Split `event_auth.check` into two parts (#10940)

Broadly, the existing `event_auth.check` function has two parts:
 * a validation section: checks that the event isn't too big, that it has the rught signatures, etc. 
   This bit is independent of the rest of the state in the room, and so need only be done once 
   for each event.
 * an auth section: ensures that the event is allowed, given the rest of the state in the room.
   This gets done multiple times, against various sets of room state, because it forms part of
   the state res algorithm.

Currently, this is implemented with `do_sig_check` and `do_size_check` parameters, but I think
that makes everything hard to follow. Instead, we split the function in two and call each part
separately where it is needed.

10 files changed, 177 insertions, 172 deletions

diff --git a/changelog.d/10940.misc b/changelog.d/10940.misc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..9a765435db
--- /dev/null
+++ b/changelog.d/10940.misc
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+Clean up some of the federation event authentication code for clarity.
diff --git a/synapse/event_auth.py b/synapse/event_auth.py
index 5d7c6fa858..eef354de6e 100644
--- a/synapse/event_auth.py
+++ b/synapse/event_auth.py
@@ -41,42 +41,112 @@ from synapse.types import StateMap, UserID, get_domain_from_id
 logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
 
 
-def check(
-    room_version_obj: RoomVersion,
-    event: EventBase,
-    auth_events: StateMap[EventBase],
-    do_sig_check: bool = True,
-    do_size_check: bool = True,
+def validate_event_for_room_version(
+    room_version_obj: RoomVersion, event: EventBase
 ) -> None:
-    """Checks if this event is correctly authed.
+    """Ensure that the event complies with the limits, and has the right signatures
+
+    NB: does not *validate* the signatures - it assumes that any signatures present
+    have already been checked.
+
+    NB: it does not check that the event satisfies the auth rules (that is done in
+    check_auth_rules_for_event) - these tests are independent of the rest of the state
+    in the room.
+
+    NB: This is used to check events that have been received over federation. As such,
+    it can only enforce the checks specified in the relevant room version, to avoid
+    a split-brain situation where some servers accept such events, and others reject
+    them.
+
+    TODO: consider moving this into EventValidator
 
     Args:
-        room_version_obj: the version of the room
-        event: the event being checked.
-        auth_events: the existing room state.
-        do_sig_check: True if it should be verified that the sending server
-            signed the event.
-        do_size_check: True if the size of the event fields should be verified.
+        room_version_obj: the version of the room which contains this event
+        event: the event to be checked
 
     Raises:
-        AuthError if the checks fail
-
-    Returns:
-         if the auth checks pass.
+        SynapseError if there is a problem with the event
     """
-    assert isinstance(auth_events, dict)
-
-    if do_size_check:
-        _check_size_limits(event)
+    _check_size_limits(event)
 
     if not hasattr(event, "room_id"):
         raise AuthError(500, "Event has no room_id: %s" % event)
 
-    room_id = event.room_id
+    # check that the event has the correct signatures
+    sender_domain = get_domain_from_id(event.sender)
+
+    is_invite_via_3pid = (
+        event.type == EventTypes.Member
+        and event.membership == Membership.INVITE
+        and "third_party_invite" in event.content
+    )
+
+    # Check the sender's domain has signed the event
+    if not event.signatures.get(sender_domain):
+        # We allow invites via 3pid to have a sender from a different
+        # HS, as the sender must match the sender of the original
+        # 3pid invite. This is checked further down with the
+        # other dedicated membership checks.
+        if not is_invite_via_3pid:
+            raise AuthError(403, "Event not signed by sender's server")
+
+    if event.format_version in (EventFormatVersions.V1,):
+        # Only older room versions have event IDs to check.
+        event_id_domain = get_domain_from_id(event.event_id)
+
+        # Check the origin domain has signed the event
+        if not event.signatures.get(event_id_domain):
+            raise AuthError(403, "Event not signed by sending server")
+
+    is_invite_via_allow_rule = (
+        room_version_obj.msc3083_join_rules
+        and event.type == EventTypes.Member
+        and event.membership == Membership.JOIN
+        and "join_authorised_via_users_server" in event.content
+    )
+    if is_invite_via_allow_rule:
+        authoriser_domain = get_domain_from_id(
+            event.content["join_authorised_via_users_server"]
+        )
+        if not event.signatures.get(authoriser_domain):
+            raise AuthError(403, "Event not signed by authorising server")
+
+
+def check_auth_rules_for_event(
+    room_version_obj: RoomVersion, event: EventBase, auth_events: StateMap[EventBase]
+) -> None:
+    """Check that an event complies with the auth rules
+
+    Checks whether an event passes the auth rules with a given set of state events
+
+    Assumes that we have already checked that the event is the right shape (it has
+    enough signatures, has a room ID, etc). In other words:
+
+     - it's fine for use in state resolution, when we have already decided whether to
+       accept the event or not, and are now trying to decide whether it should make it
+       into the room state
+
+     - when we're doing the initial event auth, it is only suitable in combination with
+       a bunch of other tests.
+
+    Args:
+        room_version_obj: the version of the room
+        event: the event being checked.
+        auth_events: the room state to check the events against.
+
+    Raises:
+        AuthError if the checks fail
+    """
+    assert isinstance(auth_events, dict)
 
     # We need to ensure that the auth events are actually for the same room, to
     # stop people from using powers they've been granted in other rooms for
     # example.
+    #
+    # Arguably we don't need to do this when we're just doing state res, as presumably
+    # the state res algorithm isn't silly enough to give us events from different rooms.
+    # Still, it's easier to do it anyway.
+    room_id = event.room_id
     for auth_event in auth_events.values():
         if auth_event.room_id != room_id:
             raise AuthError(
@@ -86,45 +156,6 @@ def check(
                 % (event.event_id, room_id, auth_event.event_id, auth_event.room_id),
             )
 
-    if do_sig_check:
-        sender_domain = get_domain_from_id(event.sender)
-
-        is_invite_via_3pid = (
-            event.type == EventTypes.Member
-            and event.membership == Membership.INVITE
-            and "third_party_invite" in event.content
-        )
-
-        # Check the sender's domain has signed the event
-        if not event.signatures.get(sender_domain):
-            # We allow invites via 3pid to have a sender from a different
-            # HS, as the sender must match the sender of the original
-            # 3pid invite. This is checked further down with the
-            # other dedicated membership checks.
-            if not is_invite_via_3pid:
-                raise AuthError(403, "Event not signed by sender's server")
-
-        if event.format_version in (EventFormatVersions.V1,):
-            # Only older room versions have event IDs to check.
-            event_id_domain = get_domain_from_id(event.event_id)
-
-            # Check the origin domain has signed the event
-            if not event.signatures.get(event_id_domain):
-                raise AuthError(403, "Event not signed by sending server")
-
-        is_invite_via_allow_rule = (
-            room_version_obj.msc3083_join_rules
-            and event.type == EventTypes.Member
-            and event.membership == Membership.JOIN
-            and "join_authorised_via_users_server" in event.content
-        )
-        if is_invite_via_allow_rule:
-            authoriser_domain = get_domain_from_id(
-                event.content["join_authorised_via_users_server"]
-            )
-            if not event.signatures.get(authoriser_domain):
-                raise AuthError(403, "Event not signed by authorising server")
-
     # Implementation of https://matrix.org/docs/spec/rooms/v1#authorization-rules
     #
     # 1. If type is m.room.create:
diff --git a/synapse/handlers/event_auth.py b/synapse/handlers/event_auth.py
index cb81fa0986..d089c56286 100644
--- a/synapse/handlers/event_auth.py
+++ b/synapse/handlers/event_auth.py
@@ -22,7 +22,8 @@ from synapse.api.constants import (
     RestrictedJoinRuleTypes,
 )
 from synapse.api.errors import AuthError, Codes, SynapseError
-from synapse.api.room_versions import KNOWN_ROOM_VERSIONS, RoomVersion
+from synapse.api.room_versions import RoomVersion
+from synapse.event_auth import check_auth_rules_for_event
 from synapse.events import EventBase
 from synapse.events.builder import EventBuilder
 from synapse.events.snapshot import EventContext
@@ -45,21 +46,17 @@ class EventAuthHandler:
         self._store = hs.get_datastore()
         self._server_name = hs.hostname
 
-    async def check_from_context(
+    async def check_auth_rules_from_context(
         self,
-        room_version: str,
+        room_version_obj: RoomVersion,
         event: EventBase,
         context: EventContext,
-        do_sig_check: bool = True,
     ) -> None:
+        """Check an event passes the auth rules at its own auth events"""
         auth_event_ids = event.auth_event_ids()
         auth_events_by_id = await self._store.get_events(auth_event_ids)
         auth_events = {(e.type, e.state_key): e for e in auth_events_by_id.values()}
-
-        room_version_obj = KNOWN_ROOM_VERSIONS[room_version]
-        event_auth.check(
-            room_version_obj, event, auth_events=auth_events, do_sig_check=do_sig_check
-        )
+        check_auth_rules_for_event(room_version_obj, event, auth_events)
 
     def compute_auth_events(
         self,
diff --git a/synapse/handlers/federation.py b/synapse/handlers/federation.py
index 3b0b895b07..0a10a5c28a 100644
--- a/synapse/handlers/federation.py
+++ b/synapse/handlers/federation.py
@@ -40,6 +40,10 @@ from synapse.api.errors import (
 )
 from synapse.api.room_versions import KNOWN_ROOM_VERSIONS, RoomVersion, RoomVersions
 from synapse.crypto.event_signing import compute_event_signature
+from synapse.event_auth import (
+    check_auth_rules_for_event,
+    validate_event_for_room_version,
+)
 from synapse.events import EventBase
 from synapse.events.snapshot import EventContext
 from synapse.events.validator import EventValidator
@@ -742,10 +746,9 @@ class FederationHandler(BaseHandler):
 
         # The remote hasn't signed it yet, obviously. We'll do the full checks
         # when we get the event back in `on_send_join_request`
-        await self._event_auth_handler.check_from_context(
-            room_version.identifier, event, context, do_sig_check=False
+        await self._event_auth_handler.check_auth_rules_from_context(
+            room_version, event, context
         )
-
         return event
 
     async def on_invite_request(
@@ -916,8 +919,8 @@ class FederationHandler(BaseHandler):
         try:
             # The remote hasn't signed it yet, obviously. We'll do the full checks
             # when we get the event back in `on_send_leave_request`
-            await self._event_auth_handler.check_from_context(
-                room_version_obj.identifier, event, context, do_sig_check=False
+            await self._event_auth_handler.check_auth_rules_from_context(
+                room_version_obj, event, context
             )
         except AuthError as e:
             logger.warning("Failed to create new leave %r because %s", event, e)
@@ -978,8 +981,8 @@ class FederationHandler(BaseHandler):
         try:
             # The remote hasn't signed it yet, obviously. We'll do the full checks
             # when we get the event back in `on_send_knock_request`
-            await self._event_auth_handler.check_from_context(
-                room_version_obj.identifier, event, context, do_sig_check=False
+            await self._event_auth_handler.check_auth_rules_from_context(
+                room_version_obj, event, context
             )
         except AuthError as e:
             logger.warning("Failed to create new knock %r because %s", event, e)
@@ -1168,7 +1171,8 @@ class FederationHandler(BaseHandler):
                 auth_for_e[(EventTypes.Create, "")] = create_event
 
             try:
-                event_auth.check(room_version, e, auth_events=auth_for_e)
+                validate_event_for_room_version(room_version, e)
+                check_auth_rules_for_event(room_version, e, auth_for_e)
             except SynapseError as err:
                 # we may get SynapseErrors here as well as AuthErrors. For
                 # instance, there are a couple of (ancient) events in some
@@ -1266,8 +1270,9 @@ class FederationHandler(BaseHandler):
             event.internal_metadata.send_on_behalf_of = self.hs.hostname
 
             try:
-                await self._event_auth_handler.check_from_context(
-                    room_version_obj.identifier, event, context
+                validate_event_for_room_version(room_version_obj, event)
+                await self._event_auth_handler.check_auth_rules_from_context(
+                    room_version_obj, event, context
                 )
             except AuthError as e:
                 logger.warning("Denying new third party invite %r because %s", event, e)
@@ -1317,8 +1322,9 @@ class FederationHandler(BaseHandler):
         )
 
         try:
-            await self._event_auth_handler.check_from_context(
-                room_version_obj.identifier, event, context
+            validate_event_for_room_version(room_version_obj, event)
+            await self._event_auth_handler.check_auth_rules_from_context(
+                room_version_obj, event, context
             )
         except AuthError as e:
             logger.warning("Denying third party invite %r because %s", event, e)
diff --git a/synapse/handlers/federation_event.py b/synapse/handlers/federation_event.py
index 2c4644b4a3..e587b5b3b3 100644
--- a/synapse/handlers/federation_event.py
+++ b/synapse/handlers/federation_event.py
@@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ from typing import (
 
 from prometheus_client import Counter
 
-from synapse import event_auth
 from synapse.api.constants import (
     EventContentFields,
     EventTypes,
@@ -47,7 +46,11 @@ from synapse.api.errors import (
     SynapseError,
 )
 from synapse.api.room_versions import KNOWN_ROOM_VERSIONS
-from synapse.event_auth import auth_types_for_event
+from synapse.event_auth import (
+    auth_types_for_event,
+    check_auth_rules_for_event,
+    validate_event_for_room_version,
+)
 from synapse.events import EventBase
 from synapse.events.snapshot import EventContext
 from synapse.federation.federation_client import InvalidResponseError
@@ -1207,7 +1210,8 @@ class FederationEventHandler:
 
                 context = EventContext.for_outlier()
                 try:
-                    event_auth.check(room_version_obj, event, auth_events=auth)
+                    validate_event_for_room_version(room_version_obj, event)
+                    check_auth_rules_for_event(room_version_obj, event, auth)
                 except AuthError as e:
                     logger.warning("Rejecting %r because %s", event, e)
                     context.rejected = RejectedReason.AUTH_ERROR
@@ -1282,7 +1286,8 @@ class FederationEventHandler:
             auth_events_for_auth = calculated_auth_event_map
 
         try:
-            event_auth.check(room_version_obj, event, auth_events=auth_events_for_auth)
+            validate_event_for_room_version(room_version_obj, event)
+            check_auth_rules_for_event(room_version_obj, event, auth_events_for_auth)
         except AuthError as e:
             logger.warning("Failed auth resolution for %r because %s", event, e)
             context.rejected = RejectedReason.AUTH_ERROR
@@ -1394,7 +1399,10 @@ class FederationEventHandler:
         }
 
         try:
-            event_auth.check(room_version_obj, event, auth_events=current_auth_events)
+            # TODO: skip the call to validate_event_for_room_version? we should already
+            #    have validated the event.
+            validate_event_for_room_version(room_version_obj, event)
+            check_auth_rules_for_event(room_version_obj, event, current_auth_events)
         except AuthError as e:
             logger.warning(
                 "Soft-failing %r (from %s) because %s",
diff --git a/synapse/handlers/message.py b/synapse/handlers/message.py
index 3b8cc50ec0..cdac53037c 100644
--- a/synapse/handlers/message.py
+++ b/synapse/handlers/message.py
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ from synapse.api.errors import (
 )
 from synapse.api.room_versions import KNOWN_ROOM_VERSIONS, RoomVersions
 from synapse.api.urls import ConsentURIBuilder
+from synapse.event_auth import validate_event_for_room_version
 from synapse.events import EventBase
 from synapse.events.builder import EventBuilder
 from synapse.events.snapshot import EventContext
@@ -1098,8 +1099,9 @@ class EventCreationHandler:
             assert event.content["membership"] == Membership.LEAVE
         else:
             try:
-                await self._event_auth_handler.check_from_context(
-                    room_version_obj.identifier, event, context
+                validate_event_for_room_version(room_version_obj, event)
+                await self._event_auth_handler.check_auth_rules_from_context(
+                    room_version_obj, event, context
                 )
             except AuthError as err:
                 logger.warning("Denying new event %r because %s", event, err)
diff --git a/synapse/handlers/room.py b/synapse/handlers/room.py
index bf8a85f563..873e08258e 100644
--- a/synapse/handlers/room.py
+++ b/synapse/handlers/room.py
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ from synapse.api.errors import (
 )
 from synapse.api.filtering import Filter
 from synapse.api.room_versions import KNOWN_ROOM_VERSIONS, RoomVersion
+from synapse.event_auth import validate_event_for_room_version
 from synapse.events import EventBase
 from synapse.events.utils import copy_power_levels_contents
 from synapse.rest.admin._base import assert_user_is_admin
@@ -238,8 +239,9 @@ class RoomCreationHandler(BaseHandler):
             },
         )
         old_room_version = await self.store.get_room_version(old_room_id)
-        await self._event_auth_handler.check_from_context(
-            old_room_version.identifier, tombstone_event, tombstone_context
+        validate_event_for_room_version(old_room_version, tombstone_event)
+        await self._event_auth_handler.check_auth_rules_from_context(
+            old_room_version, tombstone_event, tombstone_context
         )
 
         await self.clone_existing_room(
diff --git a/synapse/state/v1.py b/synapse/state/v1.py
index 92336d7cc8..017e6fd92d 100644
--- a/synapse/state/v1.py
+++ b/synapse/state/v1.py
@@ -329,12 +329,10 @@ def _resolve_auth_events(
         auth_events[(prev_event.type, prev_event.state_key)] = prev_event
         try:
             # The signatures have already been checked at this point
-            event_auth.check(
+            event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
                 RoomVersions.V1,
                 event,
                 auth_events,
-                do_sig_check=False,
-                do_size_check=False,
             )
             prev_event = event
         except AuthError:
@@ -349,12 +347,10 @@ def _resolve_normal_events(
     for event in _ordered_events(events):
         try:
             # The signatures have already been checked at this point
-            event_auth.check(
+            event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
                 RoomVersions.V1,
                 event,
                 auth_events,
-                do_sig_check=False,
-                do_size_check=False,
             )
             return event
         except AuthError:
diff --git a/synapse/state/v2.py b/synapse/state/v2.py
index 7b1e8361de..586b0e12fe 100644
--- a/synapse/state/v2.py
+++ b/synapse/state/v2.py
@@ -546,12 +546,10 @@ async def _iterative_auth_checks(
                     auth_events[key] = event_map[ev_id]
 
         try:
-            event_auth.check(
+            event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
                 room_version,
                 event,
                 auth_events,
-                do_sig_check=False,
-                do_size_check=False,
             )
 
             resolved_state[(event.type, event.state_key)] = event_id
diff --git a/tests/test_event_auth.py b/tests/test_event_auth.py
index 6ebd01bcbe..e7a7d00883 100644
--- a/tests/test_event_auth.py
+++ b/tests/test_event_auth.py
@@ -37,21 +37,19 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
         }
 
         # creator should be able to send state
-        event_auth.check(
+        event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
             RoomVersions.V1,
             _random_state_event(creator),
             auth_events,
-            do_sig_check=False,
         )
 
         # joiner should not be able to send state
         self.assertRaises(
             AuthError,
-            event_auth.check,
+            event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event,
             RoomVersions.V1,
             _random_state_event(joiner),
             auth_events,
-            do_sig_check=False,
         )
 
     def test_state_default_level(self):
@@ -76,19 +74,17 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
         # pleb should not be able to send state
         self.assertRaises(
             AuthError,
-            event_auth.check,
+            event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event,
             RoomVersions.V1,
             _random_state_event(pleb),
             auth_events,
-            do_sig_check=False,
         ),
 
         # king should be able to send state
-        event_auth.check(
+        event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
             RoomVersions.V1,
             _random_state_event(king),
             auth_events,
-            do_sig_check=False,
         )
 
     def test_alias_event(self):
@@ -101,37 +97,33 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
         }
 
         # creator should be able to send aliases
-        event_auth.check(
+        event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
             RoomVersions.V1,
             _alias_event(creator),
             auth_events,
-            do_sig_check=False,
         )
 
         # Reject an event with no state key.
         with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
-            event_auth.check(
+            event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
                 RoomVersions.V1,
                 _alias_event(creator, state_key=""),
                 auth_events,
-                do_sig_check=False,
             )
 
         # If the domain of the sender does not match the state key, reject.
         with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
-            event_auth.check(
+            event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
                 RoomVersions.V1,
                 _alias_event(creator, state_key="test.com"),
                 auth_events,
-                do_sig_check=False,
             )
 
         # Note that the member does *not* need to be in the room.
-        event_auth.check(
+        event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
             RoomVersions.V1,
             _alias_event(other),
             auth_events,
-            do_sig_check=False,
         )
 
     def test_msc2432_alias_event(self):
@@ -144,34 +136,30 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
         }
 
         # creator should be able to send aliases
-        event_auth.check(
+        event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
             RoomVersions.V6,
             _alias_event(creator),
             auth_events,
-            do_sig_check=False,
         )
 
         # No particular checks are done on the state key.
-        event_auth.check(
+        event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
             RoomVersions.V6,
             _alias_event(creator, state_key=""),
             auth_events,
-            do_sig_check=False,
         )
-        event_auth.check(
+        event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
             RoomVersions.V6,
             _alias_event(creator, state_key="test.com"),
             auth_events,
-            do_sig_check=False,
         )
 
         # Per standard auth rules, the member must be in the room.
         with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
-            event_auth.check(
+            event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
                 RoomVersions.V6,
                 _alias_event(other),
                 auth_events,
-                do_sig_check=False,
             )
 
     def test_msc2209(self):
@@ -191,20 +179,18 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
         }
 
         # pleb should be able to modify the notifications power level.
-        event_auth.check(
+        event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
             RoomVersions.V1,
             _power_levels_event(pleb, {"notifications": {"room": 100}}),
             auth_events,
-            do_sig_check=False,
         )
 
         # But an MSC2209 room rejects this change.
         with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
-            event_auth.check(
+            event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
                 RoomVersions.V6,
                 _power_levels_event(pleb, {"notifications": {"room": 100}}),
                 auth_events,
-                do_sig_check=False,
             )
 
     def test_join_rules_public(self):
@@ -221,59 +207,53 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
         }
 
         # Check join.
-        event_auth.check(
+        event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
             RoomVersions.V6,
             _join_event(pleb),
             auth_events,
-            do_sig_check=False,
         )
 
         # A user cannot be force-joined to a room.
         with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
-            event_auth.check(
+            event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
                 RoomVersions.V6,
                 _member_event(pleb, "join", sender=creator),
                 auth_events,
-                do_sig_check=False,
             )
 
         # Banned should be rejected.
         auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "ban")
         with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
-            event_auth.check(
+            event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
                 RoomVersions.V6,
                 _join_event(pleb),
                 auth_events,
-                do_sig_check=False,
             )
 
         # A user who left can re-join.
         auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "leave")
-        event_auth.check(
+        event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
             RoomVersions.V6,
             _join_event(pleb),
             auth_events,
-            do_sig_check=False,
         )
 
         # A user can send a join if they're in the room.
         auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "join")
-        event_auth.check(
+        event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
             RoomVersions.V6,
             _join_event(pleb),
             auth_events,
-            do_sig_check=False,
         )
 
         # A user can accept an invite.
         auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(
             pleb, "invite", sender=creator
         )
-        event_auth.check(
+        event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
             RoomVersions.V6,
             _join_event(pleb),
             auth_events,
-            do_sig_check=False,
         )
 
     def test_join_rules_invite(self):
@@ -291,60 +271,54 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
 
         # A join without an invite is rejected.
         with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
-            event_auth.check(
+            event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
                 RoomVersions.V6,
                 _join_event(pleb),
                 auth_events,
-                do_sig_check=False,
             )
 
         # A user cannot be force-joined to a room.
         with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
-            event_auth.check(
+            event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
                 RoomVersions.V6,
                 _member_event(pleb, "join", sender=creator),
                 auth_events,
-                do_sig_check=False,
             )
 
         # Banned should be rejected.
         auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "ban")
         with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
-            event_auth.check(
+            event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
                 RoomVersions.V6,
                 _join_event(pleb),
                 auth_events,
-                do_sig_check=False,
             )
 
         # A user who left cannot re-join.
         auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "leave")
         with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
-            event_auth.check(
+            event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
                 RoomVersions.V6,
                 _join_event(pleb),
                 auth_events,
-                do_sig_check=False,
             )
 
         # A user can send a join if they're in the room.
         auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "join")
-        event_auth.check(
+        event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
             RoomVersions.V6,
             _join_event(pleb),
             auth_events,
-            do_sig_check=False,
         )
 
         # A user can accept an invite.
         auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(
             pleb, "invite", sender=creator
         )
-        event_auth.check(
+        event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
             RoomVersions.V6,
             _join_event(pleb),
             auth_events,
-            do_sig_check=False,
         )
 
     def test_join_rules_msc3083_restricted(self):
@@ -369,11 +343,10 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
 
         # Older room versions don't understand this join rule
         with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
-            event_auth.check(
+            event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
                 RoomVersions.V6,
                 _join_event(pleb),
                 auth_events,
-                do_sig_check=False,
             )
 
         # A properly formatted join event should work.
@@ -383,11 +356,10 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
                 "join_authorised_via_users_server": "@creator:example.com"
             },
         )
-        event_auth.check(
+        event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
             RoomVersions.V8,
             authorised_join_event,
             auth_events,
-            do_sig_check=False,
         )
 
         # A join issued by a specific user works (i.e. the power level checks
@@ -399,7 +371,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
         pl_auth_events[("m.room.member", "@inviter:foo.test")] = _join_event(
             "@inviter:foo.test"
         )
-        event_auth.check(
+        event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
             RoomVersions.V8,
             _join_event(
                 pleb,
@@ -408,16 +380,14 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
                 },
             ),
             pl_auth_events,
-            do_sig_check=False,
         )
 
         # A join which is missing an authorised server is rejected.
         with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
-            event_auth.check(
+            event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
                 RoomVersions.V8,
                 _join_event(pleb),
                 auth_events,
-                do_sig_check=False,
             )
 
         # An join authorised by a user who is not in the room is rejected.
@@ -426,7 +396,7 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
             creator, {"invite": 100, "users": {"@other:example.com": 150}}
         )
         with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
-            event_auth.check(
+            event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
                 RoomVersions.V8,
                 _join_event(
                     pleb,
@@ -435,13 +405,12 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
                     },
                 ),
                 auth_events,
-                do_sig_check=False,
             )
 
         # A user cannot be force-joined to a room. (This uses an event which
         # *would* be valid, but is sent be a different user.)
         with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
-            event_auth.check(
+            event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
                 RoomVersions.V8,
                 _member_event(
                     pleb,
@@ -452,36 +421,32 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
                     },
                 ),
                 auth_events,
-                do_sig_check=False,
             )
 
         # Banned should be rejected.
         auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "ban")
         with self.assertRaises(AuthError):
-            event_auth.check(
+            event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
                 RoomVersions.V8,
                 authorised_join_event,
                 auth_events,
-                do_sig_check=False,
             )
 
         # A user who left can re-join.
         auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "leave")
-        event_auth.check(
+        event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
             RoomVersions.V8,
             authorised_join_event,
             auth_events,
-            do_sig_check=False,
         )
 
         # A user can send a join if they're in the room. (This doesn't need to
         # be authorised since the user is already joined.)
         auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(pleb, "join")
-        event_auth.check(
+        event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
             RoomVersions.V8,
             _join_event(pleb),
             auth_events,
-            do_sig_check=False,
         )
 
         # A user can accept an invite. (This doesn't need to be authorised since
@@ -489,11 +454,10 @@ class EventAuthTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
         auth_events[("m.room.member", pleb)] = _member_event(
             pleb, "invite", sender=creator
         )
-        event_auth.check(
+        event_auth.check_auth_rules_for_event(
             RoomVersions.V8,
             _join_event(pleb),
             auth_events,
-            do_sig_check=False,
         )