diff options
author | Mark Haines <mark.haines@matrix.org> | 2016-04-12 15:06:09 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Mark Haines <mark.haines@matrix.org> | 2016-04-12 15:14:10 +0100 |
commit | aa5ce4d4507e2848d8cd0eb917a23be2652db047 (patch) | |
tree | cb9d7d258b5ebace612f47edd7c2d4586f49437a /docs/replication.rst | |
parent | Merge pull request #716 from matrix-org/dbkr/get_pushers (diff) | |
download | synapse-aa5ce4d4507e2848d8cd0eb917a23be2652db047.tar.xz |
Add some design documentation for replication
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/replication.rst')
-rw-r--r-- | docs/replication.rst | 58 |
1 files changed, 58 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/replication.rst b/docs/replication.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..ccefe0a31a --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/replication.rst @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +Replication Architecture +======================== + +Motivation +---------- + +We'd like to be able to split some of the work that synapse does into multiple +python processes. In theory multiple synapse processes could share a single +postgresql database and we'd scale up by running more synapse processes. +However much of synapse assumes that only one process is interacting with the +database, both for assigning unique identifiers when inserting into tables, +notifying components about new updates, and for invalidating its caches. + +So running multiple copies of the current code isn't an option. One way to +run multiple processes would be to have a single writer process and multiple +reader processes connected to the same database. In order to do this we'd need +a way for the reader process to invalidate its in-memory caches when an update +happens on the writer. One way to do this is for the writer to present an +append-only log of updates which the readers can consume to invalidate their +caches and to push updates to listening clients or pushers. + +Synapse already stores much of its data as an append-only log so that it can +correctly respond to /sync requests so the amount of code changes needed to +expose the append-only log to the readers should be fairly minimal. + +Architecture +------------ + +The Replication API +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +Synapse will optionally expose a long poll HTTP API for extracting updates. The +API will have a similar shape to /sync in that clients provide tokens +indicating where in the log they have reached and a timeout. The synapse server +then either responds with updates immediately if it already has updates or it +waits until the timeout for more updates. If the timeout expires and nothing +happened then the server returns an empty response. + +However until the /sync API this replication API is returning synapse specific +data rather than trying to implement a matrix specification. The replication +results are returned as arrays of rows where the rows are mostly lifted +directly from the database. This avoids unnecessary JSON parsing on the server +and hopefully avoids an impedance mismatch between the data returned and the +required updates to the datastore. + +This does not replicate all the database tables as many of the database tables +are indexes that can be recovered from the contents of other tables. + +The format and parameters for the api are documented in +``synapse/replication/resource.py``. + + +The Slaved DataStore +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +There are read-only version of the synapse storage layer in +``synapse/replication/slave/storage`` that use the response of the replication +API to invalidate their caches. |