diff options
author | Dan Callahan <danc@element.io> | 2021-06-08 11:44:50 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2021-06-08 11:44:50 +0100 |
commit | 7dc14730d925a39a885a14ce309d99054f9617d5 (patch) | |
tree | 245c19599fdae8a9e832c3f88e92f8cb8a2d58da | |
parent | When joining a remote room limit the number of events we concurrently check s... (diff) | |
download | synapse-7dc14730d925a39a885a14ce309d99054f9617d5.tar.xz |
Name release branches just after major.minor (#10013)
With the prior format, 1.33.0 / 1.33.1 / 1.33.2 got separate branches: release-v1.33.0 release-v1.33.1 release-v1.33.2 Under the new model, all three would share a common branch: release-v1.33 As before, RCs and actual releases exist as tags on these branches. This better reflects our support model, e.g., that the "1.33" series had a formal release followed by two patches / updates. Signed-off-by: Dan Callahan <danc@element.io>
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r-- | changelog.d/10013.misc | 1 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | docs/dev/git.md | 8 | ||||
-rwxr-xr-x | scripts-dev/release.py | 2 |
3 files changed, 6 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/changelog.d/10013.misc b/changelog.d/10013.misc new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..9d164d9ce2 --- /dev/null +++ b/changelog.d/10013.misc @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +Simplify naming convention for release branches to only include the major and minor version numbers. diff --git a/docs/dev/git.md b/docs/dev/git.md index b747ff20c9..87950f07b2 100644 --- a/docs/dev/git.md +++ b/docs/dev/git.md @@ -122,15 +122,15 @@ So, what counts as a more- or less-stable branch? A little reflection will show that our active branches are ordered thus, from more-stable to less-stable: * `master` (tracks our last release). - * `release-vX.Y.Z` (the branch where we prepare the next release)<sup + * `release-vX.Y` (the branch where we prepare the next release)<sup id="a3">[3](#f3)</sup>. * PR branches which are targeting the release. * `develop` (our "mainline" branch containing our bleeding-edge). * regular PR branches. The corollary is: if you have a bugfix that needs to land in both -`release-vX.Y.Z` *and* `develop`, then you should base your PR on -`release-vX.Y.Z`, get it merged there, and then merge from `release-vX.Y.Z` to +`release-vX.Y` *and* `develop`, then you should base your PR on +`release-vX.Y`, get it merged there, and then merge from `release-vX.Y` to `develop`. (If a fix lands in `develop` and we later need it in a release-branch, we can of course cherry-pick it, but landing it in the release branch first helps reduce the chance of annoying conflicts.) @@ -145,4 +145,4 @@ most intuitive name. [^](#a1) <b id="f3">[3]</b>: Very, very occasionally (I think this has happened once in the history of Synapse), we've had two releases in flight at once. Obviously, -`release-v1.2.3` is more-stable than `release-v1.3.0`. [^](#a3) +`release-v1.2` is more-stable than `release-v1.3`. [^](#a3) diff --git a/scripts-dev/release.py b/scripts-dev/release.py index 1042fa48bc..fc3df9071c 100755 --- a/scripts-dev/release.py +++ b/scripts-dev/release.py @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ def run(): click.get_current_context().abort() # Switch to the release branch. - release_branch_name = f"release-v{base_version}" + release_branch_name = f"release-v{current_version.major}.{current_version.minor}" release_branch = find_ref(repo, release_branch_name) if release_branch: if release_branch.is_remote(): |