/synapse/handlers/federation.py +++ b/synapse/handlers/federation.py @@ -933,8 +933,9 @@ class FederationHandler(BaseHandler): # lots of requests for missing prev_events which we do actually # have. Hence we fire off the deferred, but don't wait for it. - synapse.util.logcontext.reset_context_after_deferred( - self._handle_queued_pdus(room_queue)) + synapse.util.logcontext.preserve_fn(self._handle_queued_pdus)( + room_queue + ) defer.returnValue(True) diff --git a/synapse/util/logcontext.py b/synapse/util/logcontext.py index d73670f9f2..7cbe390b15 100644 --- a/synapse/util/logcontext.py +++ b/synapse/util/logcontext.py @@ -308,47 +308,44 @@ def preserve_context_over_deferred(deferred, context=None): return d -def reset_context_after_deferred(deferred): - """If the deferred is incomplete, add a callback which will reset the - context. - - This is useful when you want to fire off a deferred, but don't want to - wait for it to complete. (The deferred will restore the current log context - when it completes, so if you don't do anything, it will leak log context.) - - (If this feels asymmetric, consider it this way: we are effectively forking - a new thread of execution. We are probably currently within a - ``with LoggingContext()`` block, which is supposed to have a single entry - and exit point. But by spawning off another deferred, we are effectively - adding a new exit point.) +def preserve_fn(f): + """Wraps a function, to ensure that the current context is restored after + return from the function, and that the sentinel context is set once the + deferred returned by the funtion completes. - Args: - deferred (defer.Deferred): deferred + Useful for wrapping functions that return a deferred which you don't yield + on. """ def reset_context(result): LoggingContext.set_current_context(LoggingContext.sentinel) return result - if not deferred.called: - deferred.addBoth(reset_context) - - -def preserve_fn(f): - """Ensures that function is called with correct context and that context is - restored after return. Useful for wrapping functions that return a deferred - which you don't yield on. - """ + # XXX: why is this here rather than inside g? surely we want to preserve + # the context from the time the function was called, not when it was + # wrapped? current = LoggingContext.current_context() def g(*args, **kwargs): - with PreserveLoggingContext(current): - res = f(*args, **kwargs) - if isinstance(res, defer.Deferred): - return preserve_context_over_deferred( - res, context=LoggingContext.sentinel - ) - else: - return res + res = f(*args, **kwargs) + if isinstance(res, defer.Deferred) and not res.called: + # The function will have reset the context before returning, so + # we need to restore it now. + LoggingContext.set_current_context(current) + + # The original context will be restored when the deferred + # completes, but there is nothing waiting for it, so it will + # get leaked into the reactor or some other function which + # wasn't expecting it. We therefore need to reset the context + # here. + # + # (If this feels asymmetric, consider it this way: we are + # effectively forking a new thread of execution. We are + # probably currently within a ``with LoggingContext()`` block, + # which is supposed to have a single entry and exit point. But + # by spawning off another deferred, we are effectively + # adding a new exit point.) + res.addBoth(reset_context) + return res return g |