diff --git a/tests/handlers/test_sliding_sync.py b/tests/handlers/test_sliding_sync.py
index eb4b0a05c7..a7aa9bb8af 100644
--- a/tests/handlers/test_sliding_sync.py
+++ b/tests/handlers/test_sliding_sync.py
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
#
import logging
from copy import deepcopy
-from typing import Optional
+from typing import Dict, Optional
from unittest.mock import patch
from parameterized import parameterized
@@ -37,12 +37,16 @@ from synapse.api.constants import (
from synapse.api.room_versions import RoomVersions
from synapse.events import make_event_from_dict
from synapse.events.snapshot import EventContext
-from synapse.handlers.sliding_sync import RoomSyncConfig, StateValues
+from synapse.handlers.sliding_sync import (
+ RoomSyncConfig,
+ StateValues,
+ _RoomMembershipForUser,
+)
from synapse.rest import admin
from synapse.rest.client import knock, login, room
from synapse.server import HomeServer
from synapse.storage.util.id_generators import MultiWriterIdGenerator
-from synapse.types import JsonDict, UserID
+from synapse.types import JsonDict, StreamToken, UserID
from synapse.types.handlers import SlidingSyncConfig
from synapse.util import Clock
@@ -581,9 +585,9 @@ class RoomSyncConfigTestCase(TestCase):
self._assert_room_config_equal(room_sync_config_b, expected, "A into B")
-class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
+class GetRoomMembershipForUserAtToTokenTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
"""
- Tests Sliding Sync handler `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` to make sure it returns
+ Tests Sliding Sync handler `get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token()` to make sure it returns
the correct list of rooms IDs.
"""
@@ -616,7 +620,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
now_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
room_id_results = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=now_token,
to_token=now_token,
@@ -643,7 +647,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
after_room_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
room_id_results = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=before_room_token,
to_token=after_room_token,
@@ -657,9 +661,11 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
room_id_results[room_id].event_id,
join_response["event_id"],
)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id].membership, Membership.JOIN)
# We should be considered `newly_joined` because we joined during the token
# range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id].newly_joined, True)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id].newly_left, False)
def test_get_already_joined_room(self) -> None:
"""
@@ -676,7 +682,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
after_room_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
room_id_results = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=after_room_token,
to_token=after_room_token,
@@ -690,8 +696,10 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
room_id_results[room_id].event_id,
join_response["event_id"],
)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id].membership, Membership.JOIN)
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we joined before the token range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id].newly_joined, False)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id].newly_left, False)
def test_get_invited_banned_knocked_room(self) -> None:
"""
@@ -748,7 +756,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
after_room_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
room_id_results = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=before_room_token,
to_token=after_room_token,
@@ -770,19 +778,25 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
room_id_results[invited_room_id].event_id,
invite_response["event_id"],
)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[invited_room_id].membership, Membership.INVITE)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[invited_room_id].newly_joined, False)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[invited_room_id].newly_left, False)
+
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results[ban_room_id].event_id,
ban_response["event_id"],
)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[ban_room_id].membership, Membership.BAN)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[ban_room_id].newly_joined, False)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[ban_room_id].newly_left, False)
+
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results[knock_room_id].event_id,
knock_room_membership_state_event.event_id,
)
- # We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we were not joined at the the time
- # of the `to_token`.
- self.assertEqual(room_id_results[invited_room_id].newly_joined, False)
- self.assertEqual(room_id_results[ban_room_id].newly_joined, False)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[knock_room_id].membership, Membership.KNOCK)
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[knock_room_id].newly_joined, False)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[knock_room_id].newly_left, False)
def test_get_kicked_room(self) -> None:
"""
@@ -814,7 +828,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
after_kick_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
room_id_results = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=after_kick_token,
to_token=after_kick_token,
@@ -828,9 +842,12 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
room_id_results[kick_room_id].event_id,
kick_response["event_id"],
)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[kick_room_id].membership, Membership.LEAVE)
+ self.assertNotEqual(room_id_results[kick_room_id].sender, user1_id)
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we were not joined at the the time
# of the `to_token`.
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[kick_room_id].newly_joined, False)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[kick_room_id].newly_left, False)
def test_forgotten_rooms(self) -> None:
"""
@@ -904,7 +921,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200, channel.result)
room_id_results = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=before_room_forgets,
to_token=before_room_forgets,
@@ -914,52 +931,58 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
# We shouldn't see the room because it was forgotten
self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), set())
- def test_only_newly_left_rooms_show_up(self) -> None:
+ def test_newly_left_rooms(self) -> None:
"""
- Test that newly_left rooms still show up in the sync response but rooms that
- were left before the `from_token` don't show up. See condition "2)" comments in
- the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user` method.
+ Test that newly_left are marked properly
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
# Leave before we calculate the `from_token`
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
- self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+ leave_response1 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Leave during the from_token/to_token range (newly_left)
room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
- _leave_response2 = self.helper.leave(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+ leave_response2 = self.helper.leave(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
after_room2_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
room_id_results = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=after_room1_token,
to_token=after_room2_token,
)
)
- # Only the newly_left room should show up
- self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id2})
- # It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range but
- # the `event_id` is `None` because we left the room causing the server to leave
- # the room because no other local users are in it (quirk of the
- # `current_state_delta_stream` table that we source things from)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1, room_id2})
+
+ self.assertEqual(
+ room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
+ leave_response1["event_id"],
+ )
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].membership, Membership.LEAVE)
+ # We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` or `newly_left` because that happened before
+ # the from/to range
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_left, False)
+
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results[room_id2].event_id,
- None, # _leave_response2["event_id"],
+ leave_response2["event_id"],
)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id2].membership, Membership.LEAVE)
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we are instead `newly_left`
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id2].newly_joined, False)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id2].newly_left, True)
def test_no_joins_after_to_token(self) -> None:
"""
Rooms we join after the `to_token` should *not* show up. See condition "1b)"
- comments in the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
+ comments in the `get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token()` method.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
@@ -978,7 +1001,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
room_id_results = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=before_room1_token,
to_token=after_room1_token,
@@ -991,14 +1014,16 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
join_response1["event_id"],
)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].membership, Membership.JOIN)
# We should be `newly_joined` because we joined during the token range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, True)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_left, False)
def test_join_during_range_and_left_room_after_to_token(self) -> None:
"""
Room still shows up if we left the room but were joined during the
from_token/to_token. See condition "1a)" comments in the
- `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
+ `get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token()` method.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
@@ -1016,7 +1041,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
leave_response = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
room_id_results = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=before_room1_token,
to_token=after_room1_token,
@@ -1038,14 +1063,16 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
}
),
)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].membership, Membership.JOIN)
# We should be `newly_joined` because we joined during the token range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, True)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_left, False)
def test_join_before_range_and_left_room_after_to_token(self) -> None:
"""
Room still shows up if we left the room but were joined before the `from_token`
so it should show up. See condition "1a)" comments in the
- `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
+ `get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token()` method.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
@@ -1061,7 +1088,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
leave_response = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
room_id_results = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=after_room1_token,
to_token=after_room1_token,
@@ -1082,14 +1109,16 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
}
),
)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].membership, Membership.JOIN)
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we joined before the token range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_left, False)
def test_kicked_before_range_and_left_after_to_token(self) -> None:
"""
Room still shows up if we left the room but were kicked before the `from_token`
so it should show up. See condition "1a)" comments in the
- `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
+ `get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token()` method.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
@@ -1123,7 +1152,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
leave_response = self.helper.leave(kick_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
room_id_results = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=after_kick_token,
to_token=after_kick_token,
@@ -1146,14 +1175,17 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
}
),
)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[kick_room_id].membership, Membership.LEAVE)
+ self.assertNotEqual(room_id_results[kick_room_id].sender, user1_id)
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we were kicked
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[kick_room_id].newly_joined, False)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[kick_room_id].newly_left, False)
def test_newly_left_during_range_and_join_leave_after_to_token(self) -> None:
"""
Newly left room should show up. But we're also testing that joining and leaving
after the `to_token` doesn't mess with the results. See condition "2)" and "1a)"
- comments in the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
+ comments in the `get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token()` method.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
@@ -1176,7 +1208,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
leave_response2 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
room_id_results = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=before_room1_token,
to_token=after_room1_token,
@@ -1199,14 +1231,17 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
}
),
)
- # We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we left during the token range
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].membership, Membership.LEAVE)
+ # We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we are actually `newly_left` during
+ # the token range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_left, True)
def test_newly_left_during_range_and_join_after_to_token(self) -> None:
"""
Newly left room should show up. But we're also testing that joining after the
`to_token` doesn't mess with the results. See condition "2)" and "1b)" comments
- in the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
+ in the `get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token()` method.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
@@ -1228,7 +1263,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
join_response2 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
room_id_results = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=before_room1_token,
to_token=after_room1_token,
@@ -1250,16 +1285,19 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
}
),
)
- # We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we left during the token range
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].membership, Membership.LEAVE)
+ # We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we are actually `newly_left` during
+ # the token range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_left, True)
def test_no_from_token(self) -> None:
"""
- Test that if we don't provide a `from_token`, we get all the rooms that we we're
- joined up to the `to_token`.
+ Test that if we don't provide a `from_token`, we get all the rooms that we had
+ membership in up to the `to_token`.
- Providing `from_token` only really has the effect that it adds `newly_left`
- rooms to the response.
+ Providing `from_token` only really has the effect that it marks rooms as
+ `newly_left` in the response.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
@@ -1276,7 +1314,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
# Join and leave the room2 before the `to_token`
self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
- self.helper.leave(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+ leave_response2 = self.helper.leave(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
@@ -1284,7 +1322,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
room_id_results = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=None,
to_token=after_room1_token,
@@ -1292,15 +1330,31 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
)
# Only rooms we were joined to before the `to_token` should show up
- self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1, room_id2})
+
+ # Room1
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
join_response1["event_id"],
)
- # We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because there is no `from_token` to
- # define a "live" range to compare against
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].membership, Membership.JOIN)
+ # We should *NOT* be `newly_joined`/`newly_left` because there is no
+ # `from_token` to define a "live" range to compare against
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_left, False)
+
+ # Room2
+ # It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
+ self.assertEqual(
+ room_id_results[room_id2].event_id,
+ leave_response2["event_id"],
+ )
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id2].membership, Membership.LEAVE)
+ # We should *NOT* be `newly_joined`/`newly_left` because there is no
+ # `from_token` to define a "live" range to compare against
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id2].newly_joined, False)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id2].newly_left, False)
def test_from_token_ahead_of_to_token(self) -> None:
"""
@@ -1319,28 +1373,28 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
room_id3 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
room_id4 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
- # Join room1 before `before_room_token`
- join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+ # Join room1 before `to_token`
+ join_room1_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
- # Join and leave the room2 before `before_room_token`
- self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
- self.helper.leave(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+ # Join and leave the room2 before `to_token`
+ _join_room2_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+ leave_room2_response1 = self.helper.leave(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# Note: These are purposely swapped. The `from_token` should come after
# the `to_token` in this test
to_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
- # Join room2 after `before_room_token`
- self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+ # Join room2 after `to_token`
+ _join_room2_response2 = self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# --------
- # Join room3 after `before_room_token`
- self.helper.join(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+ # Join room3 after `to_token`
+ _join_room3_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
- # Join and leave the room4 after `before_room_token`
- self.helper.join(room_id4, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
- self.helper.leave(room_id4, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+ # Join and leave the room4 after `to_token`
+ _join_room4_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id4, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+ _leave_room4_response1 = self.helper.leave(room_id4, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# Note: These are purposely swapped. The `from_token` should come after the
# `to_token` in this test
@@ -1350,31 +1404,59 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
self.helper.join(room_id4, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
room_id_results = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=from_token,
to_token=to_token,
)
)
- # Only rooms we were joined to before the `to_token` should show up
- #
- # There won't be any newly_left rooms because the `from_token` is ahead of the
- # `to_token` and that range will give no membership changes to check.
- self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
+ # In the "current" state snapshot, we're joined to all of the rooms but in the
+ # from/to token range...
+ self.assertIncludes(
+ room_id_results.keys(),
+ {
+ # Included because we were joined before both tokens
+ room_id1,
+ # Included because we had membership before the to_token
+ room_id2,
+ # Excluded because we joined after the `to_token`
+ # room_id3,
+ # Excluded because we joined after the `to_token`
+ # room_id4,
+ },
+ exact=True,
+ )
+
+ # Room1
# It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
- join_response1["event_id"],
+ join_room1_response1["event_id"],
)
- # We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we joined `room1` before either of the tokens
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].membership, Membership.JOIN)
+ # We should *NOT* be `newly_joined`/`newly_left` because we joined `room1`
+ # before either of the tokens
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_left, False)
+
+ # Room2
+ # It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
+ self.assertEqual(
+ room_id_results[room_id2].event_id,
+ leave_room2_response1["event_id"],
+ )
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id2].membership, Membership.LEAVE)
+ # We should *NOT* be `newly_joined`/`newly_left` because we joined and left
+ # `room1` before either of the tokens
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id2].newly_joined, False)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id2].newly_left, False)
def test_leave_before_range_and_join_leave_after_to_token(self) -> None:
"""
- Old left room shouldn't show up. But we're also testing that joining and leaving
- after the `to_token` doesn't mess with the results. See condition "1a)" comments
- in the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
+ Test old left rooms. But we're also testing that joining and leaving after the
+ `to_token` doesn't mess with the results. See condition "1a)" comments in the
+ `get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token()` method.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
@@ -1386,7 +1468,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
# Join and leave the room before the from/to range
self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
- self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+ leave_response = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
@@ -1395,21 +1477,30 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
room_id_results = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=after_room1_token,
to_token=after_room1_token,
)
)
- # Room shouldn't show up because it was left before the `from_token`
- self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), set())
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
+ # It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
+ self.assertEqual(
+ room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
+ leave_response["event_id"],
+ )
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].membership, Membership.LEAVE)
+ # We should *NOT* be `newly_joined`/`newly_left` because we joined and left
+ # `room1` before either of the tokens
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_left, False)
def test_leave_before_range_and_join_after_to_token(self) -> None:
"""
- Old left room shouldn't show up. But we're also testing that joining after the
- `to_token` doesn't mess with the results. See condition "1b)" comments in the
- `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
+ Test old left room. But we're also testing that joining after the `to_token`
+ doesn't mess with the results. See condition "1b)" comments in the
+ `get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token()` method.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
@@ -1421,7 +1512,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
# Join and leave the room before the from/to range
self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
- self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+ leave_response = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
@@ -1429,24 +1520,32 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
room_id_results = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=after_room1_token,
to_token=after_room1_token,
)
)
- # Room shouldn't show up because it was left before the `from_token`
- self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), set())
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
+ # It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
+ self.assertEqual(
+ room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
+ leave_response["event_id"],
+ )
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].membership, Membership.LEAVE)
+ # We should *NOT* be `newly_joined`/`newly_left` because we joined and left
+ # `room1` before either of the tokens
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_left, False)
def test_join_leave_multiple_times_during_range_and_after_to_token(
self,
) -> None:
"""
Join and leave multiple times shouldn't affect rooms from showing up. It just
- matters that we were joined or newly_left in the from/to range. But we're also
- testing that joining and leaving after the `to_token` doesn't mess with the
- results.
+ matters that we had membership in the from/to range. But we're also testing that
+ joining and leaving after the `to_token` doesn't mess with the results.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
@@ -1458,7 +1557,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
# We create the room with user2 so the room isn't left with no members when we
# leave and can still re-join.
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
- # Join, leave, join back to the room before the from/to range
+ # Join, leave, join back to the room during the from/to range
join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
leave_response1 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
join_response2 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
@@ -1471,7 +1570,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
leave_response3 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
room_id_results = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=before_room1_token,
to_token=after_room1_token,
@@ -1496,15 +1595,19 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
}
),
)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].membership, Membership.JOIN)
# We should be `newly_joined` because we joined during the token range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, True)
+ # We should *NOT* be `newly_left` because we joined during the token range and
+ # was still joined at the end of the range
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_left, False)
def test_join_leave_multiple_times_before_range_and_after_to_token(
self,
) -> None:
"""
Join and leave multiple times before the from/to range shouldn't affect rooms
- from showing up. It just matters that we were joined or newly_left in the
+ from showing up. It just matters that we had membership in the
from/to range. But we're also testing that joining and leaving after the
`to_token` doesn't mess with the results.
"""
@@ -1529,7 +1632,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
leave_response3 = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
room_id_results = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=after_room1_token,
to_token=after_room1_token,
@@ -1554,8 +1657,10 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
}
),
)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].membership, Membership.JOIN)
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we joined before the token range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_left, False)
def test_invite_before_range_and_join_leave_after_to_token(
self,
@@ -1563,7 +1668,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
"""
Make it look like we joined after the token range but we were invited before the
from/to range so the room should still show up. See condition "1a)" comments in
- the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
+ the `get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token()` method.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
@@ -1586,7 +1691,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
leave_response = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
room_id_results = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=after_room1_token,
to_token=after_room1_token,
@@ -1608,9 +1713,11 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
}
),
)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].membership, Membership.INVITE)
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we were only invited before the
# token range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_left, False)
def test_join_and_display_name_changes_in_token_range(
self,
@@ -1658,7 +1765,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
)
room_id_results = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=before_room1_token,
to_token=after_room1_token,
@@ -1684,8 +1791,10 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
}
),
)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].membership, Membership.JOIN)
# We should be `newly_joined` because we joined during the token range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, True)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_left, False)
def test_display_name_changes_in_token_range(
self,
@@ -1721,7 +1830,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
after_change1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
room_id_results = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=after_room1_token,
to_token=after_change1_token,
@@ -1744,8 +1853,10 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
}
),
)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].membership, Membership.JOIN)
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we joined before the token range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_left, False)
def test_display_name_changes_before_and_after_token_range(
self,
@@ -1791,7 +1902,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
)
room_id_results = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=after_room1_token,
to_token=after_room1_token,
@@ -1817,8 +1928,10 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
}
),
)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].membership, Membership.JOIN)
# We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we joined before the token range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_left, False)
def test_display_name_changes_leave_after_token_range(
self,
@@ -1828,7 +1941,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
if there are multiple `join` membership events in a row indicating
`displayname`/`avatar_url` updates and we leave after the `to_token`.
- See condition "1a)" comments in the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
+ See condition "1a)" comments in the `get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token()` method.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
@@ -1871,7 +1984,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
room_id_results = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=before_room1_token,
to_token=after_room1_token,
@@ -1897,8 +2010,10 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
}
),
)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].membership, Membership.JOIN)
# We should be `newly_joined` because we joined during the token range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, True)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_left, False)
def test_display_name_changes_join_after_token_range(
self,
@@ -1908,7 +2023,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
indicating `displayname`/`avatar_url` updates doesn't affect the results (we
joined after the token range so it shouldn't show up)
- See condition "1b)" comments in the `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` method.
+ See condition "1b)" comments in the `get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token()` method.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
@@ -1937,7 +2052,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
)
room_id_results = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=before_room1_token,
to_token=after_room1_token,
@@ -1973,7 +2088,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
after_more_changes_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
room_id_results = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=after_room1_token,
to_token=after_more_changes_token,
@@ -1987,9 +2102,11 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
join_response2["event_id"],
)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].membership, Membership.JOIN)
# We should be considered `newly_joined` because there is some non-join event in
# between our latest join event.
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, True)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_left, False)
def test_newly_joined_only_joins_during_token_range(
self,
@@ -2036,7 +2153,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
room_id_results = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=before_room1_token,
to_token=after_room1_token,
@@ -2062,8 +2179,10 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
}
),
)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].membership, Membership.JOIN)
# We should be `newly_joined` because we first joined during the token range
self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, True)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_left, False)
def test_multiple_rooms_are_not_confused(
self,
@@ -2086,16 +2205,18 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
# Invited and left the room before the token
self.helper.invite(room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
- self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+ leave_room1_response = self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# Invited to room2
- self.helper.invite(room_id2, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
+ invite_room2_response = self.helper.invite(
+ room_id2, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok
+ )
before_room3_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Invited and left room3 during the from/to range
room_id3 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
self.helper.invite(room_id3, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
- self.helper.leave(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+ leave_room3_response = self.helper.leave(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
after_room3_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
@@ -2108,7 +2229,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
self.helper.leave(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
room_id_results = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=before_room3_token,
to_token=after_room3_token,
@@ -2118,19 +2239,158 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
self.assertEqual(
room_id_results.keys(),
{
- # `room_id1` shouldn't show up because we left before the from/to range
- #
- # Room should show up because we were invited before the from/to range
+ # Left before the from/to range
+ room_id1,
+ # Invited before the from/to range
room_id2,
- # Room should show up because it was newly_left during the from/to range
+ # `newly_left` during the from/to range
room_id3,
},
)
+ # Room1
+ # It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
+ self.assertEqual(
+ room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
+ leave_room1_response["event_id"],
+ )
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].membership, Membership.LEAVE)
+ # We should *NOT* be `newly_joined`/`newly_left` because we were invited and left
+ # before the token range
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_left, False)
+
+ # Room2
+ # It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
+ self.assertEqual(
+ room_id_results[room_id2].event_id,
+ invite_room2_response["event_id"],
+ )
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id2].membership, Membership.INVITE)
+ # We should *NOT* be `newly_joined`/`newly_left` because we were invited before
+ # the token range
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id2].newly_joined, False)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id2].newly_left, False)
+
+ # Room3
+ # It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
+ self.assertEqual(
+ room_id_results[room_id3].event_id,
+ leave_room3_response["event_id"],
+ )
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id3].membership, Membership.LEAVE)
+ # We should be `newly_left` because we were invited and left during
+ # the token range
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id3].newly_joined, False)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id3].newly_left, True)
+
+ def test_state_reset(self) -> None:
+ """
+ Test a state reset scenario where the user gets removed from the room (when
+ there is no corresponding leave event)
+ """
+ user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
+ user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
+ user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
+ user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
+
+ # The room where the state reset will happen
+ room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
+ join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+ # Join another room so we don't hit the short-circuit and return early if they
+ # have no room membership
+ room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
+ self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+ before_reset_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+ # Send another state event to make a position for the state reset to happen at
+ dummy_state_response = self.helper.send_state(
+ room_id1,
+ event_type="foobarbaz",
+ state_key="",
+ body={"foo": "bar"},
+ tok=user2_tok,
+ )
+ dummy_state_pos = self.get_success(
+ self.store.get_position_for_event(dummy_state_response["event_id"])
+ )
+
+ # Mock a state reset removing the membership for user1 in the current state
+ self.get_success(
+ self.store.db_pool.simple_delete(
+ table="current_state_events",
+ keyvalues={
+ "room_id": room_id1,
+ "type": EventTypes.Member,
+ "state_key": user1_id,
+ },
+ desc="state reset user in current_state_events",
+ )
+ )
+ self.get_success(
+ self.store.db_pool.simple_delete(
+ table="local_current_membership",
+ keyvalues={
+ "room_id": room_id1,
+ "user_id": user1_id,
+ },
+ desc="state reset user in local_current_membership",
+ )
+ )
+ self.get_success(
+ self.store.db_pool.simple_insert(
+ table="current_state_delta_stream",
+ values={
+ "stream_id": dummy_state_pos.stream,
+ "room_id": room_id1,
+ "type": EventTypes.Member,
+ "state_key": user1_id,
+ "event_id": None,
+ "prev_event_id": join_response1["event_id"],
+ "instance_name": dummy_state_pos.instance_name,
+ },
+ desc="state reset user in current_state_delta_stream",
+ )
+ )
+
+ # Manually bust the cache since we we're just manually messing with the database
+ # and not causing an actual state reset.
+ self.store._membership_stream_cache.entity_has_changed(
+ user1_id, dummy_state_pos.stream
+ )
+
+ after_reset_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+ # The function under test
+ room_id_results = self.get_success(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
+ UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+ from_token=before_reset_token,
+ to_token=after_reset_token,
+ )
+ )
-class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserEventShardTestCase(BaseMultiWorkerStreamTestCase):
+ # Room1 should show up because it was `newly_left` via state reset during the from/to range
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1, room_id2})
+ # It should be pointing to no event because we were removed from the room
+ # without a corresponding leave event
+ self.assertEqual(
+ room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
+ None,
+ )
+ # State reset caused us to leave the room and there is no corresponding leave event
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].membership, Membership.LEAVE)
+ # We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we joined before the token range
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
+ # We should be `newly_left` because we were removed via state reset during the from/to range
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_left, True)
+
+
+class GetRoomMembershipForUserAtToTokenShardTestCase(BaseMultiWorkerStreamTestCase):
"""
- Tests Sliding Sync handler `get_sync_room_ids_for_user()` to make sure it works with
+ Tests Sliding Sync handler `get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token()` to make sure it works with
sharded event stream_writers enabled
"""
@@ -2189,7 +2449,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserEventShardTestCase(BaseMultiWorkerStreamTestCase):
We then send some events to advance the stream positions of worker1 and worker3
but worker2 is lagging behind because it's stuck. We are specifically testing
- that `get_sync_room_ids_for_user(from_token=xxx, to_token=xxx)` should work
+ that `get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(from_token=xxx, to_token=xxx)` should work
correctly in these adverse conditions.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
@@ -2228,7 +2488,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserEventShardTestCase(BaseMultiWorkerStreamTestCase):
join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
join_response2 = self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# Leave room2
- self.helper.leave(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+ leave_room2_response = self.helper.leave(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
join_response3 = self.helper.join(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# Leave room3
self.helper.leave(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
@@ -2265,7 +2525,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserEventShardTestCase(BaseMultiWorkerStreamTestCase):
# For room_id1/worker1: leave and join the room to advance the stream position
# and generate membership changes.
self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
- self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+ join_room1_response = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# For room_id2/worker2: which is currently stuck, join the room.
join_on_worker2_response = self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
# For room_id3/worker3: leave and join the room to advance the stream position
@@ -2319,7 +2579,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserEventShardTestCase(BaseMultiWorkerStreamTestCase):
# The function under test
room_id_results = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
UserID.from_string(user1_id),
from_token=before_stuck_activity_token,
to_token=stuck_activity_token,
@@ -2330,18 +2590,411 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserEventShardTestCase(BaseMultiWorkerStreamTestCase):
room_id_results.keys(),
{
room_id1,
- # room_id2 shouldn't show up because we left before the from/to range
- # and the join event during the range happened while worker2 was stuck.
- # This means that from the perspective of the master, where the
- # `stuck_activity_token` is generated, the stream position for worker2
- # wasn't advanced to the join yet. Looking at the `instance_map`, the
- # join technically comes after `stuck_activity_token``.
- #
- # room_id2,
+ room_id2,
room_id3,
},
)
+ # Room1
+ # It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
+ self.assertEqual(
+ room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
+ join_room1_response["event_id"],
+ )
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].membership, Membership.JOIN)
+ # We should be `newly_joined` because we joined during the token range
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, True)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_left, False)
+
+ # Room2
+ # It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
+ self.assertEqual(
+ room_id_results[room_id2].event_id,
+ leave_room2_response["event_id"],
+ )
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id2].membership, Membership.LEAVE)
+ # room_id2 should *NOT* be considered `newly_left` because we left before the
+ # from/to range and the join event during the range happened while worker2 was
+ # stuck. This means that from the perspective of the master, where the
+ # `stuck_activity_token` is generated, the stream position for worker2 wasn't
+ # advanced to the join yet. Looking at the `instance_map`, the join technically
+ # comes after `stuck_activity_token`.
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id2].newly_joined, False)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id2].newly_left, False)
+
+ # Room3
+ # It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
+ self.assertEqual(
+ room_id_results[room_id3].event_id,
+ join_on_worker3_response["event_id"],
+ )
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id3].membership, Membership.JOIN)
+ # We should be `newly_joined` because we joined during the token range
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id3].newly_joined, True)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id3].newly_left, False)
+
+
+class FilterRoomsRelevantForSyncTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
+ """
+ Tests Sliding Sync handler `filter_rooms_relevant_for_sync()` to make sure it returns
+ the correct list of rooms IDs.
+ """
+
+ servlets = [
+ admin.register_servlets,
+ knock.register_servlets,
+ login.register_servlets,
+ room.register_servlets,
+ ]
+
+ def default_config(self) -> JsonDict:
+ config = super().default_config()
+ # Enable sliding sync
+ config["experimental_features"] = {"msc3575_enabled": True}
+ return config
+
+ def prepare(self, reactor: MemoryReactor, clock: Clock, hs: HomeServer) -> None:
+ self.sliding_sync_handler = self.hs.get_sliding_sync_handler()
+ self.store = self.hs.get_datastores().main
+ self.event_sources = hs.get_event_sources()
+ self.storage_controllers = hs.get_storage_controllers()
+
+ def _get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self,
+ user: UserID,
+ to_token: StreamToken,
+ from_token: Optional[StreamToken],
+ ) -> Dict[str, _RoomMembershipForUser]:
+ """
+ Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
+ """
+ room_membership_for_user_map = self.get_success(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
+ user=user,
+ from_token=from_token,
+ to_token=to_token,
+ )
+ )
+ filtered_sync_room_map = self.get_success(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms_relevant_for_sync(
+ user=user,
+ room_membership_for_user_map=room_membership_for_user_map,
+ )
+ )
+
+ return filtered_sync_room_map
+
+ def test_no_rooms(self) -> None:
+ """
+ Test when the user has never joined any rooms before
+ """
+ user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
+ # user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
+
+ now_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+ room_id_results = self._get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+ from_token=now_token,
+ to_token=now_token,
+ )
+
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), set())
+
+ def test_basic_rooms(self) -> None:
+ """
+ Test that rooms that the user is joined to, invited to, banned from, and knocked
+ on show up.
+ """
+ user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
+ user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
+ user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
+ user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
+
+ before_room_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+ join_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
+ join_response = self.helper.join(join_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+ # Setup the invited room (user2 invites user1 to the room)
+ invited_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
+ invite_response = self.helper.invite(
+ invited_room_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok
+ )
+
+ # Setup the ban room (user2 bans user1 from the room)
+ ban_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
+ user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True
+ )
+ self.helper.join(ban_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+ ban_response = self.helper.ban(
+ ban_room_id, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok
+ )
+
+ # Setup the knock room (user1 knocks on the room)
+ knock_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
+ user2_id, tok=user2_tok, room_version=RoomVersions.V7.identifier
+ )
+ self.helper.send_state(
+ knock_room_id,
+ EventTypes.JoinRules,
+ {"join_rule": JoinRules.KNOCK},
+ tok=user2_tok,
+ )
+ # User1 knocks on the room
+ knock_channel = self.make_request(
+ "POST",
+ "/_matrix/client/r0/knock/%s" % (knock_room_id,),
+ b"{}",
+ user1_tok,
+ )
+ self.assertEqual(knock_channel.code, 200, knock_channel.result)
+ knock_room_membership_state_event = self.get_success(
+ self.storage_controllers.state.get_current_state_event(
+ knock_room_id, EventTypes.Member, user1_id
+ )
+ )
+ assert knock_room_membership_state_event is not None
+
+ after_room_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+ room_id_results = self._get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+ from_token=before_room_token,
+ to_token=after_room_token,
+ )
+
+ # Ensure that the invited, ban, and knock rooms show up
+ self.assertEqual(
+ room_id_results.keys(),
+ {
+ join_room_id,
+ invited_room_id,
+ ban_room_id,
+ knock_room_id,
+ },
+ )
+ # It should be pointing to the the respective membership event (latest
+ # membership event in the from/to range)
+ self.assertEqual(
+ room_id_results[join_room_id].event_id,
+ join_response["event_id"],
+ )
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[join_room_id].membership, Membership.JOIN)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[join_room_id].newly_joined, True)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[join_room_id].newly_left, False)
+
+ self.assertEqual(
+ room_id_results[invited_room_id].event_id,
+ invite_response["event_id"],
+ )
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[invited_room_id].membership, Membership.INVITE)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[invited_room_id].newly_joined, False)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[invited_room_id].newly_left, False)
+
+ self.assertEqual(
+ room_id_results[ban_room_id].event_id,
+ ban_response["event_id"],
+ )
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[ban_room_id].membership, Membership.BAN)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[ban_room_id].newly_joined, False)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[ban_room_id].newly_left, False)
+
+ self.assertEqual(
+ room_id_results[knock_room_id].event_id,
+ knock_room_membership_state_event.event_id,
+ )
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[knock_room_id].membership, Membership.KNOCK)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[knock_room_id].newly_joined, False)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[knock_room_id].newly_left, False)
+
+ def test_only_newly_left_rooms_show_up(self) -> None:
+ """
+ Test that `newly_left` rooms still show up in the sync response but rooms that
+ were left before the `from_token` don't show up. See condition "2)" comments in
+ the `get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token()` method.
+ """
+ user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
+ user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
+
+ # Leave before we calculate the `from_token`
+ room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+ self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+ after_room1_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+ # Leave during the from_token/to_token range (newly_left)
+ room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+ _leave_response2 = self.helper.leave(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+ after_room2_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+ room_id_results = self._get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+ from_token=after_room1_token,
+ to_token=after_room2_token,
+ )
+
+ # Only the `newly_left` room should show up
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id2})
+ self.assertEqual(
+ room_id_results[room_id2].event_id,
+ _leave_response2["event_id"],
+ )
+ # We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we are instead `newly_left`
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id2].newly_joined, False)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id2].newly_left, True)
+
+ def test_get_kicked_room(self) -> None:
+ """
+ Test that a room that the user was kicked from still shows up. When the user
+ comes back to their client, they should see that they were kicked.
+ """
+ user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
+ user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
+ user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
+ user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
+
+ # Setup the kick room (user2 kicks user1 from the room)
+ kick_room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(
+ user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True
+ )
+ self.helper.join(kick_room_id, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+ # Kick user1 from the room
+ kick_response = self.helper.change_membership(
+ room=kick_room_id,
+ src=user2_id,
+ targ=user1_id,
+ tok=user2_tok,
+ membership=Membership.LEAVE,
+ extra_data={
+ "reason": "Bad manners",
+ },
+ )
+
+ after_kick_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+ room_id_results = self._get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+ from_token=after_kick_token,
+ to_token=after_kick_token,
+ )
+
+ # The kicked room should show up
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {kick_room_id})
+ # It should be pointing to the latest membership event in the from/to range
+ self.assertEqual(
+ room_id_results[kick_room_id].event_id,
+ kick_response["event_id"],
+ )
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[kick_room_id].membership, Membership.LEAVE)
+ self.assertNotEqual(room_id_results[kick_room_id].sender, user1_id)
+ # We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we were not joined at the the time
+ # of the `to_token`.
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[kick_room_id].newly_joined, False)
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[kick_room_id].newly_left, False)
+
+ def test_state_reset(self) -> None:
+ """
+ Test a state reset scenario where the user gets removed from the room (when
+ there is no corresponding leave event)
+ """
+ user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
+ user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
+ user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
+ user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
+
+ # The room where the state reset will happen
+ room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
+ join_response1 = self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+ # Join another room so we don't hit the short-circuit and return early if they
+ # have no room membership
+ room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
+ self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+ before_reset_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+ # Send another state event to make a position for the state reset to happen at
+ dummy_state_response = self.helper.send_state(
+ room_id1,
+ event_type="foobarbaz",
+ state_key="",
+ body={"foo": "bar"},
+ tok=user2_tok,
+ )
+ dummy_state_pos = self.get_success(
+ self.store.get_position_for_event(dummy_state_response["event_id"])
+ )
+
+ # Mock a state reset removing the membership for user1 in the current state
+ self.get_success(
+ self.store.db_pool.simple_delete(
+ table="current_state_events",
+ keyvalues={
+ "room_id": room_id1,
+ "type": EventTypes.Member,
+ "state_key": user1_id,
+ },
+ desc="state reset user in current_state_events",
+ )
+ )
+ self.get_success(
+ self.store.db_pool.simple_delete(
+ table="local_current_membership",
+ keyvalues={
+ "room_id": room_id1,
+ "user_id": user1_id,
+ },
+ desc="state reset user in local_current_membership",
+ )
+ )
+ self.get_success(
+ self.store.db_pool.simple_insert(
+ table="current_state_delta_stream",
+ values={
+ "stream_id": dummy_state_pos.stream,
+ "room_id": room_id1,
+ "type": EventTypes.Member,
+ "state_key": user1_id,
+ "event_id": None,
+ "prev_event_id": join_response1["event_id"],
+ "instance_name": dummy_state_pos.instance_name,
+ },
+ desc="state reset user in current_state_delta_stream",
+ )
+ )
+
+ # Manually bust the cache since we we're just manually messing with the database
+ # and not causing an actual state reset.
+ self.store._membership_stream_cache.entity_has_changed(
+ user1_id, dummy_state_pos.stream
+ )
+
+ after_reset_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+ # The function under test
+ room_id_results = self._get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+ from_token=before_reset_token,
+ to_token=after_reset_token,
+ )
+
+ # Room1 should show up because it was `newly_left` via state reset during the from/to range
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1, room_id2})
+ # It should be pointing to no event because we were removed from the room
+ # without a corresponding leave event
+ self.assertEqual(
+ room_id_results[room_id1].event_id,
+ None,
+ )
+ # State reset caused us to leave the room and there is no corresponding leave event
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].membership, Membership.LEAVE)
+ # We should *NOT* be `newly_joined` because we joined before the token range
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_joined, False)
+ # We should be `newly_left` because we were removed via state reset during the from/to range
+ self.assertEqual(room_id_results[room_id1].newly_left, True)
+
class FilterRoomsTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
"""
@@ -2367,6 +3020,31 @@ class FilterRoomsTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
self.store = self.hs.get_datastores().main
self.event_sources = hs.get_event_sources()
+ def _get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self,
+ user: UserID,
+ to_token: StreamToken,
+ from_token: Optional[StreamToken],
+ ) -> Dict[str, _RoomMembershipForUser]:
+ """
+ Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
+ """
+ room_membership_for_user_map = self.get_success(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
+ user=user,
+ from_token=from_token,
+ to_token=to_token,
+ )
+ )
+ filtered_sync_room_map = self.get_success(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms_relevant_for_sync(
+ user=user,
+ room_membership_for_user_map=room_membership_for_user_map,
+ )
+ )
+
+ return filtered_sync_room_map
+
def _create_dm_room(
self,
inviter_user_id: str,
@@ -2438,12 +3116,10 @@ class FilterRoomsTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
- sync_room_map = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
- UserID.from_string(user1_id),
- from_token=None,
- to_token=after_rooms_token,
- )
+ sync_room_map = self._get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+ from_token=None,
+ to_token=after_rooms_token,
)
# Try with `is_dm=True`
@@ -2496,12 +3172,10 @@ class FilterRoomsTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
- sync_room_map = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
- UserID.from_string(user1_id),
- from_token=None,
- to_token=after_rooms_token,
- )
+ sync_room_map = self._get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+ from_token=None,
+ to_token=after_rooms_token,
)
# Try with `is_encrypted=True`
@@ -2552,12 +3226,10 @@ class FilterRoomsTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
- sync_room_map = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
- UserID.from_string(user1_id),
- from_token=None,
- to_token=after_rooms_token,
- )
+ sync_room_map = self._get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+ from_token=None,
+ to_token=after_rooms_token,
)
# Try with `is_invite=True`
@@ -2621,12 +3293,10 @@ class FilterRoomsTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
- sync_room_map = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
- UserID.from_string(user1_id),
- from_token=None,
- to_token=after_rooms_token,
- )
+ sync_room_map = self._get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+ from_token=None,
+ to_token=after_rooms_token,
)
# Try finding only normal rooms
@@ -2714,12 +3384,10 @@ class FilterRoomsTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
- sync_room_map = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
- UserID.from_string(user1_id),
- from_token=None,
- to_token=after_rooms_token,
- )
+ sync_room_map = self._get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+ from_token=None,
+ to_token=after_rooms_token,
)
# Try finding *NOT* normal rooms
@@ -2838,12 +3506,10 @@ class FilterRoomsTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
- sync_room_map = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
- UserID.from_string(user1_id),
- from_token=None,
- to_token=after_rooms_token,
- )
+ sync_room_map = self._get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+ from_token=None,
+ to_token=after_rooms_token,
)
filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
@@ -2884,6 +3550,31 @@ class SortRoomsTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
self.store = self.hs.get_datastores().main
self.event_sources = hs.get_event_sources()
+ def _get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ self,
+ user: UserID,
+ to_token: StreamToken,
+ from_token: Optional[StreamToken],
+ ) -> Dict[str, _RoomMembershipForUser]:
+ """
+ Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
+ """
+ room_membership_for_user_map = self.get_success(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.get_room_membership_for_user_at_to_token(
+ user=user,
+ from_token=from_token,
+ to_token=to_token,
+ )
+ )
+ filtered_sync_room_map = self.get_success(
+ self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms_relevant_for_sync(
+ user=user,
+ room_membership_for_user_map=room_membership_for_user_map,
+ )
+ )
+
+ return filtered_sync_room_map
+
def test_sort_activity_basic(self) -> None:
"""
Rooms with newer activity are sorted first.
@@ -2903,12 +3594,10 @@ class SortRoomsTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
- sync_room_map = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
- UserID.from_string(user1_id),
- from_token=None,
- to_token=after_rooms_token,
- )
+ sync_room_map = self._get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+ from_token=None,
+ to_token=after_rooms_token,
)
# Sort the rooms (what we're testing)
@@ -2986,12 +3675,10 @@ class SortRoomsTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
self.helper.send(room_id3, "activity in room3", tok=user2_tok)
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
- sync_room_map = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
- UserID.from_string(user1_id),
- from_token=before_rooms_token,
- to_token=after_rooms_token,
- )
+ sync_room_map = self._get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+ from_token=before_rooms_token,
+ to_token=after_rooms_token,
)
# Sort the rooms (what we're testing)
@@ -3052,12 +3739,10 @@ class SortRoomsTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
# Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
- sync_room_map = self.get_success(
- self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
- UserID.from_string(user1_id),
- from_token=None,
- to_token=after_rooms_token,
- )
+ sync_room_map = self._get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+ UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+ from_token=None,
+ to_token=after_rooms_token,
)
# Sort the rooms (what we're testing)
|
