diff options
author | Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com> | 2019-02-05 18:11:26 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2019-02-05 18:11:26 +0000 |
commit | 39bf0ea2e860948adcd47f0f9cf8ff73b8abf841 (patch) | |
tree | b1deb3aa75023d905bc7a54663142c1704a95a1a | |
parent | fix some thinkos in UPGRADE.rst (diff) | |
download | synapse-39bf0ea2e860948adcd47f0f9cf8ff73b8abf841.tar.xz |
Add notes on SRV and .well-known (#4573)
-rw-r--r-- | docs/MSC1711_certificates_FAQ.md | 158 |
1 files changed, 117 insertions, 41 deletions
diff --git a/docs/MSC1711_certificates_FAQ.md b/docs/MSC1711_certificates_FAQ.md index 0dcef57733..efe6330647 100644 --- a/docs/MSC1711_certificates_FAQ.md +++ b/docs/MSC1711_certificates_FAQ.md @@ -19,19 +19,9 @@ certificate.** Admins will have 1 month to do so, after which 1.0.0 will be released and those servers without a valid certificate will not longer be able to federate with >= 1.0.0 servers. -If you are unable to generate a valid TLS certificate for your server (e.g. -because you run it on behalf of someone who doesn't want to give you a TLS -certificate for their domain, or simply because the matrix domain is hosted on -a different server), then you can now create a /.well-known/matrix/server file -on the matrix domain in order to delegate Matrix hosting to another domain. - Admins who currently use SRV records to delegate a domain **which they do not -control TLS for** will need to switch to using .well-known/matrix/server - though -they should retain their SRV record while the federation upgrades over the -course of the month. Other SRV records are unaffected. - -Full upgrade notes can be found in -[UPGRADE.rst](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/blob/master/UPGRADE.rst). -What follows is a timeline and some frequently asked questions. +Full details on how to carry out this configuration change is given +[below](#configuring-certificates-for-compatibility-with-synapse-100). A +timeline and some frequently asked questions are also given below. For more details and context on the release of the r0.1 Server/Server API and imminent Matrix 1.0 release, you can also see our @@ -39,25 +29,26 @@ imminent Matrix 1.0 release, you can also see our ## Contents * Timeline -* Synapse 0.99.0 has just been released, what do I need to do right now? -* How do I upgrade? -* What will happen if I do not set up a valid federation certificate - immediately? -* What will happen if I do nothing at all? -* When do I need a SRV record or .well-known URI? -* Can I still use an SRV record? -* I have created a .well-known URI. Do I still need an SRV record? -* It used to work just fine, why are you breaking everything? -* Can I manage my own certificates rather than having Synapse renew - certificates itself? -* Do you still recommend against using a reverse-proxy on the federation port? -* Do I still need to give my TLS certificates to Synapse if I am using a - reverse-proxy? -* Do I need the same certificate for the client and federation port? -* How do I tell Synapse to reload my keys/certificates after I replace them? - - -### Timeline +* Configuring certificates for compatibility with Synapse 1.0 +* FAQ + * Synapse 0.99.0 has just been released, what do I need to do right now? + * How do I upgrade? + * What will happen if I do not set up a valid federation certificate + immediately? + * What will happen if I do nothing at all? + * When do I need a SRV record or .well-known URI? + * Can I still use an SRV record? + * I have created a .well-known URI. Do I still need an SRV record? + * It used to work just fine, why are you breaking everything? + * Can I manage my own certificates rather than having Synapse renew + certificates itself? + * Do you still recommend against using a reverse-proxy on the federation port? + * Do I still need to give my TLS certificates to Synapse if I am using a + reverse-proxy? + * Do I need the same certificate for the client and federation port? + * How do I tell Synapse to reload my keys/certificates after I replace them? + +## Timeline **5th Feb 2019 - Synapse 0.99.0 is released.** @@ -82,10 +73,96 @@ alongside their .well-known record. 1.0.0 will land no sooner than 1 month after 0.99.0, leaving server admins one month after 5th February to upgrade to 0.99.0 and deploy their certificates. In accordance with the the [S2S spec](https://matrix.org/docs/spec/server_server/r0.1.0.html) -1.0.0 will enforce federation checks. This means that any homeserver without a +1.0.0 will enforce certificate validity. This means that any homeserver without a valid certificate after this point will no longer be able to federate with 1.0.0 servers. + +## Configuring certificates for compatibility with Synapse 1.0.0 + +### If you do not currently have an SRV record + +In this case, your `server_name` points to the host where your Synapse is +running. There is no need to create a `.well-known` URI or an SRV record, but +you will need to give Synapse a valid, signed, certificate. + +The easiest way to do that is with Synapse's built-in ACME (Let's Encrypt) +support. Full details are in [ACME.md](./ACME.md) but, in a nutshell: + + 1. Allow Synapse to listen on port 80 with `authbind`, or forward it from a + reverse proxy. + 2. Enable acme support in `homeserver.yaml`. + 3. Move your old certificates out of the way. + 4. Restart Synapse. + +### If you do have an SRV record currently + +If you are using an SRV record, your matrix domain (`server_name`) may not +point to the same host that your Synapse is running on (the 'target +domain'). (If it does, you can follow the recommendation above; otherwise, read +on.) + +Let's assume that your `server_name` is `example.com`, and your Synapse is +hosted at a target domain of `customer.example.net`. Currently you should have +an SRV record which looks like: + +``` +_matrix._tcp.example.com. IN SRV 10 5 443 customer.example.net. +``` + +In this situation, you have two choices for how to proceed: + +#### Option 1: give Synapse a certificate for your matrix domain + +Synapse 1.0 will expect your server to present a TLS certificate for your +`server_name` (`example.com` in the above example). You can achieve this by +doing one of the following: + + * Acquire a certificate for the `server_name` yourself (for example, using + `certbot`), and give it and the key to Synapse via `tls_certificate_path` + and `tls_private_key_path`, or: + + * Use Synapse's [ACME support](./ACME.md), and forward port 80 on the + `server_name` domain to your Synapse instance, or: + + * Set up a reverse-proxy on port 8448 on the `server_name` domain, which + forwards to Synapse. Once it is set up, you can remove the SRV record. + +#### Option 2: add a .well-known file to delegate your matrix traffic + +This will allow you to keep Synapse on a separate domain, without having to +give it a certificate for the matrix domain. + +You can do this with a `.well-known` file as follows: + + 1. Keep the SRV record in place - it is needed for backwards compatibility + with Synapse 0.34 and earlier. + + 2. Give synapse a certificate corresponding to the target domain + (`customer.example.net` in the above example). Currently Synapse's ACME + support [does not support + this](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/4552), so you will have + to acquire a certificate yourself and give it to Synapse via + `tls_certificate_path` and `tls_private_key_path`. + + 3. Restart Synapse to ensure the new certificate is loaded. + + 4. Arrange for a `.well-known` file at + `https://<server_name>/.well-known/matrix/server` with contents: + + ```json + {"m.server": "<target domain>:<port>"} + ``` + + In the above example, `https://example.com/.well-known/matrix/server` + should have the contents: + + ```json + {"m.server": "customer.example.net:443"} + ``` + +## FAQ + ### Synapse 0.99.0 has just been released, what do I need to do right now? Upgrade as soon as you can in preparation for Synapse 1.0.0. @@ -126,14 +203,13 @@ other servers know how to find it. The easiest way to do this is with a .well-known/matrix/server URI on the webroot of the domain to advertise your server. For instance, if you ran -"matrixhosting.com" and you were hosting a Matrix server for example.com, you -would ask example.com to create a file at: - -`https://example.com/.well-known/matrix/server` +"matrixhosting.com" and you were hosting a Matrix server for `example.com`, you +would ask `example.com` to create a file at +`https://example.com/.well-known/matrix/server` with contents: -with contents: - -`{"m.server": "example.matrixhosting.com:8448"}` +```json +{"m.server": "example.matrixhosting.com:8448"} +``` ...which would tell servers trying to connect to example.com to instead connect to example.matrixhosting.com on port 8448. You would then configure Synapse @@ -231,7 +307,7 @@ We no longer actively recommend against using a reverse proxy. Many admins will find it easier to direct federation traffic to a reverse-proxy and manage their own TLS certificates, and this is a supported configuration. -### Do I still need to give my TLS certificates to Synapse if I am using a reverse proxy? +### Do I still need to give my TLS certificates to Synapse if I am using a reverse proxy? Practically speaking, this is no longer necessary. |